Government/Politics Texas - A Good Term Paper

Length: 10 pages Sources: 1+ Subject: Business - Law Type: Term Paper Paper: #16248028 Related Topics: Texas Politics, Jurisprudence, Reconstruction Era, Texas
Excerpt from Term Paper :

" For most this is generally seen as a reference to the Federal Judiciary. One thinks of the Warren Court, and the great number of decisions concerning civil rights, voting rights, etc. It is often not realized, however, to what an extent state judges play ar ole in shaping these issues. In many state court systems, the state system was actually more liberal than the Federal:

First and foremost, state constitutions may be used not only to broaden rights but also to restrict them. They are far easier to amend than the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, forces within a state dissatisfied with liberal court interpretations of the fundamental state law may, without nearly the same effort required on the federal level, undo those rulings....In Florida... voters adopted an amendment to the state constitutional search and seizure provision, requiring the provision to be "be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court.".... [This] "forced linkage"... requires the Florida courts -- which had also been quite liberal in establishing state constitutional rights -- to adopt no broader rights than are granted by the U.S. Supreme Court....Before forced linkage, Florida Supreme Court cases rejected U.S. Supreme Court interpretations in favor of broader rights 80% of the time; after forced linkage the rejection rate dipped to 18%.

This is one way that the Texas Constitution does allow for the judiciary to be more responsive to the opinions of the voters. A constitutional amendment would not have been required in Texas to effect these same changes. Yet, whether that is actually better is a matter that is open to question. Remember, in states such as Florida and California (California has also instituted similar constitutional change), any significant change in general judicial policy must be put up to a special vote of the general population. The Texas system permits a fair degree of popular, and even very temporary, prejudice from obscuring good policy c.f. Civil Rights.

The foregoing example reveals, in fact, a particularly great flaw in the Texas State Constitution. In the name of protecting popular sovereignty, and guarding the people against abuse of power by officials, the Constitution has also enshrined the popular will as a force of awesome power; a force of awesome that may be positive or negative. Early political theorists, both in the United States and abroad, spoke frequently of the dangers of mob rule. In the years immediately before Texan Independence, the young United States was particularly convulsed by riots:

1835 represented the crest of rioting in the United States. All types of mobs had riotous representation in this year, but over two-fifths of the riots... related to issues at the core of sectional tension [emphasis added]: there were 46 proslavery riots (35 against abolitionists and 11 in response to insurrection scares) and 15 racial riots, 11 of these against blacks, 3 in aid of fugitive slaves, and 1 by blacks.

The subjects of these riots were to have an ominous significance for later developments in Texas, and throughout the South. Pressure from the White "rank and file" was to be all important in the future system of Jim Crow. In the case of the Civil Rights Movement, the courts were all important in advancing a "liberal agenda." During the long period in which African-Americans were denied equal rights, and treated as second-class citizens, one would have been hard put to find a Texas judge who would have risked re-election by supporting an "extremist agenda" like equal rights for Black People.

Another example of popular sentiment vs. human or civil rights can be found in the "Religious Right" Movement that is so powerful in the State of Texas. Again, the State's heavy reliance on popular sovereignty opens the door to popular bias. In a State where one's public faith is deemed so important, one is not likely to discover elected judges who will be overly enthusiastic about protecting the rights of non-believers, or even of those who do not believe in quite the same way. In the 1990s, the editor of an Austin newspaper for atheists was called to jury duty. She refused to swear any kind of oath, as to her, any such statement smacked of religion. She was found in contempt of court until a judge finally worked a kind of "truth affirmation" that she could use instead of a traditional oath.

Here in this case we see the operation of popular prejudice to a much greater degree than would have been possible in say New...


Almost no matter where one looks, one sees the operation of these kinds of constraints. Texas is regularly ranked near the bottom in terms of education, welfare, medical care and so forth. These facts can easily be linked to the limitations of the Texas System. This is not to say that Texans, as a people, are especially uncaring or unfeeling. On the contrary, one can witness a great deal of public feeling, helpfulness, and camaraderie at many levels of Texas Society. Religion, and also local community life in general, is quite strong, and exhibits the powerful bonds that exist among fellow-Texans. The citizens of few others states have such a fierce sense of pride in their home state, and possess such a strong identification with it. Nevertheless, the mere suggestion that everyone has a voice, and that everyone is paying into the common pot, will lead many citizens to question how their taxes are being used, and if all who receive public money are truly deserving of that money. This can translate into a situation in great numbers of people do not fully understand the very real needs of others, and believe that, by eliminating people from "the dole," they are in fact making them better people. "In Texas, weak political institutions -- a weak governorship and a still largely amateur legislature -- allow special interests great influence over state policy."

In place of a real concern for the public, there are instead private groups that speak through the legislature, judiciary, governorship, and all of the other rather weak stae offices established by the Texas Constitution. Policies that are not in the public interest, but favor only powerful and entrenched commercial and private interests are able to gain the fore by masquerading as genuine public concerns i.e. these issues are brought forward by one of the nation's most populist state governments.

