Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
At this point it should be clear that there are no good reasons to oppose the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and only good reasons for supporting. Opposition to the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research can only be justified by an appeal to unreasonable and arbitrary moral standards based not on logic, reason, or concern for human well-being, but rather on the dictates of outdated and dangerous religious beliefs. This opposition ultimately values the potential for human life over actual human life, so that, in a perverse twist, the very people claiming to be standing up for the sanctity of life are actually the ones most responsible for continued suffering and death. They pretend that an embryo has the same rights and moral standing as an actual human, and in doing so, they actually devalue the lives of real people suffering from real diseases. In contrast, the arguments in favor of embryonic stem cell research are based on the simple fact that this research has the proven potential to greatly improve health and wellness going forward. In addition, this research represents a worthwhile investment, because advancements in the treatment of diseases associated with old age will serve to reduce the societal cost of an aging population while improving the lives of countless humans. As a...
CIRCUIT VACATES DISTRICT COURT's PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION of
FEDERAL FUNDING for RESEARCH USING HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM
CELLS. --Sherley V. Sebelius, 644 F.3D 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011)." Harvard Law Review
125.2 (2011): 626-633.
Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir, et al. "Stem Cell Therapy in Treatment of Different Diseases." Acta
Medica Iranica 50.2 (2012): 79-96.
Kollmann, Maite S. "Taking the Moral High Road: Why Embryonic Stem Cell Research Should
Be Strictly Regulated." Faulkner Law Review 2.1 (2010): 145-192.
Robertson, John a. "Embryo Stem Cell Research: Ten Years of Controversy." Journal of Law,
Medicine & Ethics 38.2 (2010): 191-203.
Smith, Alexander Thomas T. "Faith, Science and the Political Imagination: Moderate
Republicans and the Politics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research." Sociological Review
58.4 (2010): 623-637.
Works Cited
"CIVIL LAW -- FEDERAL FUNDING of HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
-- D.C. CIRCUIT VACATES DISTRICT COURT's PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION of
FEDERAL FUNDING for RESEARCH USING HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM
CELLS. --Sherley V. Sebelius, 644 F.3D 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011)." Harvard Law Review
In this light, it is argued that use of surplus blastocysts otherwise disregarded after in vitro fertilization might be less instrumental and less questionable than working with specifically designated embryos. Yet, the fact that surplus IVF embryos are unwanted does not mark them as less human, the ethical implication being that humans have rights regardless if they are wanted or not. On the other hand, adult skin tissue-originated, induced
In the case of embryonic stem cell research, it would be the responsibility of legislators to identify the specific types of potential harms that would justify limitations on research or on research funding available through public funds. Given the uncontested fact that embryonic stem cell research applications have the potential to eliminate the need for organ transplantation, to regenerate limbs lost in traumatic amputations, to restore movement in cases of
but, Cuomo continued, Bush's position "…remains a minority view" (Hurlbut, 822). Christine Todd Whitman, who served Bush as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in Bush's first term (she served from January 2001 to May 2003), and was the first female governor of New Jersey, supported embryonic stem cell research. Whitman noted in her book that right after Bush was re-elected in 2004, Christian conservative organizer Phil Burress was heard
Stem Cell Research Should Have More Government Funding The topic argument "Stem cell research government funding." For paper, construct argument defending a claim policy. Remember argument based a claim policy, writer seeks solve a problem establish a problem exists, part argument entail claims fact Stem cell research should have more government funding A stem cell can be defined as type of cell that can be found in many body tissues. Stem cells can
Stem Cell Research The Legal Argument and Analysis for Stem Cell Research Stem cell research is a new field of research that brings many ethical issues and considerations in which U.S. regulations have been mostly hostile while around the world, the response toward the research has been positive. What is the legal culture in which the U.S. finds itself regarding stem cell research? What are the ethical considerations involving our participation in
Stem cell research has generated much media attention in the last decade. Stem cells are a specific type of cell in the human body that can develop in many different types of cell types during the early life growth (NIH, 2010). Stem cells are used today for the treatment of some diseases and scientists are hoping in the future it will be able to cure much more. At this point