David Hume/Williams James William James Term Paper

Length: 8 pages Sources: 7 Subject: Mythology - Religion Type: Term Paper Paper: #43914158 Related Topics: Philosophers, Existence Of God, Free Will, Metaphysics
Excerpt from Term Paper :

James believed that belief in God could be contemplated in terms of "live and dead hypotheses" (James 2010). He argues that when one is trying to find an argument for God existing or God not existing, we must consider three things: 1) Living or dead 2) Forced or unavoidable; and, 3) Momentous or trivial. He says, "and for our purposes we may call an option a genuine option when it is of the forced, living, and momentous kind" (2010). For James, a living option is when there are two hypotheses that are "live ones" (2010). He says that if he were to say that someone should become a theosophist or a Mohammedan, the option is probably dead since for that person both hypotheses seem dead. Though if he were to tell a person to be agnostic or be Christian, the person is trained in some way to a follow a certain belief (2010).

The next example he gives is to tell a person to either go outside with an umbrella or don't. There is not a "genuine option, for it is not forced" (James 2010). The person could choose to not go outside at all. Along those same lines, if he told a person, "love me or hate me," "call my theory true or call it false," there is an option that is avoidable since the person could remain indifferent (2010). However, if he were to say, "accept this truth or go without it" (2010), the option is forced because one cannot do anything else. "Every dilemma based on a complete logical disjunction, with no possibility of not choosing, is an option of this forced kind" (2010).

Lastly, he explains the difference between momentous and trivial. He says that an option is momentous when a person has the chance to do something that is unique. "He who refuses to embrace a unique opportunity loses the prize as surely as if he tried and failed" (James 2010). The option is trivial when the opportunity isn't all that unique or when the stakes are not that significant, or if the decision is reversible (2010).

James believes that people can choose to believe in something or they can choose not to believe, or they even choose to wait to believe in something, but in choosing one of these things, they are essentially choosing their own fate. James was an adamant believer in free will. He thought that by changing our thoughts, we could essentially change our lives. While he believed in free will though, he also couldn't help but see that people who believed in determinism had a very strong argument. Because of this, his arguments on determinism weren't really that powerful. Rather, his argument for free will was very powerful. This is the way in which he showed where his beliefs lay. Free will for James was simply more rational than determinism. It was also a much more positive way to see life and the universe at large. Because of the fact that he was a pragmatist as well, his views on morality lay in the idea that we should act in the ways that make sense to us as individuals. There wasn't a strong argument made by James it seems when it comes to free will either. He simply tells his audience what he believes and why he believes it (free will because it is more optimistic and he can make sense of his life that way). His belief in free will plays into his ideas on ethics because it all comes down to people...


Truth is that which works in the way of belief. "True ideas lead us into useful verbal and conceptual quarters as well as directly up to useful sensible termini. They lead to consistently, stability and flowing human intercourse" but "all true process must lead to the face of directly verifying sensible experiences somewhere" (James 1907). This means that the value of truth relies upon its usefulness to the person who holds it and this was the whole idea behind pragmatism (Cryer 2010).

When it comes to free will vs. determinism, Hume thought that there wasn't any single action that could be deemed random. He thought that everything that we (humans) do is dictated by the way we were raised as well as our psyches -- but only to a certain extent. He went back to his cause and effect theories by saying that there is quite a strong cause and effect relationship between nature and our own actions. In essence, he is saying that people are predictable and that people don't often stray from their predictability, which is what takes away our free will and makes determinism a very valid argument.

When it comes to ethics, Hume believed that these came from utility as opposed to God's will. These are things that cannot be found in a scientific way. There are some things that people choose to do and there are some things that people don't choose to do and those are always different depending on the individual. What is right for one person may not be right for another. Our ethics have to do with our own ideas about what we think is right not only for ourselves but for the rest of mankind. He believed that people do, overall, tend to sympathize with others and that we are made this way.

Hume was also of the belief that reason does not play a part in our ethical decision -- that is, we don't reason when it comes to deciding what we are going to do or not do. He thought that humans reacted or acted according to their passions. Reason is not what motivates people to act.

