Criticism of ancient astronaut theory
Critics of the ancient astronaut thesis used some of the following arguments to demolish the claims:
1. Religious
The claims of extra-terrestrials are totally unfounded and many are complete reinterpretations of (for instance) the Bible. proponents such as Von Daniken and Barry Downing, for example, believe that the concept of hell in the Bible was a description of Venus transmitted by extraterrestrials who showed photos of the hot surface on Venus to humans (Penczak, 2007). These, and many more claims, cannot even be called pseudo-science. They are fictitious and stuff of science-fiction.
2. Cultural
These arguments too have been proven to be unfounded with most being discredited and the others simply lacking basis. professor Joe Nickell of the University of Kentucky,, for instance, showed that the Nazca lines could easily have been created by nay human on ground from stake and string, whilst archeologists have concluded the artifacts in Egypt (the Saqqara Bird) and Colombia-Ecuador to be stylized renditions of insects and birds
3. Technology
Archeologists have simulated the building of the pyramids (and other sites) and showed that megaliths up to at least 40 tons could be moved by humans unaided. With a larger workforce, ancient technology could certainly have moved megaliths larger than this (History Channel "Mega Movers: Ancient Mystery Moves").
The assertion of the supporters of ancient astronauts are not unique. The Greeks in the Darkly Ages too believed that the mythical giant Cyclopes built the Mycenaean cities
My Opinion and Conclusion
Adherents of the Ancient Astronaut thesis believe that intelligent extraterrestrial...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now