Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Group Decision-Making
What are the advantages and disadvantages to group decision-making?
The term 'group think' is often a negatively applied, a pejorative term used to describe conformist thinking. Thus, one of the primary disadvantages of a group as opposed to a team is that the dynamics of group interaction can stifle individual creativity, stifling the different potential contributions from a potentially diverse collection of people. The strengths of human diversity and multiplicity are lost when only the opinions of the most vocal and extraverted, are heard. However, one potential group advantage is that a group can be greater than the sum of its parts, pooling diverse experiences, impressions, competencies and ideas of many people from different backgrounds. No single individual in today's complex and demanding society can do and know everything -- if facilitated properly, a group's strengths can be collective stronger the conglomerate individuals that make up the group, and become its own entity.
What is a group?
A work group is defined as collections of people who interact and function together in ways that are representative more of their areas of collective expertise, than individual merits. People function in work groups together much as they do in unified departments within an organization.
How does a group differ from a team?
On a true team the human parts of the group still retain their integrity as individuals, but become a part of a whole that is larger than their individual selves -- teams bring specialized skills or knowledge that are vital to larger organizational goals, like a baseball team is made up of a good pitcher and a hitter, fielders, etc., with the aim of winning a championship -- rather than just lots of great hitters.
How can a group become a high-performance team?
People must feel free to share their unique skills and ideas, so they can work together to solve problems and achieve common goals. High-performance teams listen as well as talk, are comfortable with reasonable disagreements, but keep task-focused so consensus ultimately occurs and the end of the brainstorming and problem-solving process.
While allowing an authoritarian voice to hold final sway over what is done may be least desirable, it may be necessary in a very spread-out group with many areas of expertise, or if the leader bears the brunt of the responsibility for the project and has greater knowledge of the different organizational factors involved. There is no single perfect formula for forming a cohesive group, making decisions, and arguing in
group decision-making process. Identify successful unsuccessful experience group decision making. Discuss factors affected group's effectiveness, drawing concepts readings. Please include headings sectional headings. Group decision making The decision making process is pivotal within any organized group and it influences the ultimate success of the overall entity. In modern day times, the organizational leaders no longer make and implement decisions top down, but engage their subalterns in the decision making process. The group
Leadership: Group Decision-Making Case PaperCompanies rely on rational decision-making so stakeholders can take intelligent steps for profitability and value creation. With globalization on the rise, working individually is no more an option, and collaboration across business units asks for group decision-making (Hsieh et al., 2020). This paper explains the suitability of brainstorming, nominal group technique, and Delphi technique for group decision-making and their respective application to the given cases.Case 1Since
coevolutionary gaming facilitate group decision making? Coevolutionary gaming can help to facilitate group decision-making through its highly demanding and highly complex processes. As Cares and Miskel explain, this type of gaming can help one to navigate complex strategy landscapes in safe environments that feel like real-time, but which actually allow one the luxury of making mistakes and engaging in bolder forms of trial error (2007). These games are even played
Group Decision-Making Decision making in institutes have been depicted as a progression of conduct with the full amount of level-headedness at individual excessive, as well as absolute illogicality at the other excessive. The depiction entails that no more than illogical decision making brings about individual morals priority in excess of economic principles. There must be a way of finding some focal point amid these ends, as it is obvious that
Nominal Group Decision-Making earning team Creative Problem-Solving Demonstration: Topic "Coming late leaving early" Please Nominal Group Technique Discuss choose technique solve problem. - Nominal Group Technique Explain technique chosen briefly summarize technique conducted a virtual team environment. Coming late and leaving early: Nominal group technique Currently, our office is faced with a very difficult problem: people are arriving late and leaving early. The result is that productivity is decreased and people are getting