¶ … Judith Stacy is a professor as well as author of cultural and social analysis. She focused mainly on studies of gender, queer relationships, and sexuality. She explores the typical pattern of relationships that deviate the basic western marriages idea in her article.
In 1968 Stacey got her bachelor degree from university of Michigan. In 1968 she received degree of Maters in history from university of Illinois and from Brandeis she received her PhD in sociology degree in 1969. She stayed in the faculty of university of California in 1979-1997 and then she appointed as Streisand professor of gender studies and PRF of sociology in southern California.
Judith Stacy, an expert on the family is very well-known for her challenging research on conventional issues. She seems to be very impatient with the increasing war situation of same sex marriages, divorce, fatherlessness, marital fidelity and the like. She unveils many profiles around the world which are based on unfamiliar culture of contemporary love, marriages and the family values.
Her research is based on original stories that cover the topic from relationship of gay men's and parenting in country to plural and non-marital form of family in South Africa and China. This book decouples the taken for granted relationship between love, marriage and parenthood. Comparing a typical family she gives us a chance to have a deep look at these unfamiliar varieties of relationship and family and their social conditions which butter or better them.
The book explains common beliefs about family through stories of real families leading to unavoidable personal exchange of desires and domesticity. It gives a powerful practical challenge to thinking that nuclear family of singles or gays is the only way to fulfill our requirement of relationship. Stacey advises the policy makers that if they want peace then they should accept that these varieties of family making are here to stay.
Stacy explained that love is related with marriage and children and then she concluded that marriage is not a worldwide universal. With the example of unique cultures she gives evidence that strong relationships between families can be made without marriages or only by knowing the child by its biological parents. She explains that typical chine's culture does not have a necessity of issues like divorce, family dissertation or fatherless children as these notations do not exit.
Stacy also said that by giving a legal right to same sex marriages will not bring any new change in parenthood and it also might not make any new benefit for couples. This she said that this right would not lead to equality.
In a Los angles study of couples, she studied different same sex couples and found they are using different methods in managing the children. She came to know some situations where a male couple and a female couple are sharing their children she refer this as "polyparenting arrangements." Stacy argues on this situation that in this case biological parents would give the more legal rights than non-biological parents.
Stacy said that now it's time to change our cultural value with basic point-of-view that if you love a person than you should marry that person in order to get…
Rather than lamenting the loss of a family structure from an admittedly anomalous decade, Stacy (1993) argues that social reforms are necessary to ensure that children are cared for. In Beck-Gernsheim's (2002:85) assessment, the focus should not be on "the black-and-white alternative 'end of the family' or 'family as the future'" but on "the many grey areas or better, the many different shades in the niches inside and outside the
Changing Family Part I The salient features of the social problem of the changing family are these: the traditional family unit has changed drastically over the past century in the U.S. At the turn of the 20th century, two parent households were still very much the norm and the dynamic was such that the father went to work to earn the living for the family and the mother managed the domestic sphere,
Family Values in Urban America: Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective Background of family values in the American society Judeo-Christian perspective on family values Secular perspective on family values Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective The topic of this paper is family values in urban America and it is from the analysis of the family values that the study intends to draw out a difference between the Judeo-Christian perspective and the secular perspective
Family Break Up For a humane, the word 'community' hints at people trying to work out solutions to common problems. The term 'community' generally stands for a group that is bigger and more diverse than a family or any group of people bound together with relationships. It also has more elements than being of the same neighborhood or enclave, though not as large as a county or a nation. Certainly it
43). In The Odyssey, Jocasta demonstrates loyalty to her family by urging Odysseus to give up his pursuit for the truth. She literally begs him to stop quarrelling with Creon but he refuses to listen to her. He becomes obsessed to Jocasta's demise. When he tells his wife, "I will not listen; the truth must be made known" (Sophocles Oedipus 825), she knows that she has lost her husband. The
It also varies with urban or rural residence. Urban households commonly earn more and enjoy a higher standard of living than rural households. The allocation for food spending corresponds to the biggest part of the family budget. However, as family income increases, the share in food in consumption expenses generally drops. This is most likely because of the popularity of "fast foods" nowadays. Socialization Process The process of socialization takes a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now