Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Spanking has been a form of corporal punishment for centuries. Before psychological research on the topic expanded and was made public, it was just an accepted way of teaching children how to behave. However, recently the negative side of spanking has been revealed. Analysis conducted on adults who have experienced spanking as children have proven that the negative aspects of these acts of physical harm are quite real. Though the issue of spanking has been a hot-button topic over the years, it has been proven that spanking can cause long-lasting physical and psychological damage to the child, is sprung from parental anger and not discipline, and is a common denominator among current criminals. It is these effects that shine light on the growing psychopathy that spanking is causing children. These impacts guide children's moral development, therefore widely affecting how these children grow up and act once they reach the full adult age. Based on information obtained from various sources, the act of spanking can be one of the most detrimental experiences that a child can go through.
Spanking children causes long-lasting physical and psychological effects on children. Children who are constantly exposed to forms of violence such as spanking do not learn to deal with situations in a calm rational manner (Nofziger, 2008). Most parents start spanking at a very early age. Although the thought behind this is to teach discipline from an early age, it in fact makes the psychological damage even worse for the children (Rodriguez & Richardson, 2007). At that age, children cognitively cannot connect their action to the spanking that they are receiving from their parents, and therefore all that they are exposed to is the parent's anger.
The psychological damage attained during this vital period of cognitive growth can be extensive and severe if the spanking is extensive and severe. Children who are spanked early on do not develop to the full extent of their cognitive ability (Kazdin & Benjet, 2003). They become stunted and are constantly behind in their respective developmental stage. Cognitively stunted and emotionally imbalanced, children who are spanked are at a disadvantage from those children who are not disciplined through corporal punishment. Children who receive spankings do not learn how to regulate their emotions. They are taught that acting out in a form of anger is an acceptable way of handling problems and situations of conflict (Taylor, Manganello, Lee, & Rice, 2010). This psychological train of thought is imprinted as a normal schema, gravely affecting the child's emotional state and cognitive understanding of the world.
Spanking essentially becomes a lashing out of the parent's sentiments. It is a sign that they are no longer in control of their emotions and choose to rather use spanking as a method of gaining control once again (Stacks, Oshio, Gerard, & Roe, 2009). Once a parent reaches the point that they have to resort to physical harm to their children, they have built up so many emotions, so much anger about the situation, that their response to spank the child is a reflection of their own emotions. Parents choose to incorporate spanking into their parenting styles because they have their own anger problems, and not necessarily because of a discipline problem (Rodriguez & Richardson, 2007). Although discipline may be the reasoning or used as an excuse to hide their spanking, it is the anger that eventually leads parents to commit the actual act. The inability to self-regulate emotions on the parent's part is what inevitably leads to the perceived excused spanking. By utilizing discipline as an excuse for the actual psychological and emotional disarray that the parents are going through, they are able to get their actions excused.
Parents who are least able to control their own emotions end up attempting to control the emotions and behaviors of their own children. This is done so by implementing more severe punishment when children do not behave as well as the parent would want them to. It is the ultimate sign of power for parents who are emotionally disturbed themselves (Benjet & Kazdin, 2003). Being unable to control oneself emotionally during a time of extreme stress may build up to a point where it needs to be released. At this point parents have lost their ability to regulate an appropriate response to the situation and end up spanking their child as a result. Much research has been done in this area and it has concluded that the need to implement corporal punishment, or spanking, may come from a parent's emotional and psychological state and inability to control their own anger (Rodriguez & Richardson, 2007). This is what contributes to the act of spanking; not the widely accepted theory of spanking as an excused form of discipline. Although spanking may have been dismissed and accepted at one point, the outcome that this has caused has prevented this act from gaining further support.
Individuals who are spanked as children are more likely to end up participating in delinquent and criminal acts. Children who experience spanking as a regular and normal way of accepting physical harm grow up thinking that hurting other people is the correct way to teach others how to behave or listen to what they have to say (Kazdin & Benjet, 2003). Children are desensitized to the idea of violence and falsely accept that it is a normal way of behaving. This leads to their inability to sense the wrong in hurting other individuals. This in itself leads to a greater predisposition to violent behaviors leading to delinquency and criminality (Turner & Muller, 2004). A large portion of offenders who are imprisoned for numerous varying crimes had experienced some degree of spanking in their childhood (Kazdin & Benjet, 2003). These spankings or physical harm ranged in intensity from moderate to severe.
