It is important to note that while we will experience globalization, similarly we will experience further integration. This integration will be hierarchical as well as raise the specter of massive domination and control. Moreover, there will be new sectors of society who will interact in new and innovative ways, for instance via established policy networks made up of various groups (government, business among others) that will actively participate in the running of the society. While this integration takes place, business and government may be deemed less distinguished as the lines separating them shape and functions move forth and back between what was once referred to private and public sectors, (Davy & Thomas J., 1962). In case this is the way forward, the task of identifying exactly the main responsibilities of government is of importance and even ways of developing and maintaining new systems of democratic governance to perform these responsibilities.
Another trend is the demographic and socio-cultural shifts towards more and more diversity and probable conflicts. According to John Gargner, "the common good" can be described as preserve of a system in which each and everyone can (as per the law) pursue the vision they have of the common good and concurrently accomplishing the kinds of mutual accommodation that make social system workable and livable. Therefore the drama of a free society is the play of conflicting interests within a frame work of shared purposes. Difficulties have been experienced when governing a pluralist society as compared to manage homogeneous ones, yet it is the challenge that public servants will face in the future. Of course, the job of the entire public servants and administrators will continue to be more than managing or directing organizations.
Therefore, it will be the work of the public administration to enhance pluralism that can create opportunities for all in what is unique regarding different groups and individuals and to pave way for opportunity for different groups that can share in the establishment of future directions for the community. A substantial role will be played by the administrators such as in resolving disputes, teaching diversity and respect, diminishing coalitions, mediating and negotiating, while the work of the top public administration will definitely be to build community.
Finally the trend of an erosion of confidence within traditionally structured institutions that can cope with the consequences of the existing challenges. The United States which had seventy five percent of the population trusted the government to do the right thing thirty years ago, now that number has reduced to about twenty five percent and below. In addition, a similar erosion of confidence in other social institutions also exist, such as in media, labor, religion and business. Yet these were institutions that were highly held with respect in the previous ties. Part of the problem is associated with issue of alienation. Majority of people have a feeling that key social institutions have become out of control and out of touch with the plight of the majority. Those who run them are not well-known and they have values which are very different with ours.
Inauthenticity is another notion in this case. A society or an institution is inauthentic if it regularly provides the appearance of responsiveness while the basis of the conditions
