¶ … leadership styles in evidence at Proctor & Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive. The paper will begin with an examination of the different leadership theories. Of particular interest will be surveys that can identify leadership types. When looking at leader-member exchanges, the key for this paper will be to ask both leaders and followers questions to determine what leadership styles are in use at these two companies. The survey technique will be utilized.
There are four different methods of data collection, including questionnaires (surveys), interviews, observations and unobtrusive measures. The questionnaire method for this project has the advantage of being easy to gather and tabulate, and in that way it is relatively inexpensive to gather large amounts of data. This will be important given that the project requires information from many different managers in these two companies. Interviews are more in-depth, which allows for the gathering of richer, more detailed data. Observations can also deliver rich data, and they allow the researcher to view with the same eye. This contrasts with interviews and surveys, where it is the participant that provides the information; in observation it is the researcher so interpretation is more consistent. Unobtrusive measures are detached, so there is no response bias, and is often easy to gather and quantify.
There are drawbacks to each of these techniques. The unobtrusive measures only work where the data is available, which is not always the case. For my project, this data is not available, so unobtrusive measures might not be available. Moreover, observations take a long time to gather, and the notes require a lot of work to process. Observations are the most time-consuming and expensive data to gather, though interviews are not far behind. By contrast, surveys can be relatively cheap because the respondents can be remote, and respond at their own leisure. Interviews and surveys are similar with these regards, but interviews require a lot more time to gather the information, since it requires the managers to submit to the interviews. Both surveys and interviews have a problem with self-reporting bias, something that does not occur with observations. The bias inherent...
446). Again, since data collection methods are relevant to specific research studies based on their questions, hypotheses, and literature reviews, this funneling of "phenomena of interest" should ideally suit most research studies -- so long as the those methods are tailored to meet a particular study. When researchers have narrowed down certain characteristics or behaviors that they are looking to observe in their study, they can do with a
This reduces response bias for better reliability of the information gathered and a higher anticipated response rate for an adequate sample size. A one month time frame gives better assurance of an appropriate response rate adequate analysis of results. Research Questions Patient wait time: How long did you wait before being register? < 5 min, 5 min, 10 min, longer How long did you wait to be called after being registered? <
S. Why or why not? Be specific in your response. Not necessarily. The NIBRS is not designed to provide national coverage (Hirschel, 2009; USDOJ, 2005). In practice, the NIBRS does provide a reliable method for estimating the incidence of those types of crimes that are defined similarly in the NIBRS and in other data collection methods and in reporting jurisdictions covered by the NIBRS. Conversely, the NIBRS is a less reliable
data collection for phenomenological research done? State the method then explain/Illustrate. Phenomenological research is grounded in the personal and subjective perspective. It falls into the larger category of qualitative research which is not theory-driven, but rather discovers the relationships among phenomena. (Patton, 2002). Phenomenological research can be considered inductive in nature as it moves from the specific to the general, unlike positivist experimental research which begins with general theories and
Observations Observations are possibly the oldest scientific tool around. Likely, too, it is the cheapest method, and, in a manner of speaking (depending on the length of time of the observation), the least time-consuming. Certainly, it is the easiest. Observations are also more direct than questionnaires or experimental method in that they do not require the subjects to respond to written (or verbal) questions, nor attempt to persuade them to do
data collection (people, researcher, institutional, event problems)? Unfortunately, there are a number of common problems that routinely occur when scientists or professionals are attempting to collect data for a specific study. These problems usually revolve around four integral elements for a study -- those that pertain to people or subjects involved within the study, the researchers themselves, institutional problems, as well as problems with specific events that take place during
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now