Personality Construct Development Of A Research Paper

(Humans are often called 'social animals'). However, the test construct acknowledged the fact that no one is perfectly social or asocial but a mix of both characteristics. Extroversion and introversion are not necessarily either/or qualities, which has been one of the critiques of the Myers-Brigg assessment. In future forms of this extroversion inventory, creating a typology of different types of introversion and extroversion would be useful. For example, some people are very extroverted with friends, but are more socially reserved in a work context. Others are very introverted in the sense that they like to be alone, but can still 'get by' in social environments and perform like extroverts. It is also possible to be very confident speaking in public to large groups of people, but to feel more uncomfortable one-on-one, in personal social contexts. Additionally, positive forms of sociability -- such as compassion -- and negative forms -- such as conformity with the group at the expense of one's own opinions -- should be measured in a future scale. Some aspects of sociability such as agreeing with others at the expense of one's own opinion can have detrimental social consequences, just like a fear of speaking in public as a result of introversion can have negative personal consequences. Having a list of different items to score for positive and negative qualities of introversion and extroversion would paint a more complete picture of the individual's psyche.

...

In general, of the bell curve of standard deviation, most responses were clustered at the end of the extroversion scale, with a large percentage of agreement with most of the responses. In the future, it would be necessary to include more 'extreme' responses, indicating more abnormal forms of introversion (to the point of a total lack of voluntary sociability) and extroversion (a difficulty in being alone with one's own thoughts) to generate a bell curve of standard deviation of the results.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

DISC assessment. (2010). DISC homepage. Retrieved September 17, 2010 at http://www.churchangeldisc.com/definitionofdisc.html

Measuring the big five personality factors. (2010). Department of Psychology. University of Oregon. Retrieved September 17, 2010 at http://www.uoregon.edu/~sanjay/bigfive.html#where

Myers, Isabel Briggs & Peter B. Myers (1995). Gifts differing. Mountain View, CA: Davies-

Black Publishing.
Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18 (1): 51-55. Retrieved September 17, 2010 at http://www.industrialpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0972-6748;year=2009;volume=18;issue=1;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Singh


Cite this Document:

"Personality Construct Development Of A" (2010, September 19) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-construct-development-of-a-12188

"Personality Construct Development Of A" 19 September 2010. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-construct-development-of-a-12188>

"Personality Construct Development Of A", 19 September 2010, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-construct-development-of-a-12188

Related Documents

This test is useful because it can bring to light certain aspects of anxiety that are manifested somatically, even if the student is unwilling to admit about worrying about test performance on the more overt questions. Then, if a strong correlation was shown between high levels of test anxiety amongst African-American students and a lower-than-expected performance on the SAT when compared with their white counterparts, more qualitative work could

Personality Theory Describe and discuss the basic characteristics, tenets and methods of investigation/research for psychodynamic and cognitive perspectives regarding personality psychology, and the benefits/strengths and limitations/weaknesses of each approach. The challenge that the researchers and personality theorists will face is to parsimoniously capture the process-oriented and dynamic nature of personality. Dweck (1996) in an earlier study asserts that "trait theorists have addressed some of the more static, descriptive aspects of personality-how people

The two interpersonal scales are Dominance and Warmth. Many of the clinical scales, as well as the aggression scale, also have a number of subscales to provide more nuanced information bout each of the clinical conditions. For example, the Borderline Features scale has four subscales: Affective Instability, Identity Problems, Negative Relationships and Self-Harm. The resulting score profiles can be compared to either normative or clinical populations. Raw scores are converted

Personality Development in Immigrant Children Personality development is one of the most commonly researched areas of psychology. At first blush, the relation between personality and the cognitive development of immigrant children may appear somewhat nebulous. However, as contemporary research moves ever closer to an integrative approach, the fields of social and biological science -- once regarded as discrete disciplines -- are merging like the overlapping disks of a Venn diagram. The cognitive

Personality and Leadership
PAGES 5 WORDS 1573

Personality and Leadership Personality most certainly has an impact on a person's leadership style, effectiveness, and overall competence. And clearly the personality traits shown by leaders impact underlings and employees in numerous ways. In this paper personality -- as linked to leadership skills and styles -- will be viewed through scholarly references and research. Also, the issue of nature vs. nurture will be reviewed and critiqued as well. What is Personality? The New

Personality Psychological Approaches to Understanding Personality Personality is one part of psychology where there are many conflicting ideas. It is fair to say that there is not one single approach to personality that is considered as accepted. Instead, there are a range of ways that personality can be considered. This paper will describe three of these ways: the psychodynamic approach, the trait approach, and the behavioral approach. After each approach is described