Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Corporate social responsibility is a reflection of societal ethical norms. There is some disagreement in our society what the norms for corporations should be. A corporation is comprised of people, but the norms for corporations seem to be different from the norms for the people that comprise the corporation. This paper will explore these ideas to determine what corporate social responsibility is, and should be.
A corporation is a legal entity, but without the people that run it, a corporation is nothing. Thus, a corporation being a legal entity rather than a living entity -- the apparent exception to this reality in the United States notwithstanding -- a corporation cannot make decisions. It has no ability to conceive of anything, to have ethics, or indeed even to behave. In that sense, the idea of corporate social responsibility is an absurdity. A corporation has no greater capacity to make an ethical decision than does a cloud, an asteroid or a stapler. It is only the people who control the assets of a corporation that could ever have such capacity.
The people controlling the assets of a corporation can be viewed in two different ways. The first is that they are human beings, and being of free will...
Thus, their behaviors should always be bound by the ethics and norms of their society. Any act that would be deemed unacceptable in society for an individual cannot be condoned simply because the assets involved were corporate, given that an individual must still have made the decision. Morally, ethically, there is no distinction between the actions of individuals and those of corporations because a corporation cannot undertake an action. Legally, this is a different matter altogether, and evidently in the United States under law corporations can make these decisions on their own; they are people. This is indefensible idiocy, and a clear thinker should never conflate the legal world and reality, because they are by no means the same. Corporations cannot make decisions.
The second lens through which to look at the issue is that the people who make decisions on what to do with corporate assets are acting as proxies, for the shareholders presumably. This view, as espoused by Milton Friedman (1970), makes the case that managers should be solely concerned with using corporate assets to increase shareholder…
References
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved May 30, 2015 from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html
Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, And Business Law: The Fall of Enron and the Discussion of Morals in Business Ethics in business has continued to be a growing concern in the twenty-first century. In order to protect and attract stakeholders, companies have enforced social responsibility, while law has protected and ensured security to stakeholders through the passing of laws. Despite corporate social responsibility and federal law, individuals in some businesses still find means
591-2). The failure to integrate CSR initiatives into a larger development plan is another problem contributing to the lack of implementation of CSR projects. Projects are often driven by short-term expediency meaning that the decisions taken are at too low a level as to which projects to execute. There may be little coordination in determining the areas that will benefit and how the projects can be put together to contribute
Corporate Social Responsibility Literature Review a topic-Corporate Social Responsibility The term 'corporate social responsibility' is a social word that has often taken the world by a storm at its mention. Noya and Clarence (2007) in their book "The social economy: building inclusive economies" offers a succinct description and understanding of what normally takes place and get exemplified at the mention of this term in the business world. Many writers of business journals
Corporate Social Responsibility and Transnational Companies In this essay, I have discussed how essential Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is for the success of Transnational Corporations. UN Global Compact is also being discussed. I have also included case studies to support of Nike, Primark and Microsoft. Moreover, I have included positives and negatives about CSR and the factors that exist in CSR which may lead to the success of transnational corporations. Finally,
D.) Contribution The authors are making a major contribution by focusing on areas that have received limited amounts of study. This is helping to create new ideas about how a more diversified and active board of directors can help to improve social governance. As a result, there is discussion in how these ideas can be utilized in future studies (to help understand the challenges facing firms). ("Abstract Article Three," n.d.) Article Four: The
Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives A corporation that responds positively towards social issues is considered socially acceptable. There are some corporate social responsibility initiatives which the firm should take in order to get socially responsible. There are five main corporate social responsibility initiatives: Philanthropy, Work/Life programs, Community redevelopment, Acceptance of whistle blowers and Environmental protection. Philanthropy The first way is to donate a lot to charities. These include hospitals, colleges and nursing homes. Many