', the prime Apollo 1 command and service modules contractor. A task force review was conducted and headed up by Samuel C. Phillips, Apollo Program Director. Phillips conducted an extensive investigation of the management of the contractor on programs and recommended remedial action for North American Aviation, Inc.
J. Budget Impacts at NASA
It is reported that NASA did not feel effects from the accident budget-wise of the 1967 fiscal year however the Apollo 204 accident "therefore, will appear in future years as is evidenced bit the increase in the total runout cost estimate for the Apollo program." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection) Findings of the Apollo Review Board of the Apollo accident reported having "…determined that the test conditions at the time of the accident were 'extremely hazardous by either NASA of the contractor prior to the accident." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection)
The consequence was the failure to established safety precautions that were efficient in handling this type of incident and procedures were never established or group support focused on assisting the crew. There was a failure as well to locate medical emergency equipment or fire-fighting equipment on the scene in the 'white room' which surrounded the Apollo command module nor were emergency fire and medical rescue teams in attendance." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection) the Review Board of the Apollo 204 stated that there "appears to be no adequate explanation for the failure to recognize the test being conducted at the time of the accident as hazardous." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection)
K. NASA Firmly Claims Mitigation of all Hazards in the Apollo 204 Project
NASA is stated to have maintained through the entire investigation that they believed that all ignition sources had been effectively eliminated and NASA also held firm that the combustible materials and oxygen were effectively sealed off from one another. The truth is however, that "all ignition sources had not been eliminated." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection)
Differences in Apollo Spacecraft Design
Bug-like cab on legs
10 ft, 7in.
22 ft, 7in. excluding fairing
12 ft, 10in.
12 ft, 10in.
31 ft (diagonal of landing gear)
210 cu ft
160 cu ft (approx)
12,800 lb (approx)
54,200 lb (approx)
36,200 lb (approx)
Source: Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection
III. Outcomes and Recommendations
The Apollo Review Board Research Committee stated recommendations that NASA "continue to move the Apollo program forward to achieve its goal." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection) the testimony of NASA reports that the possibility to put man on the moon by 1969 was doable. It is reported that safety "must be considered of paramount importance in the manned space flight program even at the expense of target dates." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection) the committee additionally stated that the "earnest declaration that safety is our prime consideration must be transfused into watchfulness so that people do not again stumble into the pitfall of complacency." (Report of Apollo 204 Review Board-- NASA Historical Reference Collection) in the National Aeronautics and Space administration's fiscal year 1968 the Congress authorized its act, which authorized the appointment of an Aerospace Safety advisory Panel by the Administrator for conducted review of the operational plans of NAA and to advise the Administrator in, regards to the proposed or existing facilities in terms of their hazards.
Hill, William C. (2000) Final Report: Inspection of Apollo 1/204 Hardware. September 2000. Retrieved from: http://www.xmission.com/~jwindley/bibhill.html
Report of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences United States Senate with Additional View. 30 Jan 1968 Apollo 204 Accident. 90th Congress 2d Session. Report No. 956. Retrieved from: http://klabs.org/richcontent/Reports/Failure_Reports/as-204/senate_956/index.htm
Hill, William C. (2000) Final Report: Inspection…
Apollo Program on Technology Some people do not understand the space program. They consider it an indulgence with little to add to the practical world. What they fail to consider is that the space program has facilitated much of the science that is responsible for today's technological advances. In fact, putting aside anything that the space program has contributed to the knowledge of the universe as a greater system, it
Apollo 13 analysis and diagnosis using the 1995 film "Apollo 13" starring tom hanks Apollo 13 analysis and diagnosis Executive summery The exploration of the space brought a lot of excitement. The super power countries, each has sought to establish its dominance and security by exploring the space. NASA is the United States agency for exploring the space. This report has evaluated the Apollo 13 incident in view of the film that was
Apollo Moon Landing It is interesting that when a researcher types in "Apollo Moon Landing" on Google, the second link that comes up is "Moon landing conspiracy theories"; and entering the site the shocking revelation is that up to 20% of Americans surveyed believed that the moon landings were faked. The Fox News TV network even ran a documentary with a conspiracy theory as its editorial backbone ("Did We Land on
Apollo Group is the leading name in for-profit education and adult education, with its stable of subsidiaries including Apollo Global, the College for Financial Planning, the Institute for Professional Development and, most notably, Phoenix University. The account hereafter offers an overview of the Apollo Group's general orientation, business strategy, structural components and a number of other defining organizational dimensions. Vision and Mission: Originally stated as a Vision and ultimately evolving into the
Apollo Shoes Casebook Apollo Shoes Inc. is a company specializing in the global distribution of high quality tech shoes. Apollo has demonstrated leadership position in electronic shoes, and high tech shoes such as athletic shoes with amplified loudspeakers, and sneakers with a cellular phone. The company brands include SPEAKERSHOE, SPOTLIGHT, and SIREN. While Apollo has enjoyed rapid growth, however, there is a dramatic growth of unaudited Apollo income in the past
Apollo Economics Apollo Hospitals is a healthcare provider in India. The healthcare system in India is oriented towards private enterprise, as government provides very little care, something that is matched with atrocious health outcomes. Most health spending is on an out-of-pocket basis, with only 15% of the people using health insurance to cover their costs. Within this milieu, Apollo Group emerged to win a substantial share of the private hospital market.