¶ … Federal Budget surplus by focusing on the three consecutive years of surplus budgets achieved by the Clinton Administration after nearly fifty years during the last three years towards the end of the second term of President Clinton and his administration from 1998 to 2000.
President made public the new White House budget figures that expect a surplus of $39 billion for the fiscal year 1998 and a $150 billion surplus over a period of five years. Clinton felt that the time had come to shut the deficit cluck and start the surplus clock. He also believed that the American economy currently was the envy of the world, yet this was not preordained nor was it guaranteed for the future. So, he wished to continue his strategy of strict fiscal discipline and investments into the future that has made this surplus budget possible He believed very strongly that the surplus should go into the Social Security to save it and any other initiatives like tax cuts can be considered only after that. The OMB mid-session is more conservative than the Congressional Budget Office, which had projected the surplus to be somewhere between $43 billion and $63 billion, but in projections over the next five years the CBO had come up with the conservative estimate of $73 billion dollars. As a part of the presenting of the report of the OMB Office by the Director Jack Lew, he added that there was now a surplus to save. The President was of the opinion that in this election year lawmakers should not give in to the temptation to make merry with the surplus, but rather use it wisely in strengthening it for the 21st century. (Clinton Announces $39 Billion Projected Budget Surplus)
Initially most lawmakers supported the use plans to utilize the surplus to save Social Security, however in the recent times many Republican leaders have changed their stance in that they would prefer the surplus be used for tax cuts. President Clinton does not negate that possibility in total, but wants to make solvency of Social Security the first priority. The President gave credit to his administration for this rosy economic forecast, as when he assumed office the deficit for this year was projected to be $350 billion. This largest projected deficit in history was turned around to the biggest projected surplus by his administration in the old fashioned way of earning it. President Clinton gave credit to the Congress too in that this surplus became possible because of two visionary actions of the Congress. The first was the courageous vote of the Democrats in 1993, despite stiff criticism, that caused a cut in the deficit by ninety percent. This was followed up by the bipartisan balanced budget agreement that received the assent of the Congress that completed the job. (Clinton Announces $39 Billion Projected Budget Surplus)
On February 2, 1998 during a White House occasion President announced a budget plan whereby he expected the first budget surplus in about thirty years. Unless there was a major downturn in the economy the Clinton Administration expected the budget surplus to be about $9.5 billion. For the fiscal year 1999 and reach about $1 trillion in a span of ten years. This expected windfall has created a surplus fever amongst the economists and politicians in Washington. The talk has shifted from means to reduce the deficit to the ways to spend this surplus. President Clinton in his State of the Union address has sought that Congress keep aside this surplus till the Social Security system has been bolstered for the coming century. With the expected retirement of the baby boomers in a short while the President would prefer actions that at this time that ensured the security of the finances in the system that provided support to the Americans that were retiring. (Surplus Fever: The debate surrounding the anticipated budget surplus)
This has received support from both...
Cuts in defensive spending, minor reductions to social security and the aforementioned tax measures will significantly improve the economy, whereas some of the options the U.S. has pursued in recent times are doing the opposite, as the following quotation implies. Washington is likely to make across-the-board cuts in discretionary spending, where there is much less money and considerably less waste…but reducing funds for things like education, scientific research, air-traffic control,
With a declining economic output, we can not financially export our way out of a government budget deficit situation. Since the oil crunch of the mid-1970s, energy costs have increasingly been a part of this equation. Trade deficits are linked to budget deficits in this way. This is best presented in a May 12, 2010 article, Donna Kardos Yesalovich documented that U.S. stock futures pared earlier gains after data
Al., 2010). Nursing and the ER The Emergency Room is often one of the most visible parts of healthcare for political debate. It is also one of the most difficult environments for a modern nurse. It is interesting that one of the founders of modern nursing had emergency experience prior to developing her overall theories. Nightingale also looked at negatives and positives that are the conditions, which could help make people recover
4 trillion and $3.6 trillion, an impressive boost to the U.S. economy in those years, the IPC explains. A study conducted by Arizona State University determined that when a person has a bachelor's degree that person earns about $750,000 more over the course of a lifetime of earning than a person with just a high school diploma earns. The data from that study indicates that as of 2006, those working without
Conservative American Presidents The purpose of this paper is to introduce and discuss the return to conservatism in the American presidency after the 1980s. It will compare the similarities to earlier periods in the 19th and 20th century, and discuss what relationship there is between this return to conservatism, and the continued struggle for U.S. military dominance and economic globalization. THE RETURN TO CONSERVATISM IN AMERICAN POLITICS The country emerged from World War
US Aid to Afghanistan The issue of United States' aid to Afghanistan is a topic of interesting consideration given the current U.S. budget deficit and ongoing economic uncertainty. Over the years the United States has spent billions providing money and food aid to help build strength and confidence in Afghanistan's rising new government. Unfortunately, the results of this have not been entirely positive nor have they been driven by the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now