But evidence indicates the true motive for the increased arms sales since the dismantling of the former Soviet Union is not about peacekeeping at all but about the bottom dollar.
According to the annual assessment, the United States supplied $8.1 billion worth of weapons to developing countries in 2005 -- 45.8% of the total and far more than second-ranked Russia with 15% and Britain with a little more than 13% (Bender, 2006)."
Arms sales (agreements) ranked by Supplier, 1998-2005 (in constant 2005 million U.S. Dollars and percentage of world sales).
Percentage of total sales
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, http://www.globalissues.org/i/pdf.gif
Report for Congress, U.S. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, October 23, 2006. (Dollar values are constant 2005 dollars)
Each country shown as follows:
developing countries industrialized countries
If you are viewing this table on another site, please see http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/BigBusiness.aspfor further details and context.
United http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 97,144
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 41,600
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 30,000
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 17,000
United http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 14,900
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 9,100
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 5,600
Other http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 33,800
http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar-blue.png http://www.globalissues.org/i/bar.png out of 17,300
The Executive Director of the Nonpartisan Arms Control Association, Daryl Kimball has been quoted as saying the U.S. And other nations are no longer selling arms for the self-defense of the nations buying them, but instead the arms are being sold for selfish reasons which will haunt the nations that sold them someday (Bender, 2006).
Another seldom discussed reason that the arms sales have seen such a dramatic increase since the collapse of the Soviet Union has been the ability to control the nations doing the buying (Washburn, 1999).
One example is Turkey. The U.S. is the main arms supplier to Turkey, therefore if it doesn't agree with something Turkey is doing it can threaten...
always had the upper hand with developing nations by pointing to the Soviet Union and hinting if the U.S. did not protect the developing nation the Soviet Union might take it over. The developing nation would do whatever the U.S. wanted to prevent that from happening and to keep the U.S. As a protective ally. Once the Soviet Union was dismantled it was no longer a viable threat, even to the underdeveloped nations of the world and many of the stronger nations lost that control.
Selling arms to the developing nations provides the stronger countries with that power again because they can threaten to stop the sales or to sell to the enemy if the country does not do as it is told.
Given its role as Turkey's principal arms supplier, the United States has enormous potential leverage over Turkish behavior on critical issues such as respect for human rights and the pursuit of negotiated settlements to the 15-year civil war with the PKK and the 25-year-old division of Cyprus (Washburn, 1999)."
The arms sales between nations started out to help underdeveloped nation protect themselves from "bully nations" including the former Soviet Union. Once the threat was gone however, nations continued to sell arms to the developing nations to turn a profit and to find a new method of control. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union there has been a dramatic increase in arms sales around the world. It is time to stop the cycle before the U.S. And other nations become the bully nations through the power of selling arms.
Bender, Brian (2006) U.S. is top purveyor on weapons sales (Accessed 3-22-07) list http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2006/11/13/us_is_top_purveyor_on_weapons_sales_list/?page=2Shipments grow to unstable areas by Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
Lewis, James (2005) Arms Control Today. LOOKING BACK: Multilateral Arms Transfer Restraint: The Limits of Cooperation
Roberts, Tom (1999) New battles brew over defense spending, arms sales.
National Catholic Reporter
Russia revisits Cold War policy (Accessed 3-24-07) http://badgerherald.com/oped/2007/02/20/russia_revisits_cold.php
Washburn, Jennifer (1999) Arming Repression:
U.S. Arms Sales to Turkey During the Clinton Administration
Joint Report of the World Policy Institute and the Federation of American Scientists
Whitelaw, Kevin (1997) it's a growth business again: arms market. (arms sales increased 8% in 1996, totalling $40 billion; Saudi Arabia was the biggest buyer)(Brief Article)
U.S. News & World Report
____(1991) WHY INCREASE ARMS SALES? The Record (Bergen County, NJ)
Second of all, the Army needs to have the ability to rapidly and efficiently alter payment policies to reply to altering market conditions and goal requirements. Third, payment policies need to be straightened with bigger human capital approaches to produce the greatest worth and lessen expenses. Lastly, policy must support a hierarchy of strategic goals and results for efficiently contending for skill, motivating and fulfilling efficiency, and acknowledging unique contributions
Improvement of Supply Chain Management Tools and Processes for Ultimate Strategic Achievement of Success in Military and Civil Business Today, both public and private sector organisations of all sizes and types are faced with the same need to optimize their supply chain management processes to the maximum extent possible in order to achieve and sustain high levels of performance and productivity. Because supply chain management systems are frequently highly complex,
The lack of action over Rwanda should be the defining scandal of the presidency Bill Clinton. Yet in the slew of articles on the Clinton years that followed Clinton's departure from power, there was barely a mention of the genocide." The UN, pressured by the British and the U.S., and others, refused to use the word "genocide" during the event, or afterward when it issued its official statement of condemnation
A favorite target for conspiracists today as well as in the past, a group of European intellectuals created the Order of the Illuminati in May 1776, in Bavaria, Germany, under the leadership of Adam Weishaupt (Atkins, 2002). In this regard, Stewart (2002) reports that, "The 'great' conspiracy organized in the last half of the eighteenth century through the efforts of a number of secret societies that were striving for