Personal Can Ethics Get Discuss Case Study

Therein was her first ethical dilemma: should she remain quiet about this, or should she share this information with others and see what their response will be? Her boyfriend gave her worthy advice: keep this to yourself because if your boss is found to be accepting kickbacks, and this revelation results in his removal from the company, her unit may well be disbanded, or otherwise affected in a way unfriendly to existing employees. The fact that Valerie's work visa situation -- she did not have a "green card" -- was largely dependent on the good will and fairness of those in supervisory positions in her company put her in a tight spot. Moreover her ethical decision-making was also stymied temporarily because she was enrolled in a master's program at the University of Chicago, and her continuing with her education was predicated on getting high grades. If she got good grades, her company reimbursed her for her tuition, which was likely a substantial amount of money -- more than a recent immigrant could likely afford. In the event that she would be fired or somehow lose her job because she reported Waters' felonious behavior, she would only have 30 days to find a new job. Her own future was part of her ethical dilemma; would she "out" her boss because it was the ethical thing to do while throwing away her own career and...

...

She should make no effort to expose the wrongdoing of her boss Waters. Instead, the first thing she should do is go to the Illinois State Bar Association and arrange for a free referral to an attorney who deals with immigration issues. She could also reach out to www.usimmigrationlawyers.com and receive an initial consultation free of charge from an attorney that fully understands the legal implications vis-a-vis her temporary work visa. She should not sacrifice herself and her future career options, even though her conscience bothers her a lot. She also should continue to perform her work-related duties with excellence, and not tell her colleagues what she knows about Waters.
Works Cited

Clegg, Stewart, Kornberger, Martin, and Rhodes, Carl. (2007). Organizational ethics, decision making, undecidability. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 393-408.

Hellriegel, Don, Slocum, John W., and Woodman, Richard W. (1989). Organizational Behavior.

St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

James, Harvey S. (2000). Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making through Organizational

Structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 43-58.

Schminke, Marshall, Arnaud, Anke, and Kuenzi,…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Clegg, Stewart, Kornberger, Martin, and Rhodes, Carl. (2007). Organizational ethics, decision making, undecidability. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 393-408.

Hellriegel, Don, Slocum, John W., and Woodman, Richard W. (1989). Organizational Behavior.

St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

James, Harvey S. (2000). Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making through Organizational


Cite this Document:

"Personal Can Ethics Get Discuss" (2010, July 08) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-can-ethics-get-discuss-12549

"Personal Can Ethics Get Discuss" 08 July 2010. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-can-ethics-get-discuss-12549>

"Personal Can Ethics Get Discuss", 08 July 2010, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-can-ethics-get-discuss-12549

Related Documents

Personal Ethics Development A personal ethics system is a category of philosophy that stands apart from other ethical systems such as business ethics, legal ethics, value ethics, or any of the other various ethical perspectives. The component that makes a personal ethical system special is that it is uniquely derived from an individual's experiences and beliefs. Although an individual's ethical system may share overlapping material from more formal systems, it also

Waters appears to have fairly limited ethics. His moral imperative appears to be guided by whatever will benefit him the most personally. Under his watch, the organization has become less effective and has seen its size reduced by 60%. Waters does not feel the need to work hard, so he provides a poor example for his team as well. He is an ineffective leader, and is not respected by his

Basically, she is confronting the issue of role ambiguity. Is it really her job to monitor corporate ethics and compliance or should she simply wait until her manager hangs himself through his own carelessness? This introduces another stressor that she faces, that is, one of career development. Turning her boss in jeopardizes her upward mobility. Ambiguity and threat to her career are big factors. The interpersonal relationships she has developed

Business Ethics At one time it may have been possible, if inhumane, to run a business like the Robber Barons, on sheer fear, power and control. If a person incorrectly followed directions, made too many mistakes, or did not put in numerous extra hours, then he/she was expendable. Someone else could easily take that place in the factory. In these days of quickly changing times and technology, increased globalization, international competition, and

Therefore, corporations have had to change their viewpoints and start looking at the long-term consequences of their behavior, as well as looking at the bottom line. Businesses also have to be concerned because consumers have also become aware of environmental concerns, and many consumers are demanding earth-friendly products and have shown a willingness to pay more money to competitors who observe environmentally-friendly practices. Interestingly enough, this demand has given rise

There are several ways that BP could have chosen to respond, all of which were "open" to them (i.e. they had free will), yet those chose to take paths that were less moral. Kant's universal law would have them put their responsibility to humanity as the motivator, however, their motives have not proven to be driven by doing what is genuinely good for humanity. Blackburn (2009) states that it is