Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
School Voucher System
School voucher grants by the governments serve the purpose of improving educational standard of the children who belong to low-income families. This system is aimed to provide school tuition that can be paid to both public and private schools. The inspiration behind school vouchers system is to present to parents an open choice of educational institutions and approaches for their children. Another idea behind this system is to pressurize public schools to compete with the private schools and provide a better educational culture for their students. In the United States of America, the first school-voucher program was instituted in 1990 in Milwaukee, Wis., that was funded by the state. Later in 1995, a federal bill was proposed to set up pilot school-voucher plans in twenty six cities ("school vouchers").
However, school vouchers (also known as opportunity scholarships) have been a hot issue since their system's inception. According to the critics of this concept, this system can eventually destroy the American public-school system if applied extensively. The federal authorities failed to deal with the matter of the constitutionality of taxpayer-financed vouchers in 1998 when the Supreme Court decided to avoid the assessment of a state court ruling that advocated the use of vouchers in Milwaukee. By the end of the twentieth century, a mixture of voucher programs were being put into operation in thirty-one American states and about 65,000 students utilized this system. As a matter of fact, there is no undeniable substantiation that the vouchers usage by the low-income families has improved the education of students, either at private or public schools. Similarly, it is also not clear whether poor educational results are the blunder of the schools or the consequence of other reasons ("school vouchers").
School voucher systems are of different kinds. However, all of them are engaged in paying state or federal money to the parents/guardians of private school children in order to make up for the price/fee of tuition, books, or other educational everyday expenditures. In general, such systems offer tuition vouchers to any parent who want his/her child to go to a private school, religious or else. The voucher proponents support the idea that such reforms have a great tendency to help schools achieve academic excellence. However, it is important for the private schools to essentially meet minimum standards that are being established by the legislatures for the acceptance of voucher recipients. These standards are different in each state and may require the participation of schools to "administer state assessments, receive accreditation from an accreditation agency or publish voucher student performance data" ("School Choice: Vouchers").
Strictures for student eligibility have also been proposed by the legislatures that usually target subgroups of students. These include low-income students that meet a particular income threshold, students who go to constantly low performing schools, disabled students, or students belonging to military families or foster care. Thus, legislators put eligibility prerequisites for students and grant vouchers, as a rule, to the students who either have a definite household income or who have exceptional needs ("School Choice: Vouchers").
How School Vouchers Affect Academic Outcomes?
School vouchers could have an effect on the academic outcomes in four main ways. Firstly, the competition induced by the voucher system can play a major role in the improvement of teaching standards and associated services. Secondly, vouchers could result in superior independence and self-sufficiency in the school sector (principally by increasing the number of private schools). According to the advocates of voucher system, this can result ultimately in the improvement of school services as schools with greater self-sufficiency are more reactive to the needs and requests of students and parents. Thirdly, vouchers can help in the redistribution of resources between public and government schools and also between affluent and deprived private schools. This effect of resources can have repercussions for the levels of educational and intellectual achievement. Last but not the least, greater categorization and segregation on account of academic ability and socio-economic status can be caused by the vouchers (Macintosh & Wilkinson x). This sorting can eventually "drag down the average level of academic achievement and lead to greater inequality in student outcomes because of 'peer effects' (i.e. The notion that the composition of a school's student body has an influence on individual student outcomes)" (Macintosh & Wilkinson x).
How School Vouchers Affect Non-Academic Outcomes?
The school voucher system can consequently result in schools offering a variety of non-academic services for students that are more directly associated with the parental preferences. A…[continue]
"School Voucher System" (2012, December 02) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-voucher-system-106394
"School Voucher System" 02 December 2012. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-voucher-system-106394>
"School Voucher System", 02 December 2012, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/school-voucher-system-106394
Schools operating in rich areas will ask more than the basic voucher price, while schools operating in the most difficult circumstances, dealing with socially excluded groups will be restricted to the basic voucher amount. Funds should be targeted to schools that need them, not schools who are already succeeding. Another disadvantage is that education cannot be a market. Supply cannot adjust fast enough to changing demand so some pupils will
With 6,153,000 covered under the IDEA, schools are eligible to receive $18.01 billion federal funds. Regrettably, schools are just receiving a paltry $7.5 billon. (National Education Association: IDEA Funding Coalition Offers Proposal -Plan would make funding mandatory) To look at it in another way schools are at present receiving just approximately 17% rather than the federal commitment of 40% of APPE. Even though that is a considerable amount, schools will
Education Class Size vs. School Vouchers on the Achievement of Minority Students The continuous achievement gap between African-American students and their white peers is a major problem in American education. The gap in fourth-grade reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) diminished in the 1970s, but since the early 1980s it has remained unchanged. Evidence from many studies suggests that African-American students may benefit more than other students from improvement in
School Choice Throughout the nation the American public has clamored for school change and reform. One of the alternatives that has moved to the forefront of the arena is the ability of parents to choose the public school that their children will attend without geographic boundaries and mandates. Experts continue to debate whether or not school choice ability will force the hand of the public school system to make the desired changes.
School Finance: Its Economics and Politics School financing in America Revenue sources for federal and state governments Judicial reviews of school finance policy with evolving standards of equality School-based decision making Family choice of schooling Reform of schooling-finance Providing equality in educational opportunities to all is one of the cornerstones of American democracy. The founding fathers of America were aware of the necessity of having a population, which is educated since it enables an opportunity for all
These issues of professionalism and innovation seem to be a major problem in many public schools in America. In recent years these issues have come to light as teachers have been disciplined and even fired for their interactions with students that have been unprofessional and even criminal at times. Teachers have an ethical responsibility to act professionally and when they fell to do so the ability of students to
Her point is to get support for her views, and she did, because three months after she wrote this piece there was a rally at the State Capitol in Austin where 5,000 people called for school choice in front of the Capitol building. Therefore, her words helped people make up their minds and seek action from their legislators. However, she failed to convince the legislators, who did not even