Medical specialists suggest the use of prenatal screening, as it will identify the possible risks of: the pregnancy and the available options for assessing / treating the fetus' health risks. Even though genetic testing incorporates numerous benefits, it is still important to remember that it involves risks as well. This is why issues surrounding: the moral and ethical considerations are increasing on DNA-based tests.
In every test, there are: ethical, legal and social implications involved. These will depend upon the objectives behind the examination. In medical cases, it is important to determine if there are possible treatments after the diagnosis. Moreover, the reasons of every decision are important, particularly when it is a prenatal case that is being tested. Nevertheless, all information about the patient must remain private. This is mainly because, of the outcome of genetic testing is fully related to the identification of the patient and his family (Devettere, 2009). As, it must be kept confidential in order to avoid any kind of favoritism brought on by: disseminating the patient's information.
In genetic testing, the patient's disclosure of this information is very essential in every facet of his life. For instance, if the health history of a patient's family determined that he is at risk of acquiring a genetic disorder. A DNA-based test can identify options that can treat the disease. Moreover, it can spot the possibility of the other family members developing the same disease and how it can be prevented from spreading to their offspring.
In prenatal genetic testing, it is important that the patient is informed about: every aspect of the test and the results of their reproductive decision-making (Rehmann-Sutter & Muller, 2009). Failure to provide all the necessary information of the test will deprive the patient of: the chance to evaluate and decide whether or not to continue the pregnancy (when the fetus is determined to have genetic disorder). It is an ethical obligation to present...
As a part of a woman's reproductive freedom, she has the right to terminate her pregnancy (Sanger, 2005). Moreover, the independence of a pregnant woman and her partner is established, when all information pertinent to their reproductive decision-making are provided.
In this case, the parents should know the information on the developing fetus. To include: its health condition, the presence of anomalies and its implications. As stated in the principle of beneficence, physicians must encourage and support the well-being of their patients by preventing any form of harm for occuring (Jecker, Jonsen & Pearlman, 2007). The growing access and utilization of genetic testing entails appropriate measurements in disseminating information about all the details of a DNA-based test to its patient. This is important, because it is highlighting the overall benefits and drawbacks of genetic testing. At the same time, it is illustrating the ethical and legal challenges the patient will face (if they decided to continue with the pregnancy). In many ways, one could argue that this is one the biggest issues that will continually be faced in the future.
Barigozzi, F., Henriet, D. (2009). Genetic information: Comparing alternatives regulatory approaches when prevention matters. Universita degli Studie, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche.
Devettere, R.J. (2009). Practical decision making in health care ethics: Cases and concepts. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Jecker, N.A., Jonsen, A.R., Pearlman, R.A. (2007). Bioethics: An introduction to the history, methods and practice. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Jones, N.L., Smith, A.M. (2005). Genetic information: Legal and law enforcement issues. New York: Nova Publishers.
Rehmann-Sutter, C., Muller, H. (2009). Disclosure dilemmas: Ethics of genetic prognosis after the right to know/not to know debate. United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Sequeiros, J., & Guimaraes, B. (2008). Definitions of genetic testing. Europe: EuroGentest Network of Excellent Project.
Sugarman, J., Sulmasy, D.P. (2010). Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Widdows, H., & Mullen, C. (2009). The governance of genetic information: Who decides?. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Ziegler, A., Konig, I.R., & Pahlke, F. (2010). A statistical approach to genetic epidemiology:…
This past two weeks have been really helpful for deepening my understanding of how nursing practice can have a direct impact on population health as well as improving individual health outcomes. Week one was particularly challenging as we addressed the principles of genetics, from the basic structures of DNA and RNA, to their functions in the body and throughout the life span. I had learned about replication, transcription, and translation
1. The concerns Tonya and Lisa have regarding genetic testing raises several ethical questions that Dugas (2005) outlines. The right to self-determination is central in matters linked to genetic testing, and nurses do need to understand their role in providing informed consent when patients are faced with a decision similar to that of Tonya and Lisa (Dugas, 2005). In addition to providing patients with all the information they need to
Genetic Disease It is very clear, that today's focus on genetic technology and its claim has been having some vital insinuations for healthcare at the present time and also in the future. Nurses need to recognize the position of assimilating new knowledge of genetics into their performances and be capable of helping patients to be able to manage with their genetic foundation of various diseases. Nurses likewise will need to know
Genetic Disease Diagnosis, Screening, Treatment, And Advocacy This case study involves a couple who are expecting a child. Testing has been conducted identifying the unborn child having the condition of Tay-Sachs disease. The nurse in this scenario will identify interdisciplinary team members and create a teaching plan to educate the couple about this disease. This work in writing will discuss three ethical implications regarding the availability of personal genetic information and
Ethical-Legal Nursing Discussions - Part II Moral Distress and Moral Integrity Comment by Ileana: OverviewMoral Distress in Advanced Practice NursingThe meaning of moral distress has been changing in nursing. No definition fits all dilemmas. Moral distress includes cultural beliefs, religious beliefs, educational level, and outside forces that influence thinking. It is important to learn that moral distress is an emotion managed by coping and emotional intelligence. Analyze the difference between moral distress
" The Ecumenical Review, 54. Kneen looks at agricultural genetic engineering and takes the view that because agricultural genetic engineering may help solve food shortage problems as well as enhance the environment, such activities should be looked at positively. Kneen puts good arguments together to make his points, but also writes from a biased viewpoint, so his article should be used in conjunction with other writers who are not quite so