Clearly, there are many desirable features in the Constitution of the State of Texas. Among these should be placed the Document's great emphasis on popular sovereignty and the popular will. Yet, in Texas, the Constitution so circumscribes the power of any, and all, officials - judges, legislators, administrators - and so clearly fixes the responsibilities of each that, the government is largely immobilized. Change is almost impossible because of the minuteness of regulation, and the need on the part of public officials to constantly be campaigning for office. No one wishes to do anything even vaguely unpopular, and thus jeopardize his career. As well, an overweening concern with public opinion leads to giving too much weight to prejudice, as opposed to fairness, and good sense. Public money, too, is watched so carefully that it is difficult for the government to adequately provide services and assistance. In short, the Texas State Constitution should be modified to allow for greater freedom of action on the part of government officials, while at the same time preserving essential guarantees of public control and responsibility to the public good. Texas needs to find a balance between the individualism of the Old West, and the community of the modern world.

Works Cited

Campbell, Randolph. Gone to Texas: A History of the Lone Star State. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Champagne, Anthony, and Kyle Cheek. "The Cycle of Judicial Elections: Texas as a Case Study." Fordham Urban Law Journal 29.3 (2002): 907+..

Dometrius, Nelson C. "Chapter Three Governors: Their Heritage and Future." American State and Local Politics: Directions for the 21st Century. Eds. Weber, Ronald E. And Paul Brace. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 1999. 38-70.

Evans, Bette Novit. Interpreting the Free Exercise of Religion: The Constitution and American Pluralism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.

Grimsted, David. American Mobbing, 1828-1861: Toward Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Latzer, Barry. "7 California's Constitutional Counterrevolution." Constitutional Politics in the States: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Patterns. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996. 149-169.

Spaw, Pasty McDonald. The Texas Senate. 1st ed. Vol. 1. College Station, TX: Texas a & M. University Press, 1990.

Works Cited

Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Schweitzer, Peter R. "Chapter 1 Russian Anthropology, Western Hunter-Gatherer Debates, and…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited" target="_blank" REL="NOFOLLOW">

Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999." target="_blank" REL="NOFOLLOW">

Schweitzer, Peter R. "Chapter 1 Russian Anthropology, Western Hunter-Gatherer Debates, and Siberian Peoples." Hunters and Gatherers in the Modern World: Conflict, Resistance, and Self-Determination. Eds. Schweitzer, Peter P., Megan Biesele, and Robert K. Hitchcock. New York: Berghahn Books, 2000. 29-51.

Ginsberg, Lowi, and Weir, "The Texas Constitution," We the People, Chapter 20, 4th Ed., W.W. Norton and Company, 2003. URL:" target="_blank" REL="NOFOLLOW">
Anthony Champagne and Kyle Cheek, "The Cycle of Judicial Elections: Texas as a Case Study," Fordham Urban Law Journal 29.3 (2002), Questia, 24 Apr. 2005
Barry Latzer, "7 California's Constitutional Counterrevolution," Constitutional Politics in the States: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Patterns (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996) 168.
David Grimsted, American Mobbing, 1828-1861: Toward Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998) 4.
Bette Novit Evans, Interpreting the Free Exercise of Religion: The Constitution and American Pluralism (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997) 78.

Cite this Document:

"Government Politics Texas - A Good" (2005, April 26) Retrieved August 19, 2022, from

"Government Politics Texas - A Good" 26 April 2005. Web.19 August. 2022. <>

"Government Politics Texas - A Good", 26 April 2005, Accessed.19 August. 2022,

Related Documents
Politics - Texas V. Johnson, the Supreme
Words: 1223 Length: 3 Pages Topic: American History Paper #: 45654933

Politics - Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court case about Flag Burning The phrase "Symbolic expression" is usually used to explain expressions that are mixed with elements of behavior. Symbolic expression (or expressive behavior) can be protected by the First Amendment, according to The Supreme Court that has made it clear in a series of cases. Many of these cases have been highly controversial, but none has probably been so, more

Government of Texas Like All
Words: 599 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 75325156

In the event that the amendment is approved, the amendment will take effect when the official vote canvass confirms that the proposal has received majority approval unless the terms of the amendment specify a later effective date. The canvassing procedure is required to be completed within 15 to 30 days following the election date. If the amendment is rejected by the voters the legislature has the option of resubmitting the

Texas Politics
Words: 557 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Healthcare Paper #: 5462218

Texas Politics There are vast differences in the ideological beliefs of the political parties in Texas. Their stances on a number of issues ranging from education to immigration are vastly different. Furthermore, there relationship and views to the role of the Federal government are also substantially different. For example, the Texan Republic Party strongly emphasizes their sovereignty and states (Republican Party of Texas, 2014): "We strongly urge the Texas Legislature ignore, oppose,

Texas Constitution
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 30778093

Texas Constitution The fundamental law of the State of Texas is clearly stated out in the Constitution of the State of Texas. This document was officially adopted by the voters of the State in 1876 and has since them been amended in several occasions. In addition, under this constitution, the principles for the operation of state government and legal system have been outlined. The principle of separation of powers has given

Texas Republican Party the Republican
Words: 1415 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 8926668

Baggett continues by pointing out that the Texas Republican Party was basically born out of the policies of the Whig party, and reflected the vision of Henry Clay. What was the Whig party all about? In the Wikipedia encyclopedia explains that the Whig Party was "formed to go against the policies of President Andrew Jackson and the Democratic Party" Whigs believed that Congress should have more power than the

Texas Constitution of 1876 Texas
Words: 1475 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 43675340

Women, for example, only gained their right of suffrage in 1920 and Article VI of the Constitution of 1876 only gives "male persons" over the age of 21 who have "resided in Texas for at least one year" the right to vote. Compact Theory: The compact theory holds that the formation of the Union of the United States was through a "compact" of all the States individually and the creation