School Response to Student Suicide Term Paper

Excerpt from Term Paper :

School Response to Student Suicide: Postvention

The emotional impact on family and friends following an adolescent suicide - and the school's response to a suicide - has not been the subject of the same level of intense research as have: a) the causes of suicides; and b) programs to prevent suicides. However, there is now an emerging body of solid research on what protocol a school can put into place, to be more prepared in the unfortunate circumstance of a teen suicide. Indeed, on the subject of tragedy, in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, many schools and communities re-tooled their crisis/response plans for dealing with such threats. And yet, in many ways, the sudden, inexplicable death of a student can cause serious psychological ramifications to fellow students on a part with the shockwaves following an attack by terrorists. And hence, this paper analyzes literature that is available, relating to how a school can prepare an appropriate intervention crisis plan - postvention - to be put into effect well in advance of a tragedy, as well as issues closely tied to postvention. A good plan offers specifics in terms of how teachers, parents, administrators, and fellow students, can meet the sadness head-on, while avoiding confusion, misinformation, accusations, and emotions of rage or denial.

Why a need for postvention? The frequency of adolescent suicide is alarming.

Meanwhile, as to the seriousness of student suicide - and the resulting urgent need for schools to be planning ahead for crisis intervention - key facts are worthy of mention. Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among young people ages 18-24 (King, 1999). And even more updated surveys indicate that suicide "completion rates" more than doubled during the 1990s, and that among Caucasian adolescents, it is the 2nd leading cause of death" (Eckert, Tanya, et. al, 2003); for African-American adolescents, it is the third leading cause of death; further, Eckert asserts that 20.5% of high school students have "seriously considered" attempting suicide during a recent 12-month period, and that 7.7% reported making at least one suicide attempt in that same time span. Eckert goes on to report that, in 1998, "nearly five times more boys than girls in the 15-19-year-old range committed suicide," albeit the ejournal Health and Health Care in Schools (HHCS) states that "females contemplate and attempt suicide at much higher rates than males." The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports that, "In 1999, more teenagers and young adults died from suicide than from cancer, heart disease, AIDS, birth defects, stroke, and chronic lung disease combined." The CDC also reports that "Persons under age 25 accounted for 15% of all suicides in the year 2000."

The ejournal HHCS claims there are approximately 11 adolescent suicides daily, while Dr. Carol Watkins (Northern Baltimore Psychiatric Associates) asserts that a youth "commits suicide every two hours" in America. Dr. Watkins also states that for every "completed suicide" there are 23 gestures and attempts by others, and that about 10% of those who attempt suicide later complete the act. Adding to those sobering statistics is the fact that in the U.S., over 2 million children and adolescents (3.4%) younger than 18 "have experienced the death of a parent" (Christ, Grace, et al., 2003).

Are professionals aware of postvention plans in their schools?

Meanwhile, in Ohio, a recent survey of 1,270 school administrators, counselors, and teachers (Wolfe, Jane, et. al, 1998), sought to determine not just the presence of postvention programs - but, just how many school professionals knew whether or not their school had such a plan. With cooperation from the State Department of Ohio, questionnaires were mailed to an equal number of schools in four quadrants. The overall response rate was 42%; and 491 of the respondents (40% of the total sample) reported that their school did indeed have postvention programs, while 750 (60%) said their school either did not have a plan (20%) or that they did not know (40%) if their schools indeed had a postvention plan. One in three professionals are not sure whether or not their school has postvention procedures planned? That is clearly not a very impressive statistic for educators, particularly in a time of high frequency of student suicides. (Not surprisingly, administrators [61%] and counselors [78%] were most likely to report their school had a plan.)

For those left behind - the need for well-thought-out postvention programs

Informative collaborative studies on postvention were recently compiled by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) - with input from: CDC, NIH, HRSA, HHS, HIS, SAMHSA. The research is located on the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention group (NSSP) Web site, entitled, "Developing a Research Agenda for Suicide Survivors" (1990). The study states that suicide survivors, "compared to mourners of accidental, expected, and unexpected natural modes of death, had heightened feelings of responsibility and rejection, greater difficulty making sense of the death, and greater overall grief reactions."