Experiencing spanking as a child also predisposes children to more spontaneous, abrupt, and aggressive behavior (Stacks, Oshio, Gerard, & Roe, 2009). These are all factors that could inevitably lead to criminal acts. The inability to maintain impulse control in the parent by spanking the child in the first place, is then mimicked by the individual that was spanked as a child (Nofziger, 2008). This leads to acts of violence, lack of compassion for others, and inability to self-regulate -- all factors that if combined lead to the ability to go through with criminal acts. Adults who are in prison and were spanked as a child were predisposed to aggressive behaviors, making them excuse their own violent acts. Because spanking causes an increase in aggressive tendencies, adults who were spanked as children are more likely to commit criminal acts as is seen by the data presenting how many current prisoners report corporal punishment as children and saw it as a normal occurrence (Stacks, Oshio, Gerard, & Roe, 2009). It is this same attitude that leads them to commit the acts that landed them in prison in the first place. Because of this increased predisposition to aggression and negative modeling there are a large percentage of criminals who were spanked as children.
Spanking may have once been accepted as a proper form of disciplining children. But in the recent decades research has been indicating that spanking in fact creates more harm than good. As a consequence of this type of corporal punishment, children are more likely to have physical and psychologically damaging effects. Parents who implement spanking as a form of punishment is not necessarily doing so because of a desire to discipline; it is because of their inability to control their own emotional state, impulsivity, and anger. The consequence of spanking on children is their predisposition to criminality, as a large portion of incarcerated individuals experienced some sort of corporal punishment, mostly in the form of spanking that ranged from moderate to severe. Based upon…[continue]
"Spanking Children" (2013, April 16) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/spanking-children-89662
"Spanking Children" 16 April 2013. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/spanking-children-89662>
"Spanking Children", 16 April 2013, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/spanking-children-89662
Spanking Children Should Not Be Spanked in Order to Discipline Them for Negative Behavior Spanking has been used by parents for generations, and various forms of corporal punishment have been deployed for disciplinary measures for centuries. However, the enduring popularity of spanking as a method for disciplining children does not mean that it accomplishes the task it endeavors to achieve. Indeed, spanking has many negative potential consequences that make it an unfavorable
Spanking DISCIPLINE vs. AGGRESSION Imagine a child doing anything he wants as he grows up and parents only mildly warning him against the ill consequences of certain acts or situations. We all know that a child is launched into this world, not knowing what acts are safe or unsafe and naturally needing not just guidance and protection but also his parents' intervention. Every child wants to explore and is instinctively stubborn and
281). Those regularly spanked children were also six times more likely to "become juvenile delinquents, and later as adults, to use physical violence against their spouses"; it is also asserted in the research that those same children tended towards "sadomasochistic" behaviors and were known to suffer from depression (Chang, p. 281). The difference between physical punishment and "abuse" is significant, according to Chang. Physical punishment is meant to cause pain
spanking is an approved method of discipline in the schoolroom. Spanking is a controversial form of punishment, and many people do not believe in spanking as a discipline measure. However, spanking does have a place in the discipline of a child if it is used correctly. Spanking Families have used spanking as a method of disciplining children for centuries, and it has been used in school systems as a punishment, as
Child abuse maltreatment limited an age occur infant, toddler, preschool, school-age years. Choose age groups (infant, toddler, preschool, school age) discuss types abuse age. Discuss warning signs physical emotional assessment findings nurse child abuse. Reporting suspected child abuse: The nurses' dilemma Accusing a parent or other relative of child abuse is a serious allegation, and nurses are understandably often reluctant to take such a step. Common signs of child abuse in school-age
Spanking Perhaps no topic generates as much heated debate among parents and child development experts as corporal punishment. While defenders argue for the continued necessity of the practice, new research shows more clearly the benefits of sparing the rod and avoiding corporal punishment altogether. These studies cite numerous reasons against corporal punishment, from increasing aggression in children to the practice's moral repugnance. This paper, however, focuses on studies that show corporal punishment
These findings are consistent with those reported in studies of children older than 2 years but extend these findings to children who are spanked beginning at a relatively early age (Wissow Pp). In the January 2002 issue of "Journal of Counseling and Development," Lisa Fontes states that Latino parents who engage in harsh physical discipline need help, however, they are far from homogeneous and their needs vary (Fontes Pp). She