Focus Groups For Criminal Offenders Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1160
Cite

P. fundamentals using If.. Then connectives validated according to real life instances. I would then present participants with a questionnaire regarding their experiences of the sessions, involving questions such as which type of exercise / discussion they felt to be more useful, which empowered them more, and which produced greater action-oriented processing. I would use a focus group for various reasons: Focus groups are helpful in evaluation research or in understanding how people regard a specific experience or event (Krueger, 1994). More importantly, focus groups have the advantages of flexibility, economy of time, and direct contact between researchers and participants.

Hypothesis

Human reasoning is conducted in terms of cycles of rule-based If/Then/Therefore hypothetico-predictive (H.P.) reasoning, presumably because the brain is "hard-wired" to process information in this way (Sternberg, 2001). My idea, therefore, is that individuals may achieve independent reasoning by reducing problems to their very core (i.e. p and q exist -- or my mother murdered my aunt -- what should I do); brainstorming solutions (s, t, u, v; e.g. 'killing her, reporting her to police and so forth); assessing these solution according to Reality (thereby averting impact of emotions) ("if p then q") followed by comparing the expected conclusion with predicted reality. Going to the core of the matter may not only help clients, in general, achieve independent solutions to their problems, but may also reduce recidivism that frequently (although not always) occurs as a result of weak problem and decision making ability.

Part 2

According to Office of Policy...

...

Department of Justice (USDOJ), 2010). Some of the statistics in the 2010 report state that within the first three years of release from incarceration due to discharge over 2/3 are arrested again. Over 50% of them face conviction due to a new crime. More than half of the criminals are sent back to prison for a new crime serving another sentence.
In addition to these statistics there were over 1,500 offenders that had as part of their terms parole, supervision program such as focus groups that are designed to transition them into civilian life. Of those the recidivism was significantly lower than for those released directly into civilian life. (USDOJ, 2010).

The rates for those that were part of a supervisory transition such as a focus group or parole were 24% and 28% respectively. This would indicate that with assistance of a supervisory focus group, offenders are close to 25% more successful in transitioning back into public life (USDOJ, 2010).

There are Parole officers and supervisory programs that apply Johari window concept a way to learn more about their parolees in the attempt to assist them with personal challenges that interfere with their adaptation to civil life. The strategy for the Johari Window calls for getting insight of how the parolee sees himself or herself to gain an understanding of how others see them (Mckean & Ransford, 2004). This allows them to gain a perspective of what others may be thinking or feeling as well. Building a relationship with a parole officer starts out for many offenders as a

Sources Used in Documents:

In addition to these statistics there were over 1,500 offenders that had as part of their terms parole, supervision program such as focus groups that are designed to transition them into civilian life. Of those the recidivism was significantly lower than for those released directly into civilian life. (USDOJ, 2010).

The rates for those that were part of a supervisory transition such as a focus group or parole were 24% and 28% respectively. This would indicate that with assistance of a supervisory focus group, offenders are close to 25% more successful in transitioning back into public life (USDOJ, 2010).

There are Parole officers and supervisory programs that apply Johari window concept a way to learn more about their parolees in the attempt to assist them with personal challenges that interfere with their adaptation to civil life. The strategy for the Johari Window calls for getting insight of how the parolee sees himself or herself to gain an understanding of how others see them (Mckean & Ransford, 2004). This allows them to gain a perspective of what others may be thinking or feeling as well. Building a relationship with a parole officer starts out for many offenders as a


Cite this Document:

"Focus Groups For Criminal Offenders" (2011, November 11) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/focus-groups-for-criminal-offenders-47345

"Focus Groups For Criminal Offenders" 11 November 2011. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/focus-groups-for-criminal-offenders-47345>

"Focus Groups For Criminal Offenders", 11 November 2011, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/focus-groups-for-criminal-offenders-47345

Related Documents

For example, Cook County, IL, has built a network of support for juvenile female offenders within the local community. The county has developed its own gender-specific assessment and treatment guidelines and has trained youth-facing community workers on assessing juvenile offenders and recommending programming. (Juvenile Justice Journal, 1999, p. 30). Also, the county designed a pilot network of social service agencies in order to provide a community-based continuum of care. (Juvenile

Furthermore, several of the partnerships that COPS agencies were able to produce within their disparate communities were little more than simple name recognition, and were not able to produce a significantly impactful relationship between those agencies and the surrounding communities. This lack of a true cooperative partnership also accounts for why the research conducted for the COPS program did not truly have as successful an impact as it probably

Does the criminal justice system discriminate? Provide support your position with reference to the various components of the process, and give an explanation for either why the system discriminates, or why it appears to discriminate. Yes, the criminal justice system discriminates. African-American males are overrepresented in every part of the criminal process, though there has been no good evidence to show that they actually engage in criminal behavior at rates

Criminal Justice: The Death Penalty Reasons for topic selection Causes of racial prejudice and discrimination Juvenile in delinquent society theory Culture and values Official and unofficial values The effectiveness of the death penalty The death penalty is irreversible The death penalty is barbaric Changes to the death sentence Implemented changes Sentencing guidelines Bifurcated trials Automatic appellate conviction review Proportionality review The importance of proposed changes Anticipated outcome Life imprisonment; alternative to death sentences The costs Decency standards Overall efficiency Policies in support of incarceration Conclusion References Background Despite the controversy over how effective it is

He suggested the British model of profiling instead, based on the "bottom up" type of processing, which analyzes existing evidence of specific similarities between offense and offender characteristics. The CSA uses the reverse, the "top down" processing, which relies on subjective conclusions derived from investigative experience of crimes and criminal interviews by the police and investigators (Hayden). Motive is the reason behind the commission of a crime (Zandt 2006). It

Criminal Decision Making: The Elements of the Culture of the Street and Party Life and Their Relation to Criminal Decision-Making Understanding offenders' lifestyles and the process by which they choose to commit criminal acts is critical particularly because it has important implications for crime control. Very often, certain elements of the street and party life influence the offender's assessment of the risks and rewards of crime. According to Shover and Honaker