Consensus Perspective Term Paper

Consensus Approach of Criminal Justice This is a paper that outlines the consensus approach in criminality and addresses the principles explained by Michalowski and Pound. It has 5 sources.

Among other approaches to criminal justice, the consensus approach is one that emphasizes the opinion of the whole society. These opinions are ones that are streamlined through legislation and reinforced through social institutions. This is the reason why social institutions reinforce the law through their actions of quelling social disturbances. In fact this is the reason why social institutions are referred to as the ideological repressive apparatus of a state. It is when these fail that the state repressive apparatus comes into action. However, for these institutions to carry out their actions it is necessary for individuals to first fulfill a criterion in order for them to deal with them. It is when individuals fit these descriptions that the individuals in society see the actions carried out by social institutions against the individuals as legitimate.

It must be realized that these actions carried out on the basis of an individual fitting a criterion, are ultimately an outcome of the values devised by the society. This is something that is outlined by Michalowski.

First of all, human beings have tried to understand the world, and in the process of this they have given certain actions specific meaning. And, as a result of this, values have been created, which are relevant to cultures.

According to the culture of a society, a particular lot of people may be termed as deviant if they adhere to certain activities that seen as immoral in the eyes of the society. Based on these...

...

It must be realized that certain acts are only seen as deviant according to the meaning that people give to it. Acts in themselves are not deviant until and unless people give them specific meaning.
Throughout history it has been known that human beings try to understand the world in easier ways, and so they have figured out ways to do so. Labeling is one of the ways that humans have chosen to understand the world and get a large number of people under their control. Crime, Inequality, and Justice (2003)

Without labeling individuals it would be difficult for social institutions to deal with people effectively. This refers to institutions such as the law-enforcing ones that have to control a large number of individuals who have broken the law. By terming them as criminals these individuals may be treated as such, and most actions carried out against them by the law would be legitimized in the eyes of society. It must be understood that the legitimization of the action taken against those that are termed as criminals is a result of the meaning that society has given to certain actions. Criminology today (2003)

According to the principles that Michalowski has established it is very fitting that social institutions come together in order to act in positive manners. This means that all actions carried out by social institutions are legitimized in the eyes of the society. This is because of the belief that laws reflect enforcement of social or religious values. These laws are supposed to represent social consciousness, and are also supposed to serve people well. Whether or not this is done it must be asserted that this is the aim in…

Sources Used in Documents:

Sources

Author not available, (Accessed on 1-4-2003). Criminology today: Chapter 9: Political Realities and Crime at http://www.prenhall.com/divisions/ECT/app/crim2day/html/chaplink.html

Author not available, (Accessed on 1-4-2003). The Roscoe Pound Papers: American Legal Manuscripts from the Harvard Law School Library at http://www.lexisnexis.com/academic/2upa/Aj/almPound.htm

Author not available, (Accessed on 1-4-2003). Criminal justice. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_justice

Author not available, (Accessed on 1-4-2003). Crime, Inequality, and Justice at http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:Apb-PLRUNJcC:www.roxbury.net/crg_c1.pdf+Michalowski+four+principles+criminals&hl=en&ie=UTF-8


Cite this Document:

"Consensus Perspective" (2003, April 01) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/consensus-perspective-146347

"Consensus Perspective" 01 April 2003. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/consensus-perspective-146347>

"Consensus Perspective", 01 April 2003, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/consensus-perspective-146347

Related Documents

Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing

Consensus and Conflict Views of Crime The consensus view of crime is that crime is equally abhorrent to all elements of society. Therefore, the criminal law, particularly what is criminalized and the proposed punishments for those crimes, is believed to reflect the thoughts of society as a whole. Consensus is used because it reflects the idea that there is general agreement among people about the laws. "According to this particular view,

Conflict/Crime Control Model vs. The Consensus/Due Process Model Over the years, theorists have developed several theories to describe crime as a social phenomenon. Two of today's most popular theories are the conflict/crime control model and the consensus/due process model. Both theories attempt to explain the origins of crime, but they approach crime from two very different perspectives. The conflict/crime control model is focused on crime control and aims to enforce the

interventionism from the perspective of realism vs. idealism. Realism is defined in relationship to states' national interests whereas idealism is defined in relation to the UN's Responsibility to Protect doctrine -- a doctrine heavily influenced by Western rhetoric over the past decade. By addressing the question of interventionism from this standpoint, by way of a case study of Libya and Syria, a picture of the realistic implications of "humanitarian

Anarchy is but one aspect of the Realist paradigm. Anarchy is the impetus for all other components of the Realist theory to come into play. Elements such as power, security dilemma's, balance of power, polarity and alliances and ultimately war are all outcrops of the existence of any real centralized power and an absence of true legitimacy in the form of a well established, respected, influential central government. Each

One could, for instance, examine the role that the authority structures of the Catholic Church have had in shaping the formation of societies and they way that they function. This form of analysis can also be extended to other religions - such as the role of power and conflict in a Muslim world and the role that religion plays in the coercive structures of many Middle Eastern societies. On the