Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In addition, breaking the children away from the family may foster hatred or further anxiety between the groups, and bringing the children back into the home after the couples have undergone counseling may subject them to an unintended stressor, further harming their relationship with one another. In this case, it is important for members of law enforcement to realize that each family makes mistakes, and that being a part of a family is -- for many -- a new experience. Children of divorced parents, abusive parents, etc. may indeed be covered by an explanation of social learning theory when they have trouble running a family unit. However, addressing problems with the family intact can be one way to insure that the legacy does not pass to the children of this family.
Another negative affect that this policy may have on the child is the fact that it, too, could be the stuff of ethical dilemma. Simply returning a child to a home because the parents have completed some courses does not mean that the child will be safe. Although many of those who abuse substances, spouses, and children, do so because they have learned the behavior in childhood, it is because they have a dangerous condition that can end up endangering the children even more. According to McCue (2007) spousal abuse and domestic violence are linked to high incidents of psychopathology and personality disorders such as antisocial personality disorder and post traumatic stress disorder. Although research decades ago argued that these people can be helped through treatment, this is not necessarily the case, as feminists during the feminist...
Thus, putting a child back into a home based solely on the fact that the parents have undergone treatment is not necessarily ensuring the safety of the child and reflects the belief that all cases of family domestic violence arise from the social learning theory.
Thus, for the safety of the child and the betterment of the family, it is important that Anytown rethink their policy. On one hand, the policy might be too harsh, removing children from a family that needs to work together. On the other, the policy could be far too lenient, putting children back in a home that may not be safe for them. For this reason, this policy needs to be rethought to reflect the parameters of possibilities involved in the issue.
References
Allen, J.R. And St. George, S.A. (2001). What Couples Say Works in Domestic Violence
Therapy. The Qualitative Report, 6(3), Retrieved August 14, 2009, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR6-3/allen.html
Burton, D.L., Miller, D.L., and Shill, C.T. (2002). A social learning theory comparison of the sexual victimization of adolescent sex offenders and nonsexual offending male delinquents. Child Abuse and Neglect. 26(9), 893-907.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2009). Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities:
Statistics and Interventions. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from the Child Welfare Information Gateway Web Site: http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/fatality.cfm#prevent
Firstly, there is exposure to a model, which however does not necessarily facilitate learning. This is followed by knowledge of the model's behavior and the results of that behavior and finally the acceptance or rejection of the model by the individual as a guide to his or her actions (Weiner, 1980, p. 230). In this regard one can refer back as well to the work of Tarde who suggested
Domestic Violence and Social Learning Theory Domestic Violence on Children and Social Learning Theory Domestic Violence on Children, Juvenile Delinquency and Social Learning Theory Domestic Violence on Children and Juvenile Delinquency in the light of Social Learning Theory This research paper includes and talks about the global issue of family or domestic violence experienced and observed by children. The first part defines and explains the domestic violence and child abuse. The second part explains
Social Learning Theory Paragraph 1 (Summary of the Lessons Learnt from the Reading Material and Two Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Discussing (the Social Learning Theory) One Theory) When we are born into the world, we simply come here not knowing how to act or behave. Throughout my readings, in the textbook, Essential Criminology, and scholarly journal articles, I have found that the social learning theory explains how humans learn to behave
If integration with a conventional social group helps prevent suicide and "delinquency" (Hirschi 1969) and motivates people to fight, make sacrifices for a community, or commit deviant acts on behalf of a sub-cultural group, it should affect almost all forms of deviance. The absence of social integration with conventional groups should be influential in psychotic behavior (unless that specific behavior is organically determined and totally uncontrollable); without integration into
If human beings categorize behavior, experiences and events in a way they appear as representations of reality with effects that people can experience positively or negatively. Crime is examples of these social realities that people can collectively construct, deconstruct, and replace with less harmful realities (Rafter 1990). Crime is a violation of criminal law while deviance is a threatening and moral offensive behavior. Crime is harmful because it leads
Self-Regulation Bandura understands that the development of self is influenced by the environment but that the individual also has significant responsibility of determinism that makes the individual responsible for his or her behaviors. According to Boeree self-regulation is absolutely essential to behavior control and provides the backbone of human personality. Boeree describes the three steps that Bandura suggests that contribute to self-regulation; self-observation, or the process of observing our own behavior