These issues involve matters such as safety measures, financial concerns, national politics, ideologies, etc.
The history of relations between the U.S. And the rest of the world is another subject tackled by Gilderhus. He goes as far as identifying the Munro doctrine as a basis for the international laws employed by the contemporary U.S. While holding high esteem for the doctrine in its basic form, Gilderhus considers that it is also detrimental because it can cover other interests. The doctrine's main role is to maintain world order, but in Gilderhus's opinion it can be related to an early measure taken by the U.S. To make certain that its financial and defensive interests are not threatened.
Throughout history, historians have had the feeling that their writings would not appeal to the public in a simple form. Thus, they've gone at attributing various styles to their texts, with the purpose of attracting the audience. In contrast, Gilderhus...
As an alternative to adopting a certain style, he chose to have his texts clear and to the point. Gilderhus did not want to address his reader's emotions, but to deal with their rationality.
Works cited:
1. Gilderhus, Mark T., "The Monroe Doctrine: Meanings and Implications," Presidential Studies Quarterly 36.1 (2006)
2. Gilderhus, Mark T. (2000). "The second century: U.S. -- Latin American relations since 1889." Rowman & Littlefield.
Gilderhus, Mark T. (2000). "The second century: U.S. -- Latin American relations since 1889." Rowman & Littlefield.
Gilderhus, Mark T. (2000). "The second century: U.S. -- Latin American relations since 1889." Rowman & Littlefield.
Gilderhus, Mark T., "The Monroe Doctrine: Meanings and Implications," Presidential Studies Quarterly 36.1 (2006)