While Hume and James varied on many of their theories regarding ethics, God, free will and determinism, they are two philosophers that are oftentimes compared and contrasted by philosophers. Both philosophers have changed the way that individuals view themselves, their "selves," the way the view the existence of God and evil, as well as the purpose of man in the world. Are we here for a reason and can we guide our lives? Or is everything predetermined? While they varied in their theories on these topics, both have compelling arguments for the student of philosophy.


Cryer, a.B. (2010). "William James explained." Everything explained. Accessed on January 25, 2011: http://everything.explained.at/William_James/#Ref-5

Damasio, a. (2010). Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon; 1st edition.

James, W. (1907). "Pragmatism's Conception of Truth." Lecture 6 in Pragmatism: A New

Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman Green and Co>

James, W. (2010). The will to believe: and other essays in popular philosophy. Nabu Press.

Passer, M.W.,…

Sources Used in Documents:


Cryer, a.B. (2010). "William James explained." Everything explained. Accessed on January 25, 2011: http://everything.explained.at/William_James/#Ref-5

Damasio, a. (2010). Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon; 1st edition.

James, W. (1907). "Pragmatism's Conception of Truth." Lecture 6 in Pragmatism: A New

Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman Green and Co>
Kemerling, G. (2002). "Hume: empiricist naturalism." Philosophy pages. Accessed on January 25, 2011: http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/4t.htm

Cite this Document:

"David Hume Williams James William James" (2011, January 26) Retrieved August 19, 2022, from

"David Hume Williams James William James" 26 January 2011. Web.19 August. 2022. <

"David Hume Williams James William James", 26 January 2011, Accessed.19 August. 2022,

Related Documents
Philosophy of Science As Developed by Empiricists David Hume and...
Words: 876 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 91600864

philosophy of science as developed by empiricists such as David Hume and completed by the logical positivist group. Why do they think truth can be best found by using the senses, the experimental method, and probability? Explain the verifiability theory and its meaning for such subjects as God, the super-natural, justice, morality, and political science. What are the advantages and the limitations of this philosophical view? The "Verifiability" or "Verificationist

Truth One Cannot Simply Define
Words: 3618 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Physics Paper #: 44253527

Two belief systems, then -- true believe, and justified true belief (Hauser, 1992). Humans, however, according to Pierce, turn justified true beliefs into true beliefs by converting them into axioms. Once we have proven something there is no need to prove it again, and we use the part that was proven before to further extend our study and the inquisition of knowledge. And so it becomes necessary to accept things

Philosophy Socrates to Sartre and
Words: 2412 Length: 7 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 58399067

Berkley stated that because the senses were potentially faulty, everyone's sense perceptions and thus everyone's 'truth' was unique and variable. However, most empiricists like Locke believed that some (few) things could be known with certainty, like shape and color, even if other properties of things could not be known. The empiricists come from the Aristotelian rather than the Platonic tradition of philosophy, and had rigorous standards of truth based upon

History Colonial America Samuel Adams and the Founding Brothers
Words: 1759 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 88460965

Ellis holds that America, at its outset, was plagued by an identity crisis: Americans who asserted an essentially 'Republican' identity and revolted against Britain for certain reasons were at ends with Americans who asserted an essentially 'Federal' identity and revolted against Britain for other reasons. In textbooks these are associated with the persons of Jefferson and Hamilton, two of the first cabinet members. They are also associated with Sam Adams,

Thomas Jefferson: A Pioneer in
Words: 5416 Length: 18 Pages Topic: Teaching Paper #: 9505486

Jefferson's Principles and their Impact on Education Jefferson's radical beliefs in the inherent moral and developmental capacities of humans, and in their capacities to take part to participatory democracy, in turn reinforced his enduring commitment to an education that would be accessible to all. Jefferson was well aware that democracy could only work properly when the people were both virtuous and enlightened. From these notions that people were naturally virtuous but not

Does the Fisher, Ury Model Work
Words: 29882 Length: 120 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 38724917

Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of