Paper Health Records And Electronic Records Comparison Essay

PAGES
1
WORDS
370
Cite

The key difference between electronic records and paper health records is that while electronic records are availed to users electronically via a wide range of devices such as computers, tablets, and smartphones; paper health records are presented in the traditional hard-copy format. In essence, both have their own downsides and the utilization of either calls for some trade-offs. To begin with, it should be noted that unlike paper health records (PHR), electronic health records (EHRs) come in handy in the further promotion of the confidentiality and safety of patient health information. This is particularly the case when deliberate measures are taken in this regard, i.e. via encryption and decryption as well as the utilization of firewalls (Kruse, Smith, Vanderlinden, and Nealand, 2017). On the other hand, PHR can easily be stolen or misplaced – effectively compromising the confidentiality of sensitive patient information/data. Secondly, in terms of ease of access and sharing, PHRs tend to be rather tedious on those two fronts (Hoffman, 2016). This is more so the case given that PHRs are maintained in a file system that effectively makes retrieval and sharing a time-consuming and imprecise undertaking. EHRs, on the other hand, can be accessed at the touch of a button and sharing of the same is incredibly easy. Essentially, sharing of the latter is largely instantaneous and could be done via a secure network to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive patient data. It is however important to note that as Hoffman (2016) observes, when it comes to cost, EHRs tend to cost more in terms of implementation and maintenance than PHRs. This effectively means that in implementing EHRs, healthcare institutions have to incur a significant cost in not only the purchase, but also the installation of EHRs. PHRs are relatively cost effective as only storage costs and human administrative costs are incurred.

References

Hoffman, S. (2016). Electronic Health Records and Medical Big Data: Law and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kruse, C.S., Smith, B., Vanderlinden, H. & Nealand, A. (2017). Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records. J Med Syst., 41(8), 127.

Cite this Document:

"Paper Health Records And Electronic Records Comparison" (2019, May 11) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-paper-health-records-electronic-records-essay-2173944

"Paper Health Records And Electronic Records Comparison" 11 May 2019. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-paper-health-records-electronic-records-essay-2173944>

"Paper Health Records And Electronic Records Comparison", 11 May 2019, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-paper-health-records-electronic-records-essay-2173944

Related Documents

Health Systems Management and Electronic Health Records Healthcare is an essential factor or tool in relation to the American society. The society of America has no national socialized healthcare system. In this research paper, the focus will be on the Medicare healthcare system in the context of the United States. The paper will focus on illustration of the concepts of the Medicare healthcare system, various management challenges, problems, and opportunities in

The other dimension is related but is definitely separate. Some end-users are not only uninformed on how to administer electronic health records, they may actively resist and otherwise undermine the setup and these people need to be identified or even removed if they will not play along. It cannot be denied that, when done properly, electronic health records allows for such a seamless and beautiful result. As such, people that

All three systems typically require a practice to install the EHR software onto on-site servers, although they all appear to require only standard "off-the-shelf" hardware, and all of them also offer Application Service Provider (ASP) access as an option. (McKesson, 2010, General Electric Corporation, 2010, Sage 2010). Because all three systems are applications that reside on the practice's hardware, back-up of the server data seems to fall on the shoulders

There may be specific circumstances for specific customers where these substitute options become more attractive, but as a whole, they exert little threat. 2. Barriers to Entry. Barriers to entry are modest. There are no significant technologies to acquire or license, no research and development investment, or expensive equipment needed. Existing firms do not possess patents that prevent other entrants from operating effectively. Some companies may choose to invest in more

However, with natural gas, production takes a long lead time -- drillers and processers cannot increase production capacity quickly to meet increased market demand, thus increased demand will start the price rising and keep it rising for a period of time until eventually supply catches up, or other market factors (such as a warm winter that reduces demand for heating gas) influence the price. Overall, prices for natural gas

However, because they make billing more efficient, the majority of large urban practice groups and hospitals have already made the switch to electronic records, according to Michael R. Costa, attorney and associate at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, in Boston, Mass. However, he adds, most of these organizations maintain warehouses where they store paper records that have been transcribed to electronic form. "There is resistance from some about going to a