The court found in favor of the officer.
Hopkins v. Andaya is a similar case in which an officer was struck repeatedly and ignore despite several warnings. In both these cases, self-defense necessitated the use of firearms.
In the case of Tennessee v Garner, on the other hand, a suspect was fleeing. According to the law, a police officer could use deadly force if he or she believed that the suspect was dangerous to the public and guilty of the suspected crime. Such use of force, as Hall argues, is however no longer relevant in the legal climate of the United States. Due process and the presumption of innocence necessitates providing felons with the opportunity to state their case before a jury. Overly excessive force was therefore used in this case.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, there are many encouraging signs that the problem of police brutality is being addressed via the research. Legal and social circumstances have changed, necessitating a new paradigm of police work. For the future, the greatest challenge lies within research and development. Academic and policing institutions need to collaborate in finding ways to curb the excess of violence that departments appear prone to.
References
Charlton, Jacquie. (1997). A brief history of a "less than lethal" weapon. http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/1997/041797/sidebar.html
Halle, John C. (1997, Oct). Police Use of Nondeadly Force to Arrest. Law Enforcement Bulletin. http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/1997/oct975.htm
Mangan, David. (2008). Police Brutality the Use of Excessive Force. Drury University. http://www.drury.edu/ess/irconf/DMangan.html
Net Industries. (2009). Law Enforcement - Use of Force. http://social.jrank.org/pages/1332/Law-Enforcement-Use-Force.html
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now