The NIMH reports cites recent literature germane to the issue, which suggests that the following post-suicide subjects need further study: 1) understanding the "stigma" or "impact" of social response to suicide survivors; 2) the sense of guilt survivors feel for not having helped prevent the suicide; 3) the deterioration of family communication, possibly denial, following the death; 4) the parallel characteristics which are to be found within survivors, which led to the original suicide victim's demise, and the risks due to survivors' modeling of the victim's behaviors; 5) understanding how the burden on the survivors (of the same age) relates to their relationship with one another; 6) are there subgroups of survivors who face more burden, less burden, based on race, socioeconomic level, religion? 7) what support services are the most beneficial? 8) do survivors need help as they address shame and the "death stigma" coming from the community?

The NIMH study, while noting that many survivors later become "advocates" for suicide prevention, also pointed out that, unfortunately, many "first responders" (police, fire, rescue personnel, nurses, clergy, funeral home directors) are inadequately trained or prepared in their response to suicides. "Many survivors," the NIMH report continues, "have been further traumatized by insensitive first responders," and there are critical needs for better documentation of "both helpful and hurtful interactions" from those responders.

Step-by-step: how postvention projects should be done very instructive piece of literature on postvention (King, 1999), published in the American Journal of Health Studies, is among the most succinct and well-structured of several postvention program descriptions available. Keith A. King - who has done extensive research into adolescent and school issues with reference to suicide "myths" and prevention - points out that, postvention actions should be put in place not just when a student completes a suicide act, but when an act has been clearly threatened, or certainly when attempted. And further, King states that too often after an actual suicide, schools without postvention preparation fall into the trap of denial that the suicide happened, or, of refraining from discussing it for fear talk will cause "cluster" (e.g., copycat) suicides.

Teamwork. And, to be sure, cluster suicides are indeed a real threat following the death of a student; hence, once again, the urgent need for postvention. Who should be part of postvention planning? King says a team of school counselors, school psychologists, school social workers, school nurses, trained teachers, and resource individuals from area public health service agencies, should combine strengths and resources, meet frequently, and work out strategies. Their team role, at the outset, is to "minimize the trauma," and "provide overall coordination, communication, and implementation" of the postvention program. A systematic response is vital, King adds.

Inclusion of Teachers & Staff. Teachers need to be brought into the picture, once the postvention team is in place and ready to proceed in the unfortunate event of a suicide. "Teachers and school staff should be informed that some students may experience posttraumatic symptoms such as sadness, fear, anger, and shame" following a suicide. Those students may "act out truancy, substance use, and delinquency" as a method to "maladaptively adjust to the trauma." The students closest to the victim are the most likely to show the above-mentioned symptoms, and hence, should be watched carefully.

Available agency links. Well before any student commits suicide, the postvention team must be certain that the school knows which specific agencies and services that will need to be contacted after the suicide. These agencies include: police, ambulance, hospital, youth services, and mental health facilities, of course. Those phone numbers - and names of contact people - should be pre-published on a list which all key team members will have within their grasp.

Swift reactions. Timing is pivotal, when postvention action goes into play. "Waiting to enact the postvention activities after 24 hours can be suicidogenic," King writes. As was stated at the outset of this section of the paper, "the immediate goal" is to minimize the trauma and psychological distress to students and staff - an in so doing, derail the likelihood of cluster suicides.

Acting…

Online Sources Used in Document:

Cite This Term Paper:

"School Response To Student Suicide" (2003, August 08) Retrieved June 22, 2017, from
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-response-to-student-suicide-152699

"School Response To Student Suicide" 08 August 2003. Web.22 June. 2017. <
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-response-to-student-suicide-152699>

"School Response To Student Suicide", 08 August 2003, Accessed.22 June. 2017,
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-response-to-student-suicide-152699