Usability The Internet Is Now Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1576
Cite

Library hi-tech 20, no. 2 (January 1): 169. http://www.proquest.com. (Accessed 12 April 2008). Donoghue.A (2004). Web accessibility drive for UK government websites. Macromedia hoping to cash in. Published:

Friday 18 June 2004. Available from: www.silicon.com (Accessedon 19 February 2008)

EUD (2003). European Union of the Deaf (EUD). Available at http://www.eudeaf2003.org (Accessedon 21 February 2008)

King, JW Thatcher, PM Bronstad, R Easton. 2005. Managing usability for people with disabilities in a large Web presence. IBM Systems Journal 44, no. 3 (January 1): 519-535. http://www.proquest.com (accessed10 April 2008).

Bambang Parmanto, Xiaoming Zeng. 2005. Metric for Web accessibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56, no. 13 (November 1): 1394-1404. http://www.proquest.com (accessed11 April 2008).

Pieper, Michael, Hermsdorf, Dirk. 1997. BSCW for disabled teleworkers: Usability evaluation and interface adaptation of an internet-based cooperation environment. Computer Networks & ISDN Systems 29, no. 8-13...

...

http://www.proquest.com (accessed17 April 2008).
Catherine Russell 2003. Access to technology for the disabled: the forgotten legacy of innovation? Information & Communications Technology Law 12, no. 3 (October 1): 237-246. http://www.proquest.com (accessed12 April 2008).

Matthew Saltzman 2006. Web Access for the Disabled. or-MS Today 33, no. 5 (October 1): 8. http://www.proquest.com (accessed16April 16, 2008).

Stu Westin 2005. Cutting Curbs on the Information Highway: Embracing Adaptive Technology to Broaden the Web. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 17, no. 3 (July 1): i-x. http://www.proquest.com (accessed12 April 2008).

Peter Williams, Hamid R. Jamali, David Nicholas. 2006. Using ICT with people with special education needs: what the literature tells us. Aslib Proceedings

58, no. 4 (July 1): 330-345. http://www.proquest.com (accessed16 April 2008).

W3C (2006). Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility: Overview. Web Accessibility initiative. Available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval.(Accessedon 15 April 2008)

Sources Used in Documents:

References

David Bowen 2004. Why the disabled can help build better sites - for all: [SURVEYS EDITION]. Financial Times, June 9, http://www.proquest.com (Accessed 7 April 2008).

Suzanne L. Byerley, Mary Beth Chambers. 2002. Accessibility and usability of Web-based library databases for non-visual users. Library hi-tech 20, no. 2 (January 1): 169. http://www.proquest.com. (Accessed 12 April 2008).

Donoghue.A (2004). Web accessibility drive for UK government websites. Macromedia hoping to cash in. Published:

Friday 18 June 2004. Available from: www.silicon.com (Accessedon 19 February 2008)
EUD (2003). European Union of the Deaf (EUD). Available at http://www.eudeaf2003.org (Accessedon 21 February 2008)
King, JW Thatcher, PM Bronstad, R Easton. 2005. Managing usability for people with disabilities in a large Web presence. IBM Systems Journal 44, no. 3 (January 1): 519-535. http://www.proquest.com (accessed10 April 2008).
Bambang Parmanto, Xiaoming Zeng. 2005. Metric for Web accessibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56, no. 13 (November 1): 1394-1404. http://www.proquest.com (accessed11 April 2008).
Pieper, Michael, Hermsdorf, Dirk. 1997. BSCW for disabled teleworkers: Usability evaluation and interface adaptation of an internet-based cooperation environment. Computer Networks & ISDN Systems 29, no. 8-13 (September 1): 1479-1487. http://www.proquest.com (accessed17 April 2008).
Catherine Russell 2003. Access to technology for the disabled: the forgotten legacy of innovation? Information & Communications Technology Law 12, no. 3 (October 1): 237-246. http://www.proquest.com (accessed12 April 2008).
Matthew Saltzman 2006. Web Access for the Disabled. or-MS Today 33, no. 5 (October 1): 8. http://www.proquest.com (accessed16April 16, 2008).
Stu Westin 2005. Cutting Curbs on the Information Highway: Embracing Adaptive Technology to Broaden the Web. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 17, no. 3 (July 1): i-x. http://www.proquest.com (accessed12 April 2008).
58, no. 4 (July 1): 330-345. http://www.proquest.com (accessed16 April 2008).
W3C (2006). Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility: Overview. Web Accessibility initiative. Available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval.(Accessedon 15 April 2008)


Cite this Document:

"Usability The Internet Is Now" (2008, April 17) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-the-internet-is-now-30610

"Usability The Internet Is Now" 17 April 2008. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-the-internet-is-now-30610>

"Usability The Internet Is Now", 17 April 2008, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/usability-the-internet-is-now-30610

Related Documents

Internet Marketing Strategy of Argos The purpose of this essay is to examine the Internet marketing strategy of Argos. Argos is a home retail group and market leader in retail sales of home and general merchandise. Argos reports that it is a "unique multi-channel retailer recognized for choice, value, and convenience." (Argos Website, 2011) Argos and the Online Market: Size and Growth Argos customer base is approximately 130 million and reports state that

The market was not ready for wireless even five years ago, but that has definitely changed. When Levi's launched its latest 501s marketing campaign earlier this year, a wireless site was a central part of its digital strategy. Now there are nearly 30,000 public wireless "hot spots" in the United States. Advertisers believe that now that wireless has finally become a medium with which consumers are comfortable, the next

With the widespread use of such technologies, we require greater understanding of the personal and social attributes that affect why people use computer-mediated communication (CMC) and the outcomes of CMC-related behavior." (Papacharissi & Rubin, 2000) Barriers and Issues The most fundamental concern in the refurbishment building's networking and VoIP proposal is also the industry's most basic barriers to accomplishing the goal of networking success. In other words, instituting a highly efficient

Usability Testing and Implementation The intent of this analysis is to evaluate the usability of these three websites, each of which have innate strengths and weaknesses in their design and navigation. The three websites are http://www.usability.gov /, http://www.useit.com/jakob / and http://www.transparencynow.com/index.html . Using the foundation of a usability framework, each of the three websites have been evaluated both for use on traditional personal computers and also on mobile devices. Usability criterion for

Internet & Electronic Marketing Website & Business Model Target Market & Consumer Behavior Building & Maintaining Customer Relationships F. Recommendations for Website Improvement G. Conclusion H. References Pace University is a comprehensive non-profit university that offers its educational services to online students and to the more traditional brick-and-mortar student. As the university competes with global universities, the web presence must convey the value and quality of the education as well as enable the student to make an

usability, affordability, and ubiquity of email cannot be denied. However, along with these benefits come some significant issues that companies must be aware of and try to address. Information overflow, misuse that replaces more appropriate forms of communication, amplified security exposure, right to privacy concerns, and negative implications for work practices represent the dark side of email Email extensions such as alias and distribution lists combined with the near zero