Wartime Embedded Journalists There Have Been War Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1361
Cite
Related Topics:

Wartime Embedded Journalists There have been war correspondents in virtually every U.S. military engagement. During the Civil War, a photographer named Matthew Brady was out there on the battlefield not exactly snapping pictures, but laboriously preparing the glass plates in the back of his horse-drawn darkroom. So embedding journalists in with the U.S. military during the recent, and continuing, war in Iraq would not seem to be any different, and certainly no more dangerous than having Brady rattling around the cannonballs. Granted, some journalists have died in Iraq, but some, like NBC's David Bloom, died from medical conditions not related to warfare. Even military spokespersons have relatively little to say about the impact on troops of protecting journalists' lives. Of course, the few soldiers who died in the relatively few attempts to save journalists in war zones, some of which will be mentioned below, might have a very different viewpoint about that.

Writing in Military Review, Colonel Tammy Miracle noted that the responsibility for protecting journalists was a consideration. " 'How does a soldier keep a 'gung-ho' reporter from crossing the line into danger to get that Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph? What happens if a journalist is taken prisoner'?" she asked. (Miracle, 2003) In fact, the dilemma is much less thorny than one might think. She points out that under the 1949 Geneva Convention, journalists who are accredited and traveling with a military unit are to be considered part of the military and would thus have to be treated like prisoners of war. She noted, too, that under current Pentagon guidelines, embedded journalists may not carry weapons, use a personal vehicle or break away from the military unit. (Miracle, 2003) One would have to conclude, then, that the embedded journalist is just so much more equipment for the troops; as they troops protect themselves in battle, so they would protect the embeds. Soldiers don't want to get killed any more than anyone else does.

And some news organizations chose wisely about whom they sent. CNN sent a former Marine reservist who was one of their correspondents...

...

That enabled him to file knowledgeable reports, and also gain some credibility with his military informants and 'protectors' as well as a history of knowing how to obey orders. (Zinsmeister, 2003) But there are, of course, journalists who fail to obey the rules, and those are the ones that cause immediate 'harm's way' rescues for the military, and who also tend to 'spill the beans' when they shouldn't endangering the whole operation.
Miracle noted that bureau chiefs and network executives usually cry for help when aggressive journalists get themselves in a pickle, faster than the journalists themselves. And she cited several instances:

During the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989, journalists were trapped in the Marriott hotel. The U.S. military rescued the journalist; three soldiers were seriously wounded, and a Spanish photographer was killed.

Before Operation Iraqi Freedom, 300 to 500 news organizations booked in at the Al Rashid Hotel in Baghdad. They were told that the military couldn't, at that point, order them out. But they were also warned the military couldn't swoop in and rescue them if they got caught in the crossfire. (Miracle, 2003)

In fact, during the first week of Operation Iraqi Freedom, four journalists were killed, but none was an embed. In the Afghani operations in 2001, 8 journalists died, and the British newspaper The Guardian reported that the Taliban had set a bounty of $50,000 on the head of journalists to be collected by anyone who killed one. (Miracle, 2003)

So there is some danger to journalists, and some extra danger to troops who have to rescue them, although it appears the danger is diminished as long as the embeds stick with the troops where they belong, instead of conducting independent operations when they've agreed not to.

Miracle, and most other commentators, believe that the real danger to U.S. troops is not in the moment-to-moment conveying of journalists to the battlefield in jeeps at the rear of the column. The real danger is in what the embedded troops might…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Gorman, Steve. "Geraldo Rivera Leaving Iraq in Flap with Pentagon." Reuters Entertainment, April 1, 2003.

Miracle, Tammy L. "The army and embedded media." Military Review, 1 September 2003.

TV correspondent Peter Arnett sacked for comments about Iraq war." Agence France Presse, 31 March 2003.

Zinsmeister, Karl. "They're in the Army Now: Not really. Most 'embedded' journalists are fish out of water." National Review, 21 April 2003.


Cite this Document:

"Wartime Embedded Journalists There Have Been War" (2004, March 17) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/wartime-embedded-journalists-there-have-164903

"Wartime Embedded Journalists There Have Been War" 17 March 2004. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/wartime-embedded-journalists-there-have-164903>

"Wartime Embedded Journalists There Have Been War", 17 March 2004, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/wartime-embedded-journalists-there-have-164903

Related Documents

The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, (George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan. 28, 2003) the claims were quickly picked up and repeated by the media. So were claims that Iraq had nuclear weapons. "We believe [Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." (Dick Cheney, NBC's Meet the Press, March 16, 2003) Yet, after the search for

Underground Railroad was the single most important nonviolent political protest movement in nineteenth century America. Slave rebellions did help to rally the cause for self-empowerment and abolition, but the Underground Railroad led to meaningful, tangible results. The descendants of former slaves who made it to Canada have shaped the fabric of that nation, while the descendants of the former slaves to achieved liberty in their lifetime and lived to tell

Unlike other wars, this was not against the armies of a nation, but a cohort of individuals who were driven by an ideology (Islamism). This army knew no boundaries and did not use conventional tactics of war fare. Even when the Taliban were imprisoned, the media first reasoned and then insisted that the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war applied to these prisoners. Bill Maher, comedian,

57). Coker's article (published in a very conservative magazine in England) "reflected unease among some of his colleagues" about that new course at LSEP. Moreover, Coker disputes that fact that there is a female alternative to male behavior and Coker insists that "Whether they love or hate humanity, feminists seem unable to look it in the face" (Smith quoting Coker, p. 58). If feminists are right about the female nature being

Dubus's ordering of events in the story? how would the effects be different if the story were told in a chronological order? It is important that Dubus begin the story with the recounting of Matt burying his son. There is something potent and symbolic about a parent burying a child who dies as a homicide victim. The reader is set up to expect that Matt will want revenge, or the

Ethnic, racial and class minorities in the city of New York, as well as middle class and organized crime people enjoyed their fight against Prohibition in an amazing number of locals and nightclubs that summed up to more than thirty thousand. While many restaurant closed down in New York, speakeasies spread across the city. More and more of the middle class and the upper class "embraced the cosmopolitan culture