Disparity And Discrimination In The Criminal Justice System Research Paper

Disparity and Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System Discrimination in the justice system is the dissimilarity based on the difference in treatment given to people regardless of their qualifications or behavior. The criminal justice system has different forms of discrimination including pure justice, contextual discrimination, institutionalized discrimination, and systematic discrimination. Every stage of the criminal justice system experiences systematic discrimination. Further, this form of discrimination occurs without variation in all corners of the world. This implies that systematic discrimination happens when a certain gender, ethnic, age or race group encounters discrimination in different parts of the world. Critics are of the opinion systematic discrimination does not exist while other believes that it exists when groups of people encounter consistent discrimination in the criminal justice system (Robinson & Williams, 2009).

Institutionalized discrimination is associated with disparities in the results and not in the policies. Institutionalized discrimination is based on the aspect of results and not race, gender, or ethnicity. An example of institutionalized discrimination is where a police officer whom normally patrols in minority or poor neighborhoods frequently because of the high rates of crime. Therefore, minority and poor areas are likely to experience high rates of arrests. The variation in the arrests made in the middle class area vs. The minority area is a result of policies enforced by law practices. Contextual discrimination is a form of discrimination that exists at certain times, in some places and some contexts. Previous...

...

In conclusion, pure justice is a concept that demonstrates that discrimination does not occur at any place or time in the justice system (Mustard, 2009).
Both disparity and discrimination occur within the system of criminal justice at one phase or another. Nevertheless, experts must assess the decision in order to establish whether it was made based on legitimate factors such as criminal records of the offender. As discussed earlier, discrimination forms are found in the arrest directions while disparities occur during sentencing. In order to establish elements that influenced the decision, experts must analyze the intention of the person making the decision within the system of the criminal justice. For instance, it must be analyzed whether a sentence given to an offender was because of the offender's criminal record or whether the judge was biased in the sentence (Walker, Spohn & DeLone, 2004).

However, it is almost impossible to enjoy utmost pure justice because the criminal justice is system is influenced by various factors. Unlike discrimination, disparity is based on the explanation of different legitimate factors. The key variation between discrimination and disparity is extralegal or legal factors. Therefore, when conclusions are made based on the degree of seriousness of the crime and the prior criminal record of the offender, it results into disparity. Nevertheless, when decisions are made based on gender, lifestyle, social class, ethnicity or race, the result is discrimination (Robinson & Williams, 2009). Disparity implies that a…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Mustard, B. (2009). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S.

Federal Courts. New York: Springer.

Robinson, M. & Williams, M. (2009). The myth of a fair criminal justice system. South Carolina:

Edward Elgar Publishing.


Cite this Document:

"Disparity And Discrimination In The Criminal Justice System" (2013, January 19) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disparity-and-discrimination-in-the-criminal-77362

"Disparity And Discrimination In The Criminal Justice System" 19 January 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disparity-and-discrimination-in-the-criminal-77362>

"Disparity And Discrimination In The Criminal Justice System", 19 January 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disparity-and-discrimination-in-the-criminal-77362

Related Documents

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Laws: Mandatory minimum sentences, which were rare in the criminal law or justice system, have experienced a remarkable increase in popularity. As a political phenomenon, the policy has enjoyed broader bi-partisan support since mid-1980s as the U.S. Congress has continued to enact new measures for containing mandatory minimum sentences. The major goal of the Mandatory Minimum Sentence Laws is basically to prevent the judicial trivialization of serious drug

CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH ASSESSMENTCriminal Justice Research AssessmentSeveral months ago, I came across a 2013 research article titled, �No evidence of racial discrimination in criminal justice processing: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.� The said research article, - authored by Beaver, DeLisi, Wright, Boutwell, Barnes, and Vaughn � indicated that although there is indeed evidence of racial disparity in the criminal justice system in as far as the

Does the criminal justice system discriminate? Provide support your position with reference to the various components of the process, and give an explanation for either why the system discriminates, or why it appears to discriminate. Yes, the criminal justice system discriminates. African-American males are overrepresented in every part of the criminal process, though there has been no good evidence to show that they actually engage in criminal behavior at rates

Criminal justice is about the laws which are related to criminal behaviour. Criminal justice includes the area where judiciary is involved for e.g., police and lawyers. Lawyers are directly associated with the crime because they can defend or prosecute the criminals. As a professional field of study criminal justice involves studying the behaviour. The aim of the study is to gain knowledge and awareness of rules, laws and rights of

Choices, controlled by fear are another core principle that advocates for fear inducement that will enable individuals keep away from crime. This principle supports three strikes legislation, since with a repetition of crime it comes with a severe judgment that enables first crime offenders fear and keep away from crime. Core principle of severity calls for a severe punishment on a violent crime and depending on the nature of

Baker reviewed three landmark Supreme Court decisions on capital punishment and concluded that the death penalty is capriciously imposed on Black defendants and thus serves the extra-legal function of preserving majority group interests. He viewed discrimination in capital sentencing as deliberate and identified the primary reasons why Black defendants with white victims have been denied fairness in capital sentencing. These are prosecutorial discretion in the selective prosecution of capital