Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Walker (2011) did find, however, that drug courts, which are a new type of diversion program, are yielding promising results.
In the end, according to Walker (2011), it is a problem of prediction. As Walker (2011), states "some programs work for some offenders" (p. 277). The problem is accurately identifying which programs work for which offenders.
Whereas Walker was concerned with recidivism, Worrall's (2008) definition of rehabilitation includes "intervention that is intended to change offenders for the better" (p. 228). To address Walker's (2011) concern that some programs work for some offenders, Worrall (2008) explains that it is important to consider the risk, needs, and responsivity of offenders when planning interventions. These interventions include: cognitive skills such as morals training and reasoning training; anger management, victim awareness, and life skills training such as drug resistance skills, personal self-management,...
Worrall (2008) finds that morals and reasoning training favorably alters the behavior of low-level offenders. Also, according to Worrall (2008) treatment programs focusing on anger management and life skills training are promising, whereas programs focused on improving victim awareness do not. Finally, Worrall (2008) concludes that treatment aimed at rehabilitation is more effective than prison or other harsh sanctions, particularly when it is combined with cognitive-behavioral therapies.
While Walker and Worrall may disagree on the definition and effectiveness of efforts of rehabilitation, they both agree rehabilitation is not a cure all for all criminals. According to Walker (2011), the problem is prediction -- matching offenders with the appropriate rehabilitation program. Worrell (2008) that…
Whereas Walker was concerned with recidivism, Worrall's (2008) definition of rehabilitation includes "intervention that is intended to change offenders for the better" (p. 228). To address Walker's (2011) concern that some programs work for some offenders, Worrall (2008) explains that it is important to consider the risk, needs, and responsivity of offenders when planning interventions. These interventions include: cognitive skills such as morals training and reasoning training; anger management, victim awareness, and life skills training such as drug resistance skills, personal self-management, and general social skills.
Worrall (2008) reaches different conclusions than Walker and finds that rehabilitation is effective. Worrall (2008) finds that morals and reasoning training favorably alters the behavior of low-level offenders. Also, according to Worrall (2008) treatment programs focusing on anger management and life skills training are promising, whereas programs focused on improving victim awareness do not. Finally, Worrall (2008) concludes that treatment aimed at rehabilitation is more effective than prison or other harsh sanctions, particularly when it is combined with cognitive-behavioral therapies.
While Walker and Worrall may disagree on the definition and effectiveness of efforts of rehabilitation, they both agree rehabilitation is not a cure all for all criminals. According to Walker (2011), the problem is prediction -- matching offenders with the appropriate rehabilitation program. Worrell (2008) that offenders differ in their risk, needs, and responsivity and these issues must be considered when providing treatment programs.
Japanese Correctional System as Compared to the American Corrections System The Japanese correctional system places a strong emphasis on rehabilitation and preparing the prisoner for being released once again into society. The Japanese correctional system "is intended to resocialize, reform, and rehabilitate offenders" rather than enforce a system of retributive justice along the lines of the American model (Coutsoukis, 2004). This is why most sociologists state that the restorative philosophy of
Correctional institutions have enhanced in quality and condition over the years. What started out as dungeons and sewers in Rome, the conditions for correctional institutions have improved to quite an extent. In the 1980s, overcrowding became a renowned problem as it also went against the eighth amendment that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. (Carter & Glaser, 1977, p. 1) Increased crowdedness causes mental and physical damage to the inmates in
The needs principle says that interventions should target the known predictors of crime and recidivism for change. There are two types of predictors for recidivism: static predictors, such as criminal history, and dynamic predictors, such as antisocial values. Those predictors that can be changed are the predictors that should be targeted by rehabilitation programs. The dynamic factors that can be changed are: antisocial/procriminal attitudes, values, beliefs, and cognitive-emotional states,
In this drug court program there are five phases: a) detoxification (if necessary), comprehensive assessments, a short-term treatment plan and individual and group counseling services; and b) a more intensive individual treatment plan, group and individual therapy, weekly court hearings, meetings with the probation officer and "required attendance at AA 12 Step recovery meetings daily; c) the 2nd phase activities continue but in this phase they also focus on
While its goals may be commendable, restorative justice is nevertheless a disaggregated model. Uniting relational justice, participative or consensual justice and changing or improvement justice, restorative justice has become a concept that has something for everyone (Wilson, 2012). The Case for Rehabilitation The Attack on the Rehabilitative Ideal A premise that has endured all through the history of American corrections is that labors should be put forth to reform those who commit
Punishment Compared With the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation For most people within the criminal justice system, as well as society at large, rehabilitation and punishment are two choices which must be taken, rather than taking their synonymous meanings. They give the impression to be like possible synonyms or ways to refer to same processes. Is punishment rehabilitation? Or alternatively, is rehabilitation punishment (McNeill, forthcoming)? The supporters of rehabilitation view offending etched in