Democracy According To Dahl; Schmitter Term Paper

For Russia, by contrast, a public's absence of exposure to the systems and conditions of democracy has rendered a people today deeply susceptible to exploitation, with the current Russian leader, former chief
of the Soviet KGB, Vladamir Putin, imposing suppression of political
opposition, journalistic freedom and social liberties. Here, democracy has
proven less-than-feasible due to an absence of internal will to or resource
to seize on the opportunity. A history of oppression has rendered
democracy abstract and unattainable, even in the face of charades such as
Russian free elections.
In an article by Dahl, we are presented with an argument recommending
certain ground rules for the effective adoption of democratic order. Among
them, the author makes a strong case in favor of the maintenance of
normalized electoral periods and processes. As the author argues, "if we
accept the desirability of political equality, then every citizen must have
an...

...

An over-emphasis on electoral procedure may well diminish the availability of time, interest and priority for policy affairs.

Works Cited
Dahl, R.A. (2005). What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy
Require. Political Science Quarterly, 120(2), 187-197.

Schmitter, P.C. & Karl, T.L. (1991) What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not.
Journal of Democracy.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited
Dahl, R.A. (2005). What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy
Require. Political Science Quarterly, 120(2), 187-197.

Schmitter, P.C. & Karl, T.L. (1991) What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not.
Journal of Democracy.


Cite this Document:

"Democracy According To Dahl Schmitter" (2008, June 30) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/democracy-according-to-dahl-schmitter-29108

"Democracy According To Dahl Schmitter" 30 June 2008. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/democracy-according-to-dahl-schmitter-29108>

"Democracy According To Dahl Schmitter", 30 June 2008, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/democracy-according-to-dahl-schmitter-29108

Related Documents

Democracy / Liberty Is direct democracy desirable and/or possible today? Is direct democracy desirable and/or possible today? The question is addressed first theoretically, with reference to Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws, which actually categorizes direct democracy as one of the corruptions into which a democratic system can descend, by an insistence on too much egalitarianism. Direct democracy is considered as an ideal, which is desirable insofar as it offers a critique of

P). Regarding freedom of association, the same concerns itself with permitting people in a given society to collectively defend, pursue as well as express those interests they regard or consider common. This freedom by virtue of inclusion into various human rights instruments as well as constitutions is considered one of the basic freedoms. Sometimes used synonymously with freedom of assembly, freedom of expression could also entail the freedom to gather for

Democracy In some quarters, democracy has been regarded one of mankind's greatest institutional achievements. With that in mind, democracy as a concept has been subject to extensive research over time and in a way, these studies have helped us understand the very nature of democracy and democratization. In this text, I will briefly explore the British and the American constitution with an aim of finding out which of the two is

Democracy in Ancient Greece Class XXXX, Section XXXX, Fall, 2012 The term democracy was invented by ancient Greece, and it came about through the system of involving all the people in ruling of their land. The ancient Athenian Greeks have been credited with developing democratic rule. Though their governing system may not have been very democratic as present day democracies, it allowed participation of diverse social class of people. This paper will

Democracy in Tunisia
PAGES 6 WORDS 1961

Democracy in Tunisia Democratization is a process that involves a transition advocated by either people, or political leaders who eliminate authoritarian systems and created democratic systems of government. However, in most cases, the people initiated the change, which the political leaders had no, option, but join the people (Huntington 109). Owing to the many forms of democratic regimes, variations are inevitable. Some of the regimes include parliamentary and presidential regimes. Some

Democracy In a fair and free election, the resultant outcome comes from the majority ruling of votes. In an ideal democratic environment, such votes are the consequence of all participant voters -- the legitimate populace as allowed for such voting -- and thus officials are elected in service of the majority of the peoples. However, this utopic democracy is limited in that not all participant voters are knowledgeable in decisions affecting