Work and Organisation Improving the Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

(Consensus Decision-Making: g8-binder.emmett)

According to laboratory studies undertaken by Professors Martin Kocher and Matthias Sutter reported in the Economic Journal, it was revealed that teams definitely surpass individuals in arriving at economic decision-making. The two researchers demonstrate that the type of decision maker- an individual or a team makes a vital difference in an interactive economic environment, regardless of it being the investment and marketing strategies of companies and funds managers or the budget and monetary policy-making of governments and central banks. Small teams take efficient decisions compared to decisions taken at the individual level as they work better at processing information and better at other decision-makers choices. The mounting relevance of teams in firms, consulting and decision-making in general makes these findings very pertinent. (Teams Make Better Decisions than Individuals)

Consensus in its true sense implies fulfilling the needs of everybody. Consensus decision-making is planned to negate the responsibilities of sections or parties and promote the expression of individuals concerns. The technique also enhances the possibilities of unexpected or creative solutions by contrasting dissimilar ideas. As it looks forward to make the resistance the least, it is popular with the voluntary organizations in which the decisions have an enhanced possibility of being executed when they are consented by a wide cross-section of people. Consensus methods are enviable when enforcement of the decision in impractical, such that it will be necessary on the part of every participant to act on the decision independently. (Consensus decision making: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

Improvement of Decision making process:-

While people speak of continuous improvement, they are in fact implying continuous change. To achieve a continuous change, there has to be certain factors, which makes people cohesive. A common purpose ought to be present, and each member must appreciate his responsibilities. When genuine, long-term change is desirable; in that case one ought to have a method of concentrating people on the change not as individuals, rather as a cohesive unit. Human capital is vital; however, the belief that people are the most vital asset is not true. The most vital asset of an organization is not its people, its technology, or even it's highly paid managers. Every component can be important, but each one in isolation is just an instrument. Even the most talented personnel will not be successful in case they operate in a system that is devised to be unsuccessful. Therefore the corporate system of drawing people together for mutual purposes is a critical factor to success.

In case some great integrating factor is able to draw normal, diligent people in a cohesive manner and aids them see their significance and their position inside the organization, those people will be able to make an immense contribution. On the contrary, a loose endeavor or approach to launching a change will likely to meet with failure. Also people working very hard will fail in case they have no focus. Perceptibly, it would be ideal to have exceptional people as well as exceptional system of introducing change, but an exceptional system of introducing change is what matters. (Creating a system for continuous improvement - improving an organization's decision-making process)

In an ideal situation, fulfilling evaluations must allow a facilitator to detect the strength and weakness of a group and choose appropriate interventions to assist the group to enhance it effectiveness. The various approaches to evaluation of group decision making has been criticized by John Rohrbaugh and Bradley Wright and recommend that evaluations must concentrate on processes instead of results, deal with the group rather than individual role and behaviors, and view the group in organizational perspective rather than in isolation. Building on the Competing Values Approach or CVA to organizational evaluation, they describe four perceptions on group decision processes. These are empirical, rational, political and consensual. (Evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of group decision-making processes: A Competition Values Approach)


Bradley E, Wright; Rohrbugh, John. 1999. Evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of group decision-making processes: A Competition Values Approach. Group Facilitation. Winter. Retrieved at on 28 may, 2005

Consensus Decision-Making. Retrieved at Accessed on 28 may, 2005

Consensus decision-making. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved at on 28 may, 2005

Huitt, W. 1992. Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual differences using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type. Vol: 24; pp: 33-44. Retrieved at Accessed on 27 may, 2005

Keith, Denton D. 1999. Creating a system for continuous improvement - improving an organization's decision-making process. Business Horizons. January-February. Retrieved at Accessed on 28 may, 2005

Lahti, Ryan K. Group Decision Making within the Organization: Can Models Help? CSWT Papers. Retrieved at Accessed on 27 may, 2005

Surviving the Group Project: A Note on Working in Teams. Retrieved at Accessed on 27 may, 2005

Teams Make Better Decisions Than Individuals. Retrieved at Accessed on 28 may, 2005[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Work And Organisation Improving The" (2005, May 29) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from

"Work And Organisation Improving The" 29 May 2005. Web.5 December. 2016. <>

"Work And Organisation Improving The", 29 May 2005, Accessed.5 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Improving Computer User Interface in Medical Care the

    Improving Computer-User Interface in Medical care The use of computer information systems in the field of medicine has revolutionized the way patients receive medical care. Computer information systems have assisted medical practitioners to capture and transfer information quickly saving the time taken to treat patients. Storage of information has also been automated such that the medical personnel do not have to manually input and store the data. The management of medical

  • Organizational Communications and Trust at the Foundation

    Organizational Communications and Trust At the foundation of any successful organization and its communication practices, systems and procedures is a very solid foundation of authenticity, transparency and trust. These three elements must pervade a corporate culture in order for it to attain a high level of performance and continued growth in turbulent times (Birasnav, Rangnekar, Dalpati, 2011). The highest performing companies have created a culture that celebrates and actively promotes organizational

  • Organizational Behavior the Group Behavior Model Is

    Organizational Behavior The Group Behavior Model is a framework for conceptualizing how various aspects of the external and internal environments of a work group influence the group's performance of its task(s) and the group members' level of satisfaction with the experience of group work. External conditions include an organization's authority structure, rules and regulations, corporate culture, resources, setting, and market competition. Internal factors include the individual skills, talents, and experiences each

  • Organizational Behavior the First Step

    For the most part, I would probably not want to work at Cisco. The convoluted structure devalues individual responsibility, which to my mind removes incentive for individual excellence. A manager's output is dependent on others, but there does not appear to be a mechanism to hold underperforming managers responsible. When the team is entirely comprised of internally motivated individuals, Cisco's system will work brilliantly. However, the system encourages managers to

  • Organizational Case Study Nutri Systems Company

    Organizational Case Study -- Nutri Systems Company Background - Nutrisystem is an American company that provides weightloss products and services. Originally, the company's sales and marketing model focused on Brick and Mortar stores, in-person counseling and exercise sessions, and the sale of prepackaged supplements and food products retail. In 1999, however, largely due to the number of diets on the market and exhaustive competiton, Nutrisystem began selling online with support through

  • Organizational Redesign Transferable Skills

    At the intersection between the executive and upper managerial levels, effective communication is equally important to implement executive decisions, as it is at the middle management and operational levels where most executive decisions with respect to strategic visions of organizational redesign must be executed to accomplish organizational goals (Maxwell, 2007). My Contribution to Organizational Redesign I have worked hard to improve my knowledge base and other aspects of technical skill in

  • Organizational Theory There Is a

    At the same time, this already discovered knowledge can be shared with the existing employees on a common forum and then implemented by each in part under the form of imitation. As we can see, with positive impacts, innovation and imitation can be successfully implemented internally, within the organization, and can help in maximizing the organization's activity. As we can see, organizational behavior helps, to some degree, shape the organization's

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved