Criminal Justice Jurisdiction Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
545
Cite

Criminal Justice, Jurisdiction Explain what the term "jurisdiction" means.

Jurisdiction is defined as the "geographic area over which authority extends: legal authority; the authority to hear and determine causes of action" (Thefreedictionary.com, (n.d.)). An understanding of jurisdiction is needed to help determine where legal authority begins and ends. Legal cases need to be filed, heard and tried in an organized manner through the court system. This cannot happen if jurisdiction is unclear. Using geographic markers is the simplest way to determine jurisdiction. The easiest way to illustrate this is using the federal courts. Federal court jurisdiction covers the whole United States. State court jurisdictions cover each state. Simply put, jurisdiction determines which court hears which case. A person with a case cannot take their action to any court. They must determine which appropriate court is authorized...

...

For example, a general court could hear all trial cases while a specific court (such as traffic court) would only hear traffic cases. An example of a general court would be the Supreme Court of New York where any and all cases that travel to the top state level would be heard pending judge approval. Courts of limited jurisdiction usually preside over smaller cases and can operate under a variety of names including municipal, county or district courts (Siegel, 2010).
Identify the different types of court jurisdiction and how determination is made

The two main types of court jurisdiction are state courts of limited jurisdiction and courts of general jurisdiction. The limited jurisdiction courts can only hear cases that fall under their purview (Siegel, 2010).…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Thefreedictionary.com. Jurisdiction. Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jurisdiction.

Siegel, L.J. (2010). Introduction to Criminal Justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.


Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice Jurisdiction" (2011, October 17) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-jurisdiction-116746

"Criminal Justice Jurisdiction" 17 October 2011. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-jurisdiction-116746>

"Criminal Justice Jurisdiction", 17 October 2011, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-jurisdiction-116746

Related Documents

Criminal justice system normally refers to the compilation of the prevailing federal; state accompanied by the local public agencies those pacts with the crime problem. These corresponding agencies procedure suspects, defendants accompanied by the convicted offenders and are normally mutually dependent insofar as the prevailing decisions of the single agency influence other supplementary agencies (Cole & Smith, 2009). The fundamental framework of the underlying system is normally granted through the

Criminal justice system refers to either the state or federal set of agencies and processes which are created by governments to control crime and to engage in penalties and discipline on those who break the law and who hurt others or damage property. "There is no single criminal justice system in the United States but rather many similar, individual systems. How the criminal justice system works in each area depends

Does the criminal justice system discriminate? Provide support your position with reference to the various components of the process, and give an explanation for either why the system discriminates, or why it appears to discriminate. Yes, the criminal justice system discriminates. African-American males are overrepresented in every part of the criminal process, though there has been no good evidence to show that they actually engage in criminal behavior at rates

This may mean an expansion of white-collar task forces designed to investigate such crimes. Question Predictions are that terrorist will continue to commit heinous criminal acts against our citizens in the future. If this prediction comes true, what, if any, effects will this have on the corrections system. Will Criminal Justice Administrators need to rethink what "model" (more punitive or restorative model) of justice should be used if more and more

Criminal Justice: The Death Penalty Reasons for topic selection Causes of racial prejudice and discrimination Juvenile in delinquent society theory Culture and values Official and unofficial values The effectiveness of the death penalty The death penalty is irreversible The death penalty is barbaric Changes to the death sentence Implemented changes Sentencing guidelines Bifurcated trials Automatic appellate conviction review Proportionality review The importance of proposed changes Anticipated outcome Life imprisonment; alternative to death sentences The costs Decency standards Overall efficiency Policies in support of incarceration Conclusion References Background Despite the controversy over how effective it is

In the experimental community, the researchers instituted a media campaign to increase seat-belt usage, followed by increased police enforcement of the seat-belt law. It was found that the percentage of drivers using seat belts increased in the experimental community but remained stable or declined slightly in the comparison community (Piquero and Piquero, 2002). An example of the before-and-after design would be the analysis of the impact of the Massachusetts Bartley-Fox