Clinton Health Reform Research Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
660
Cite

Clinton Health Reform The success of the Obama health care reform has been studied extensively, but there remains one topic worth discussing further, which is why Obama succeeded when the Clinton health care reform plan failed. This paper will analyze this issue and come to some conclusions about this important question.

In 1993, President Clinton announced his health care security plan. A large health policy team had put the plan together, and it represented substantial compromise and hard work. At the time of the announcement it seemed a near certainty that this plan would be made into law, but this would not come to pass (Starr, 1995). The plan initially received a two-thirds positive rating in polling of the American public, but it still managed to fail.

The proposal centered around an individual mandate, which at the time had been supported broadly by many Republicans and almost every interest group involved in the negotiations (Starr, 1995). Major interest groups that had been traditionally opposed to health care reform had lent their support, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which even approved the employer mandate.

Starr (1995) argues...

...

These groups were disbanded in May of 1993, and this left the health reform treading water without any real direction and no administrative momentum, Clinton himself distracted by an ongoing budget crisis. The lag between the proposal and getting this bill to law was sufficient to allow groups opposed to the reform to organize and begin to mount an opposition. Their efforts were further buoyed by a decline in Clinton's personal credibility.
Part of the problem lay with early supporters of the reform. Republicans who supported the reform backed away from it, but so did key interest groups, having seen that there was opposition beginning to mount and seeking distance from what was beginning to look like a troubled President.

These are not traits of the Obama reform. First, the Obama reform never had the support of many of these interest groups, nor any Republicans. Groups that for Clinton had engaged in compromise and negotiation only to lose their resolve were never interested in negotiation, compromise or any sort of idea generation of their own. Obama simply worked around them, working with his Congressional majority and personal credibility. Where Clinton faced attacks…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Skocpol, T (1996). Boomerang: Health care reform and the turn against government. W.W. Norton.

Starr, P. (1995). What happened to health care reform? The American Prospect. Vo. 20 (1995) 20-31.


Cite this Document:

"Clinton Health Reform" (2013, November 18) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/clinton-health-reform-127543

"Clinton Health Reform" 18 November 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/clinton-health-reform-127543>

"Clinton Health Reform", 18 November 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/clinton-health-reform-127543

Related Documents

Oddly, as a number of more objective critics have pointed out, Clinton's bill was "a compromise between market-oriented and government-centered reform ideas," (Carter 116). Although Clinton was concerned with creating a national healthcare system, he was also concerned with eliminating the federal budget crisis that he had inherited. The result was that Clinton offered a stepwise approach towards a socialistic healthcare system with an initial period, at least, of allowing

Obama Clinton Reform Obama and Clinton Health Care Reform The current state of healthcare in the United States represents a situation that is unique by international standards. When considering the average costs per citizen against the health outcomes that can be expected, the United States represents the most inefficient medical system in the world. The U.S. spends more than any other country per capita while providing its population with health outcomes that

Healthcare Reform "Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital" The case of Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital was a case that attempted to end the segregation of African-American and Whites in the U.S. hospitals and medical professions as a whole. The case challenged the use of public funds to maintain and expand the segregated hospital care in the United States. Source of the laws related to the case are: Title VII

Originally, this included 120 days of hospital benefits and 120 days of nursing-home benefits. General revenue funds from the program would also be applied towards hospital construction equipment purchase and grants to teaching hospitals. The second part of the law, also known as Part B, concerned physician visits. Initially, Part B was known as Eldercare, the American Medial Association's (AMA) alternative to Medicare. Mills however reformed it to become an

There are a number of issues involved in health care including taxation, the fear of socialized medicine and the budget. Many Americans are opposed to higher taxes for the wealthy due to the fact that they will be the ones paying for most government spending including the proposed heath care bill. These people also argue that it's the wealthy that create jobs through investing and if their taxes are

Health Care Reform
PAGES 2 WORDS 600

Healthcare Debate The United States Healthcare Debate Healthcare is necessary for humanity's survival in the best conditions possible. Various countries across the world have different system, with most consisting of an institutionalized or socialist system. However, the United States stands almost unique in its privatized, corporate-oriented and often patient-neglecting healthcare system. Various leaders in our country's history have strived to change this, yet none have been as successful as President Obama, though