In the last decade there have been numerous examples of the UN failing to prevent the death of millions of people throughout the world. Maybe the most significant example is Rwanda; there was a general trend among the Security Council members to limit the commitment of national troops for a consistent UN presence in Kigali. The arguments against a humanitarian intervention to stop the fighting between the Hutu and Tutsi revolved around the implications such actions might have had on the neighboring countries and their undermining of authority in the region, as well as the on the inability to assure security for the UN personnel. (Graybill, 2002) Taking into consideration the failure of the UNSOM I and UNSOM II and the difficult financial crisis of the organization which was dealing with serious lack of funds for the ongoing peace operations, the decision was not to send combat troops in the region. This in turn led to a humanitarian crisis which is visible even today. Recent developments in areas such as Sudan's Darfour region indicate a slight change in approach concerning genocide. Apparently, because of the continuous public pressure, countries seem more wiling to deploy troops in areas which are not economic targets, but rather conflict disrupted societies. Therefore, despite the limited presence of the UN troops in Darfour, the world organization is diplomatically and politically supporting the African Union mission for stabilizing...
Moreover, "In July 2004, the U.S. Congress passed a resolution labeling Darfur" (Strauss, 2005). Therefore, the support of the U.S. may be of great importance to enacting any solution viable for the region. This could attract the involvement of the entire international community to address the current crisis in Sudan.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now