West Virginia State Board Of Thesis

It would seem that involuntary affirmation could be commanded only on even more immediate and urgent grounds than silence." West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 633 (1943). . Analysis: The Court determined that the case raised a substantial federal question because the Gobitis decision was determined on the grounds of religious freedom, while this case was challenged under the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. The Court differentiated this case from Hamilton v. Regents, 293 U.S. 245 (1934), which permitted states to require military training as part of college enrollment, because college enrollment was not compulsory. The Court determined that saluting a flag was symbolic speech, which could not be compelled absent an imminent threat of some type of serious harm, if it could be compelled at all. More significantly, the Court did not see this dispute as a religious issue. The Court acknowledged that the students in this particular case were...

...

However, the Court also recognized that people could have equally-valid non-religious reasons to object to the forced salute. Because the Court found that the Board did not have the power to make the salute a legal duty, it did not have to determine whether a non-religious objection would merit the same protection as a religious objection. Instead, the Court resolved this case by looking at the First Amendment's guarantees of freedom of speech and how that related to freedom from compulsory speech.
Conclusion: The Court overruled West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, and determined that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment protected students from being forced to salute the American flag or being forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Hamilton v. Regents, 293 U.S. 245 (1934).

Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940).

Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931).

West Virginia State Board v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).


Cite this Document:

"West Virginia State Board Of" (2009, November 05) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/west-virginia-state-board-of-17825

"West Virginia State Board Of" 05 November 2009. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/west-virginia-state-board-of-17825>

"West Virginia State Board Of", 05 November 2009, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/west-virginia-state-board-of-17825

Related Documents

Nursing Practice Act of Virginia: The scope of practice in medicine, nursing, law, dentistry, and various other disciplines are usually established and regulated at the state level. This implies that the legislative body in every state establishes practice law and allocates authority for the implementation of the law to suitable regulatory agencies and boards. In relation to the nursing field, the established laws are usually in the form of professional practice

Public School Prayer: Is it Constitutional and Moral? Proponents of allowing public school prayer cite both legal and moral reasons to allow prayer in public schools. On a legal basis they state that banning prayer in public schools is a violation of our First Amendment right of Free Exercise. From a moral standpoint they cite the so-called degeneration of the public school system and the so-called declining quality of public education

The issue of free speech and the ability of a group to exempt itself from the requirements of public education is at the heart of the issue of the question: can a group of religious fundamentalists petition the state to allow their children an exemption from school biology classes that, they believe, are contrary to their religious views (one would presuppose evolutionary theory?) First, an argument to exempt a child

" (O'Leary, 41) Later the words "the flag of the United States" was added to it during the world war. Later the period between the wars saw the persecution of the Jehovah's Witnesses occurred because they refused to salute the flag and follow the "100% Americanism." However far back in 1943, the court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette made the loyalty oath unconstitutional. It was on

Legal Prices: Collect information minimum wage. State purpose legal price, assess impact market labor, evaluate extent achieves purpose. List Resources: Bureau Economic Analysis - http://bea. Evaluating legal prices: The minimum wage The modern day employee is viewed as the most valuable organizational asset and sits at the core of the company's ability to attain its overall objectives. In such a setting then, the employers compete for the best skilled and qualified

Conflict Resolution: Analysis of the Virginia Tech Shootings This paper examines the horrible tragedy that struck Virginia Tech on that took place on April 16, 2007. This paper goes on to examine things such as the delays of reporting the correct information of the shooting at its early stages to the poor security that was put in operation. It also explores the life of disturbed student and what possibly led up