Comparing 2 Legislators From 2 Different Parties Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
713
Cite

Legislators Two New Jersey State Legislators -- Biographies and Legislative and Ideological Histories of Democrat John D. Adler and Republican Joseph Palaia

This paper is a biographical paper on two state legislators from two different political parties, illustrating how the two of them compare on issues pertaining to judicial ethics and the environment of the state. The member of the majority party, Democrat Senator John D. Adler of the New Jersey State Legislature currently represents Cherry Hill, New Jersey, one of the southernmost counties of the state. Adler studied government at Harvard University, earning his A.B. In the subject, and later going on to earn his law school degree from the same university in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Adler is particularly noteworthy for his work on the New Jersey Israel Commission from 1995 to the present. He thus takes a strong interest in international as well as national affairs, although part of his interest in Israel is tied to Cherry Hill's large and passionately Jewish population. He also has notable service for the N.J. Intergovernmental Relations Commission from 1994-2002. This commission emphasizes New Jersey's...

...

Before he entered the New Jersey state legislature Adler was commended efforts on the Cherry Hill Township Council from 1988-89.
As is reflective of his advocate's background, today, Adler chairs the N.J. Senate's Judiciary committee. He has served in the N.J state senate from 1992 to the present, and has been active in the Democratic Party, serving as its Conference Chair from 2002-03. He also served as Assistant Minority Leader from 1994-2001.

Adler has been passionate in his desire to reform state government. He was the primary sponsor of a recent bill "S-4," designed to extend certain financial disclosure requirements to lobbying conducted through advertisements and direct mail to general public. He is also passionate about the environment, becoming the primary sponsor of recent bill "S264," designated the "Clean Indoors Air Act." Yet despite his previous service as…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Senator Joseph A. Palaia. (2004) New Jersey State Legislator Website. Retrieved on July 21, 2004. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/palaia.asp

Senator John A. Adler. (2004) New Jersey State Legislator Website. Retrieved on July 21, 2004. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/adler.asp


Cite this Document:

"Comparing 2 Legislators From 2 Different Parties" (2004, July 21) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparing-2-legislators-from-2-different-173233

"Comparing 2 Legislators From 2 Different Parties" 21 July 2004. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparing-2-legislators-from-2-different-173233>

"Comparing 2 Legislators From 2 Different Parties", 21 July 2004, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparing-2-legislators-from-2-different-173233

Related Documents

The best that they can hope for is to influence a political party to get behind their cause and vote to have it adopted. Political parties on the other hand, have the power and ability to change laws and mandates by their voting clout. References Democratic Party (accessed 5-1-07) http://www.democrats.org/a/party/history.html Interest Groups (accessed 5-1-07) http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0216125-00&templatename=/article/article.html Republican Party (accessed 5-1-07) http://www.mcgop.net/History.htm Walker, Jack L., Jr., Mobilizing Interest Groups in America (Univ. Of Mich. Press 1991).

However, class-based differences in party identification remained prominent and actually grew stronger in the 1970s and 1980s, with upper-class and middle-class individuals identifying more strongly with the Republican Party" (309). Likewise, Pomerantz (1999) notes that, "While people change their party identity only rarely, the significance of that affiliation waxes and wanes over time" (37). Citing the research conducted by Wattenberg based on data collected in the National Election Studies

Over the years, the electoral process has changed a lot. As per the original rules, each state legislature selected its electors. The electors would then assemble at a given time and vote for two people. The person with the majority of votes became the president and the runner-up became the vice-president. This system was in practice until the 1800 election. (the Presidential Electoral Process) By 1800, American politics were dominated

Beyond Separation of Powers As high school students we all learned about the Constitutional separation of powers. With each of the three branches of government -- the judicial, executive, and legislative -- having the power to limit the power of the others, no one aspect of government could hold the American people hostage. This was the structure that the Framers put into effect to ensure that Americans would have an efficient,

U.S. Congress is composed of two chambers, the House of Representatives (with 435 members representing fifty states) and the Senate (with 100 members, with two members elected from each State). The Republican and Democrat parties select their candidates for the two chambers of the Congress in primary elections, "election in which registered voters in a jurisdiction select a political party's candidate for a later election (nominating primary)" After winning a primary election,

Democratic and Republican parties have been able to maintain their strength and their membership numbers since the Civil War for both structural and ideological reasons. The ideological reasons are the most obvious to an observer and to many members of the parties; indeed it is because of the ideological positions of the two parties that people align themselves by party. The ideologies of each party are complex; a better