Proponents Of Intelligent Design And Essay

PAGES
6
WORDS
1765
Cite

Although the Intelligent Design theory presents interesting objections, the idea that someone or some thing is absolutely necessary for every progressive development within a species fails to be prevalent through consistent testing of such debates. Intelligent Design provides much more theory than it does evidence; while evolutionism provides physical evidence to back its conceits. Yet, despite the stronger merit towards the evolutionist theory, schools should present both theories in order t allow each student the capability to reason for themselves about the nature of the earth and its inhabitants. Lessons regarding the Intelligent Design theory should be presented to students with the idea that it is a relatively improvable theory rather than pure scientific fact.

Mayr, Ernst. What Evolution is. Basic Books. 2002. And so, both evolution and Intelligent Design should be presented to students with their benefits and all facts which don't match up. Since...

...

Inevitably, it is up to each individual to choose what one believes,
Works Cited

Mayr, Ernst. What Evolution Is. Basic Books. 2002.

Meyer, S.C. "DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, specification and explanation."

Darwinism, Design, & Public Education. Michigan State University Press. 2003. Pp. 223-285.

Sloan, Phillip. "Evolution." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008. Retrieved 29 Nov 2008 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution/#2.2.

Tungate, Mel. "Evolution Court Cases." Tungate. 2006. Retrieved 30 Nov 2008 at http://www.tungate.com/evolution_court_cases.htm.

Wells, Jonathan. "Survival of the Fakest." American Spectator. 101 (6). 1996. Retrieved 30 Nov 2008 at http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Mayr, Ernst. What Evolution Is. Basic Books. 2002.

Meyer, S.C. "DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, specification and explanation."

Darwinism, Design, & Public Education. Michigan State University Press. 2003. Pp. 223-285.

Sloan, Phillip. "Evolution." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008. Retrieved 29 Nov 2008 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution/#2.2.
Tungate, Mel. "Evolution Court Cases." Tungate. 2006. Retrieved 30 Nov 2008 at http://www.tungate.com/evolution_court_cases.htm.
Wells, Jonathan. "Survival of the Fakest." American Spectator. 101 (6). 1996. Retrieved 30 Nov 2008 at http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Proponents Of Intelligent Design And" (2008, November 30) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/proponents-of-intelligent-design-and-26274

"Proponents Of Intelligent Design And" 30 November 2008. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/proponents-of-intelligent-design-and-26274>

"Proponents Of Intelligent Design And", 30 November 2008, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/proponents-of-intelligent-design-and-26274

Related Documents

Intelligent Design Man has always asked questions about how the world began. All cultures in the ancient world had origin myths. People looked to higher powers, or deities, or life forces, to explain what they could not understand. Researchers do not know where humankind's need for spirituality comes from, but it is clear, looking at history, that faith and the need to believe in something greater than ourselves are part of

But science is about stepping stones: the creation of theories and hypothesis, and the testing of these hypotheses with empiricism. If these theories fail, then additional hypotheses have to be proposed. During the process of the testing these hypothesis, experimentalists will find evidence based that will enable to fine tuning of the hypothesis, and the process carries on. Indeed, most of quantum theory is hinged on the Uncertainty principle

10)?" Indicating that there is no intellectual discourse on the subject, and, because they have already indicated that they perceive creationists as backward, asocial, and people essentially not capable of intellectual discourse on the subject; this book is done. However, and to the mystery of anyone who reads as far as the first ten pages of the book, the book lingers for more than 200 pages. Young and Edis begin

Science is in no way immune from politics, ideology, or corruption. In a democratic society, though, science functions much as the media does. It exists separate from the state in order to preserve the objectivity that is so fundamental to its very existence. When politics infiltrates science, the results can be disastrous in some cases. The state could silence scientific data, for example, throw funding at science dedicated to nefarious

In conclusion, perhaps we should heed the words of Charles Darwin himself who before his historic voyage aboard the H.M.S. Beagle between 1831 and 1836 was a devout Christian and creationist -- "There is a grandeur in this view of life. Whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and

Evolution be Taught in Schools? Introduction / Thesis (Part One) The debate between those that believe in creationism -- or "intelligent design," a refined offshoot of the creationism theory -- and those who believe in the science of evolution, spilled over into the schools in the United States many years ago. Conservative Christians and others who are in denial vis-a-vis Charles Darwin's research and theory argue that at the very least