Changing Threats/Historical Eras
Discussion response: Changing threats
The American public's perception of threats has clearly shifted since the tragic events of 9/11 from an emphasis on state-based actors in the wake of the Cold War era to non-state-based actors in the era of terrorism. Rather than threats to American security projected as something which occurs 'over there' in foreign lands, or the threat of destruction through nuclear war, the fear of home-grown attacks has grown and been further exacerbated by additional highly-publicized, more recent terror incidents, such as the Boston Marathon bombings. States such as New York that are deemed high-priority threats are working harder to coordinate anti-terror efforts with federal agencies and are seeking to consistently engage in coordinated anti-terror exercises and planning activities, to ensure a more seamless response in the face of a likely future onslaught. "The 9/11 Commission Report highlighted the need for improved operational...
New York State has successfully implemented the NIMS (through training, planning, and exercises) to ensure that all first responders in the State are operating using a common 'playbook' with regards to incident response" (Ten years after 9/11, 2011, NY State Government).
However, although the American public may be more watchful, vigilant, and fearful, it has also at times expressed frustration with the additional requirements placed upon mobility, such as the onerous restrictions on airplane travelers. Limiting liquids, removing shoes, and increased levels of physical surveillance have all brought complaints from passengers, even though these precautions arose from specific incidents and were designed to protect rather than inconvenience the public (How airport security has changed since 9/11, 2013, Flight Global). Although in the wake of heightened threats or actual events, public perceptions of security and the police may become more favorable,…
