Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Starring Hugh Grant, Gene Hackman, and Sarah Jessica Parker, the 1996 film Extreme Measures addresses classic bioethics principles. The most significant ethical principle the film presents is related to testing on human subjects. However, this subject is presented in the film as being linked to another significant biomedical ethical issue, and that is patient informed consent. Within these two issues are embedded a series of other issues, such as the social value principle as it applies to the medical research.
Dr. Myrick (Gene Hackman) operates under the social value principle exclusively, to the point where he systematically ignores almost every other bioethical principle. He violates patient rights by not acquiring the informed consent of the individuals by disclosing that they might die from his treatments, and he also treats the homeless people like their lives do not matter, as if they are disposable. Patient autonomy is violated and social justice issues are violated. Moreover, it can be said that even though Mr. Myrick does have some good intentions in finding a cure for paralysis, which would benefit many people if he were to find the cure, that in the meantime, he is not upholding the ethical obligation to do no harm (non-maleficence). Mr. Myrick seems to be a harsh utilitarian. He utilizes people for his own gain as well as for the presumed social gains that might come...
Whether the medical research is for paralysis or for cancer, it would not matter.
Testing on human subjects is always a tricky issue in bioethics. The people who are participants in biomedical research are frequently as they are in this film: powerless. They are poor or disenfranchised. It is an ethical obligation to refrain from taking advantage of people by using them for medical research. At the very least, the patients need informed consent. If the homeless people know what they are getting themselves into, then some might actually consent -- but that still would not make the testing ethical because it would violate the codes of ethics under which doctors operate, in which non-maleficence remains important.
Guy (Hugh Grant) is a doctor who believes more in the established biomedical norms and principles. His view is based on a deontological ethical stance: the ends do not justify the means. People should never be used for medical research if (a) it is…
References
Apted, M. (1996). Extreme Measures. [Feature Film].
Emanuel, E., Abdoler, E. & Stunkel, L. (n.d.). Research ethics. NIH. Retrieved online: https://bioethics.nih.gov/education/FNIH_BioethicsBrochure_WEB.PDF
Society at large does not and would not permit risking harm to humans in order to avoid using animals for research (Animals pp). The pharmaceutical industry uses animals only when research cannot be accomplished in other ways, and always with care (Animals pp). If society wants to relieve conditions such as epilepsy, asthma, multiple sclerosis, and heart disease, then animals will continue to be need for research (Animals pp). Although it
Clinical Research Ethics Medical research is the most sensitive field of research in the entire field of academia. It is governed by several rules, regulations, and ethical standards. For instance, no research endeavor is allowed in case it hurts the life of any human being whether directly or indirectly. Secondly, any research that is to be done must meet environmental conservation measures and should not deride or harm human dignity in
The Concerns of Medical Marijuana: There are a variety of concerns with the legalization of medical marijuana. At first glance, the safety of marijuana for medicinal use appears to not be in question; however, most testing has been conducted on those casual users who are young and healthy. This does not necessarily mean these same findings will translate to ill patients or those who use marijuana on a continual basis. As
animals for testing [...] why we should use animals for testing. It will include arguments on why using animals for testing is a widespread and scientifically sound practice. The use of animals in testing has been going on for thousands of years, and has led to some of the most significant and live saving medical breakthroughs on the planet. Medical testing using animals should certainly be humane, but should
against experimentation on animals, and some are more compelling than others. Some people suggest that the practice is immoral because choosing to experiment upon animals is directly analogous to racial or sexual discrimination; or more closely related to discrimination on the basis of mental capacity. Others contend that it is wrong because, by their estimations, no clear advances in medical research have been made through animal experimentation, and alternative
Medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=1&rnd=414.848519162785)." March 1, 2007 Lester Grinspoon One of the more controversial uses of marijuana is the fact that it is believed to alleviate inflammation which opens the doors for arguments with regard to disorders including fibromyalgia which doctors still debate the existence of. However, as long as the patient is suffering and can match the set criteria for the disorder, who is society to argue that it does not exist and