His topic is one that arouses anger in many, because their faith does not allow them to see his truth. Is it only Sagan's truth? This analysis illustrates that through clear presentation, concise case building, appeal to emotion on a familiar level, and common values, that the truth belongs to everyone. He does not profess to have all the answers. The author simply points to the consequences of ignorance in the past and the possible penalty of ignorance for the future. He allows for counter argument and refutes each with clearly defined logic. He does not allow for...

He writes, "When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined is surely spiritual" (29).
This may not be enough for some. Sagan believes the impediment to scientific thinking is political and hierarchical (311). Considering the current climate of our world, how many candles will it take to lift us out of the twenty-first century?

Works Cited

Petraglia-Bahri, Joseph. Page on Greek Argument <

etrieved November 20, 2004 at http://www.sheftman.com/eng2f03/rhetoric.html

Sagan, Carl. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. Random House: New York. 1995.