Mental health is an essential part of overall health. The Surgeon General's report on mental health in 1999 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999) and the 2001 supplement Mental Health: Culture, Race and Ethnicity (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001) both highlighted mental health as a critical health aspect affecting a broad range of individuals today. Current paper is focused at exploring the concept of clinical psychology and how it is different from social psychology, counseling psychology and forensic psychology.
Clinical Psychology is the field of psychology in which theory, science and clinical knowledge are combined for the objective of comprehension, prevention and relieve distress and dysfunction based on psychology and for the promotion prejudiced comfort and personal development. The main features of clinical psychology are psychological assessment and psychotherapy. Though clinical psychologist participate in psychological research, teaching, counseling and forensic assessment. Clinical Psychology is a legalized profession in several countries (Plante, 2005)
Difference between Social Psychology, Counseling and Forensic Psychology
Social psychology is the field of psychology in which different aspects of social life and social behavior are dealt. It is well established that every individual has feelings, perceptions, opinions and beliefs about almost everything comes in the daily life. In addition to this everyone has their own argument about these feelings and emotions as why they possess a particular opinion or feeling about any thing.
Counselling psychology is another field of psychology which deals with counselling on personal and emotional behaviours and attitudes of people. Through counselling many psychological problems are dealt. The difference...
Forensic psychology has been considered as a branch of psychology and speciality by the America Psychological Association (APA) since the year of 2001 (Kane, 2008). There are experts in this field who are trained in three areas: clinical, forensic, and legal. At clinical level they get training and education in the psychological assessment, intervention, analysis, and ethics. At forensic level, they are trained about the examinee's response style in addition to other methods for assessing the symptoms and aptitudes associated with legal questions. As the forensic psychology deals with legal and judicial system so the forensic psychologists are education and trained about legal and court system and they are taught general information about the judicial system, case law, statutes, administrative codes, and the methods of getting appropriate legal information. Mostly forensic psychologists are education and trained in clinical or counselling psychology and get post doctorate forensic training (Goldstein, 2007; Melton et al., 2007). There have been introduced graduate programs offering doctorates in forensic psychology or joint jurist doctorate/doctorates in clinical psychology programs that allow psychologists the chance to get training in particular in the field of forensic psychology.
The difference and clinical and forensic psychology is basically the evaluations that are performed: these differences are 1) in the clinical evaluation the investigative, behavioural, and psychological standards are considered 2) in clinical psychology, the diagnosis of a mental mess is performed and a treatment strategy or intervention is given to patient. Though in clinical and forensic assessments same issues are addressed but in forensic psychology legal aspects are also addressed and it is ensured that these assessments meet evidence standards. As compared to clinical assessment the forensic evaluation is aimed at assisting an attorney or trier of fact in a specified lawful issue. Therefore, it is possible that assessments might centre on a particular occasion or on a nonclinical communication connecting the examinee and a third party (Heilbrun, 2001; Melton et al., 2007).
The role of a clinical and…
Mental Health Policies and Legislation It is not humane nor is it dignified to allow any living person to live in a florid psychosis; this would be a cruel and odd punishment. In the Australian medical practice, the health laws and regulations dictate that, doing the legal thing in the course of duty is not sufficient, but rather the professional must do what is morally right. In definition, recovery is the
However, integrated continuum of care networks presents a viable solution to mental health care delivery that properly allocates resources a collaborative and cooperative service delivery system. Needed, according to Mohatt (1997) is "vertical integration' in the "approaches to managed care" in networking a group of healthcare providers, at various levels of primary care and behavioral health, to form an integrated service network. They seek to develop, via cooperation, a coordinated,
Clinical Psychology Dissertation - Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings An Abstract of a Dissertation Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings This study sets out to determine how dreams can be used in a therapeutic environment to discuss feelings from a dream, and how the therapist should engage the patient to discuss them to reveal the relevance of those feelings, in their present,
However, more empirical studies have been published in recent years which have both reported outcomes but also have acknowledged the complexity of the interaction of the number of variables involved in predicting outcome effects on children whose parents are substance abusers (Dworkin & Hirsch, 2004). This literature is particularly important because of the large number of children affected by substance abuse of various kinds and the social policy directed
mental health prisoners usa. I've included outline main idea, I apply ideas questions. contact clarifications. I. Introduce define global health issue connection nursing. For, . Mental Health in the American Prison System There has always been much controversy regarding prisoners and their mental health, but as civilization has experienced much progress throughout this century people have become more and more concerned about making sure that prisons are able to differentiate between
Nonetheless, people who received some level of ACRP intervention had a lower rate of criminal recidivism than people who received no intervention at all. System Flow The study found that the case flow through the ACRP was a little slow. The amount of time between the Initial Opt-In Hearing and the Formal Opt-In Hearing averaged 74 days. While there are no hard and fast rules governing how long this process should take,