Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In modern terminology, and for foreign policy, political science and international law, crimes against humanity are any atrocious act committed on a large scale. They can be prosecuted in most any Federal Court System, depending on where they occurred and which population was part of the criminal activity. The implication for international law is that crimes against humanity are subject to universal jurisdiction, which means that States can exercise their own jurisdiction regardless of where the crime was committed, and that all States also have the obligation and duty to assist each other in the defense of these sorts of activities. It is also important to note that no human, regardless of affiliation, is immune from prosecution, even heads of state, and on person can plead a defense as obeying orders.
Part 3 -- Is it legally justified to invade/occupy another country in the name of arresting/hitting terrorists? International cooperation regarding the arresting or bringing to justice those suspected of being involved in terrorist activities began in the 1960s and revolved around airline hijackings. Several notable events occurred to solidify international laws: the 1985 seizure of the cruise liner the Achille Lauro, the hijacking of TWA flight 847, the 1972 Munich Olympics issue, at sea piracy, and of course, the events of 9/11.
There are really two issues surrounding this question: 1) international cooperation in the aiding of capture and extradition of suspected terrorists, and 2) the legality of entering a sovereign nation who refuses to cooperate internationally. First, countries that belong to the United Nations...
In this sense, it is legal to share in law enforcement efforts to capture suspected terrorists as long as the host country allows other military, para-military or law enforcement agencies to operate on their soil.
A combination of the United Nations, International law signatories, and the Hague Conventions are designed to adjudicate crimes against humanity and bring criminals to justice in the international scope. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (e.g. 1948) does give a limited general authority to enter a sovereign nation if the United Nations legally decrees that nation is in violation of international law. For country a to simply send a force to country B. To extradite suspected terrorists without first engaging in International Law would not be legal without appropriate resolutions issued by a recognized international authority and would likely be considered an act of war. It is really the circumstances that justify what can happen -- with variables of breadth of the attack (how many countries involved), seriousness, potential for success, and the view of the international community.
Sources:
Dyson, W. (2012). Terrorism: An Investigator's Handbook. Waltham, MA: Anderson
Publishing.
McCormack, W. (2007). Understanding the Law of Terrorism. New York: Lexis Nexis.
Title of agency, not plagiarized
Sources:
Dyson, W. (2012). Terrorism: An Investigator's Handbook. Waltham, MA: Anderson
Publishing.
McCormack, W. (2007). Understanding the Law of Terrorism. New York: Lexis Nexis.
Title of agency, not plagiarized
Terrorism refers to threats, violence, bombings, etc. Terrorism is known to have a long history, but even today, the reason behind this terror by the super powers and the government remains explicit. The acts of terror are very common these days and could be found in current political and social environment. A part of terror is still confused when it is applied in the actual present world (Robb, 2007). Where the
Terrorism shares features in common with irregular warfare, insurgency, and crime. Like crime, terrorism violates the law and infringes on the rights of others. Like insurgency, terrorism "appeals as a weapon of the weak," (Arquilla, Ronfelt & Zanini 1999, p. 134). Similarly, Arquilla et al. (1999) note that terrorism "has appealed as a way to assert identity and command attention," (p. 134). Like irregular warfare, terrorism is asynchronous and asymmetrical,
nomadic tribes wreaking havoc on each other to Zealots of Judea and the original Assassins, terrorism has been a part of human political strategy since the origin of the species. Whether it reflects the innate bellicosity of human beings or simply reveals the effects of class or religious conflict, terrorism is an unfortunate part of life -- even daily life for some people. Advanced weaponry and communications technology has
Terrorism The term "terrorism" is profoundly political, as can be seen by the numerous definitions of terrorism and the lack of a globally-agreed description. The myriad definitions show nations struggling to define "terrorism" in self-serving ways. Efforts to clarify and unify those definitions vary from legalistic to nearly bombastic. After listing many definitions from different nations and from within the United States, itself, this paper examines a legalistic attempt to lay
Terrorism is at this point one of the main threats that decision makers in the field of national security have to deal with especially in the United States. The issue has been raised mainly after the events from 9/11 2001, but have been a constant concern for the law enforcement agencies since the beginning of the 90s and even before. The United States have a particular way in which it
They are bombarded with information concerning the crimes performed by a certain community and they come to believe that it is important for them to act the respective community regardless of the aftermath. Women terrorists practically act against the generally accepted belief that women are non-violent. The reality is that many women become terrorists and governments need to take this concept into consideration in order to be able to effectively