¶ … Army Problem Solving Model Process and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process Comparison
When comparing the Army Problem Solving Model Process and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process, there are fundamental characteristics that hold true for both processes. When each is investigated more deeply, the contrasts become evident. The surface comparisons can be seen as follows:
Both decision processes are used by the military to arrive at a viable solution as called for by certain situations.
Both processes are well established and often used by the Army.
Both decision capabilities are developed by Army personnel by means of practice and training.
Both capabilities are utilized according to the demands of specific situations.
Both capabilities involve a number of steps to arrive at the decision made according to the nature and demand of the situation at the time.
Steps of Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process
The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process concerns five basic steps, the first two of which can be performed in any order, while the other three are performed interactively until an acceptable coarse of action is developed in terms of the third step. The first step is to 1) compare the current situation to the order.
This step involves commanders who identify the likely variances during the planning stage. Options are then identified in order to match each potential variance. These options will then be carried out when the variances occur. During the performance of the process, the current situation is compared to the variances envisioned and an appropriate option can then be matched to it. The second step, that could occur concurrently with the above-mentioned processes, is 2) determine the type of decision required.
During this step, the identified variance is followed by directing action. This task is handled by the commander, while the chief of operations works with the other chiefs to quickly compare the current situation with the expected situation. This is doen in terms of opportunities or threats. If it is estimated that freedom of action, CCIRs, and limiting factors such as supplies, boundaries, and combat strength. After this step, the next action is to 4) refine and validate the course of action.
The given course of action is analyzed according to a number of criteria that include its feasibility, suitability, and acceptability. The course of action is then refined to meet the required needs in terms of the mission and combat power. This step occurs very quickly, since it is often done under the pressure of time constraints. The final step then occurs, which is to 5) implement.
Implementation is recommended by the XO to the commander, or occurs directly according to the delegation of duties. These final three steps are integrated until mission stability is achieved, or until no further courses of action are required. Synchronization, responsiveness, and timeliness are integrally important in the final implementation step.
Contrasts: Army Problem Solving and Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization.
The most obvious contrasting point between the two models is the number of steps taken to arrive at the final implementation, with the Army Problem Solving consisting of seven steps and the Rapid model involving only five steps.
A second contrast is the fact that the Rapid method often involves the integration and repetition of steps, while the sequence in Army Problem Solving tends to occur in sequence.
Third, the Army Problem Solving process takes time to search for the optimal solution. It does so by comparing a variety of possible solutions. The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process searches for solutions that can be implemented as rapidly as possible. It therefore avoids time-intensive requirements such as…
Army Problem Solving Models Compare and contrast the Army Problem solving model process with the rapid decision making and synchronication process (C100) The Army's problem solving model process is defined by both the Field Manual 22-100 Army Leadership and the Field Manual 101-5 Staff Organization and Operations (Chapter 5) as a detailed, seven-step process which is used by Army personnel to address battlefield dilemmas in the most effective and efficient manner possible.
Make and implement the decision- after the analysis and subsequent comparison has been made, the leaders will together pick the most preferred solution to the problem and hence proceed to implementation of the solution. This will be followed by the monitoring of the solution implemented so as to rebuff any problems that may arise on the process of the implementation. Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDSP) Rapid decision making is an
Army Diversity The United States Army and Diversity The United States Army has fought very hard to overcome its segregated past and become a premiere model of inclusiveness and diversity. Today, the Army is a capable, high performing, results-oriented unit -- and as richly diverse as America itself. Collaboration and the sharing of diverse viewpoints, skills, backgrounds, languages and ideas have helped improve effectiveness and quality throughout the entire organization. The Army
iii) Appraisals Appraisals are precision indicators that enable managers to rat their organizational and managerial performance. The appraisal of the U.S. army is not only regarded in America, but also globally. The respect shown to them is due to the worth of sacrifice and zeal in achieving their objective of protecting America. These appraisals enhance the assessment of its performance and enhance the career development of the soldiers. The HR Model
Child Sex Trafficking: Sex trafficking is basically defined as the enlisting, harboring, provision, moving, or acquisition of an individual for the main goal of a commercial sex act. In this case, an individual who has not attained 18 years old is forced or coerced to perform sexual acts. Generally, a person is forced or coerced for the purpose of debt bondage, involuntary servitude, or slavery. In the past few years, child
Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of