American Power Over The Past Research Proposal

In other words, once our leadership gains office, then whatever was said goes the way of special interest, because the interest of the greater society becomes lost in the quest of self-interest. We are perhaps for the first time in our nation's history attempting to understand our own path to the power we are perceived by the rest of the world as having. In fact, as Harvey so succinctly demonstrates in his discussion on the political maneuvering, because America could not have by any stretch of the imagination have accomplished its present act upon the world stage without a supporting cast of world players (28). When they built America up for purposes of pursuing their own self-interest, then their support of America quickly began deteriorating, disintegrating to a lack of control of their own political forces, economies, and even inability to mobilize their human resources as they would have previously had the power to do.

The motivations and interests of agents will differ (27)," Harvey suggests in what is a very familiar way. Harvey has intelligently and convincingly made his study of America's path to power, and found that the path was neither the short road, nor a lonely one, but one that was thwart with the pot holes along the path as we are now discovering in our shared world economic crisis. The geography that Harvey talks about that causes the capital accumulation more...

...

Suddenly the reader realizes that Americans were not really the powerful force that they had perceived themselves to be, but the front man in a greater play of combined agendas. Only for a moment did America's agenda stand independent of the other players, who became panicked when George Bush, less savvy than his American electorate, exposed himself and America as the front man in what is quickly turning out to be a very bad manipulation of a nation.
Harvey asks an interesting question: "Does the U.S. have the power to reverse or control such regional fragmentation (31)." This is the question that remains unanswered as Americans scramble to regain their footing. Whether or not the newly elected Barack Obama will manifest the hope and strength that underlies the crisis in America now is yet to be determined.

Works Cited

Harvey, David. The New Imperialism, Oxford University Press,…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Harvey, David. The New Imperialism, Oxford University Press, 2005.


Cite this Document:

"American Power Over The Past" (2009, February 26) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/american-power-over-the-past-24473

"American Power Over The Past" 26 February 2009. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/american-power-over-the-past-24473>

"American Power Over The Past", 26 February 2009, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/american-power-over-the-past-24473

Related Documents

American Empire Is There Room at the Top? The question as to whether the United States is currently and will remain a superpower is the topic of much scholarly debate and in the general population around the dinner table. The follow up question to that, of course is, is there room at the top for another superpower, and if so which country or countries will rise to the occasion? Is America really

Paradox of American Power
PAGES 5 WORDS 1549

Paradox of American power is an interesting account of America's rise to the status of super power where Joseph Nye explains why America's lone ranger approach can no longer work in today's world. The author has extremely impressive credentials, which lends more credibility to his research and his work as a political analyst is greatly appreciated. Joseph Nye Jr. is "currently the dean at Harvard University's Kennedy School of

The United States of America's foreign policy has mirrored its influence and power within the international community. As a small and weak nation, America was forced to employ a regional foreign policy, limited to the North American continent. But as the U.S. grew into a powerful industrialized nation, its foreign policy began to change to include more international issues. Finally, as a result of the need for the United States

" This view appears to be excessively negative, not least because of its lack of balance. It fails to acknowledge balance and uses all arguments to the contrary to perpetuate itself. Neither the view of American exceptionalism being wholly good or wholly bad is therefore entirely realistic. Much more realistic is perhaps Koh's view, although it still tends towards the somewhat negative side. I do agree with this author in terms

American Politics
PAGES 6 WORDS 1857

American Politics Introduction to Kevin Phillips Kevin Phillips is a well-known, controversial yet respected writer and political analyst, who writes about the political and social world of contemporary America with a sense of literary style and an "at the bottom of it" substance. His most recent book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, would seem to give the literary and politically uninitiated all the

American Expansion Post-Reconstruction America gave rise to an incredibly transformative society and culture. Modernism was beginning to sweep the land with the industrial revolution, urbanization and westward expansion. How did the underprivileged fare in this new America? What were the experiences and problems of the Native Americans, women, African-Americans, and various immigrant groups at this time? Be specific. Was there a gap between the rhetoric of hope and democracy peddled by