¶ … liberty is seldom a win-win situation. Which ethical theory is the best in your opinion for selecting a "winner"? Utilitarianism? Deontology? Other? The philosophy of utilitarianism is problematic, given the difficulty of determining which group constitutes the 'majority' whose desires should rule over others. It is often said that if the First Amendment (free speech) and the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable searches) were 'put to a vote,' the American public would vote against them, because of its collective dislike of the ability of unpopular groups to articulate their ideas and its anger at seeing guilty people go free. Also, utilitarianism makes no allowance for the rights of minority groups at all, which can intensify the 'losses' of the minority group whose liberties are infringed upon to protect the rights of others.

Deontology's excessive rigidity can result in the curtailment of freedom -- how does...

The minority and the relative importance of different rights as they evolve over time in society is the best option for preserving a free society. This allows for more situational consideration of different variables. Sometimes, the will of the majority should be upheld because the costs to minority groups are not as great while in other instances the rights of minority groups should prevail.
Q2. How do you react to a scenario of marketing / promoting/encouraging people to buy health care? Some people believe advertising is infringing on consumers' freedoms because they paint an artificial picture that lures people into buying the insurance (forcing them to do what they do not want but coerced…