Homo Erectus: Who Was The Earliest Modern Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
995
Cite
Related Topics:

Homo Erectus: Who was the earliest modern ancestor of today's homo sapiens? Homo Erectus was a species of mammal that was, in form and function, a modern foreshadower of today's human being. Homo Erectus lived from about 1,900,000 years to about 400,000 years ago. "The Latin word Homo means human being. The term erectus means upright and refers to the creature's upright posture. Homo erectus differed from modern human beings in having a large, projecting face; a low, sloping forehead; and a large brow ridge, a raised strip of bone across the lower forehead. Homo erectus also possessed a large jaw that lacked a chin." (Mann, 2005) The brain of Homo erectus was smaller than the brain of modern human beings, even though this species was able to manipulate simple tools, contain fire, walk in migrating tribes over long distances, and engage in other, modern humanlike behaviors.

Homo erectus is commonly characterized as "an accomplished tool maker and tool user." It is assumed he or she used "hand-axes" and sharp-edged flints to make fire. The tools of Homo erectus are the first in the fossil record to show conscious design of any complexity. Wooden tools and weapons are also assumed to be present in the tool kit of this species. However, "none has been preserved in the fossil record." Thus there is no conclusive archeological proof such tools were used, even if the species could technically manipulate such tools unlike its earlier ancestors. (Long Foreground: Species Timeline, p.2) Controversial claims have also been made about cannibalism in some species, given...

...

Fossil remains show that Homo erectus migrated as far as the island of Java in Southeast Asia before spreading into southern Europe and northern China. Recent dating techniques applied to earlier finds in Java and the Caucasus Mountains indicate dates much earlier than that and would place Homo erectus in Asia over 2 million years ago. Such early dates would, if proven accurate, dramatically overturn the currently accepted chronology of early human development. (Long Foreground: Species Timeline, p.4)
Thus, two different hypotheses exist as to when Homo erectus first arose. The first, most traditional model is called "The Multi-regional Evolutionary Model and used to be by far the most popular until recent genetic evidence was brought to light. "This model believes that roughly 1 million years ago, Homo erectus expanded its range beyond Africa, first into Asia and then into Europe, developing geographically variable populations. Homo erectus then became the direct ancestor of Homo sapiens by a gradual worldwide (excluding the Americas and Australia) evolutionary transformation of all populations of Homo erectus." ("Homo Erectus," 2005)

At this date, however, the earliest claimed dates for Homo erectus outside of Africa are…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

"Homo Erectus." (2005) Geocites Palaeoanthropology web site. Herectus. Retrieved 16 Mary 2005 at http://www.geocities.com/palaeoanthropology/Herectus.html

'Long Foreground: Species Timeline." Retrieved 16 Mary 2005 at http://www.wsu.edu: 8001/vwsu/gened/learn-modules/top_longfor/timeline/h-sapiens/h-sapiens-a.html

Mann, Alan E. (2005) "Homo erectus." World Book Online Reference Center. 2005. World Book, Inc. Herectus. Retrieved 16 Mary 2005 at .


Cite this Document:

"Homo Erectus Who Was The Earliest Modern" (2005, May 16) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/homo-erectus-who-was-the-earliest-modern-64012

"Homo Erectus Who Was The Earliest Modern" 16 May 2005. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/homo-erectus-who-was-the-earliest-modern-64012>

"Homo Erectus Who Was The Earliest Modern", 16 May 2005, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/homo-erectus-who-was-the-earliest-modern-64012

Related Documents

Annunaki Mystery: Are Homo Sapiens the Result of an Alteration of Homo Erectus DNA Mixed with Unspecified Cells of the Ancient Sumerian Gods Known as the Annunaki? The objective of this study is to examine the creation of Adam and Eve which is related in the Holy Bible account of the Garden of Eden and to examine other ancient texts which relate the creation of mankind and to determine if homo

Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans The curiosity to study origin and birth of human beings has shaped a holistic subject, paleoanthropology, which mainly focuses on the origin of modern human beings or Homo sapiens (Matthew and Nitecki, 1994).For about 30,000 years, the Earth has been inhabited by humans that carry anatomical and behavioral uniformity. The situation70,000 years before was clearly different and diverse groups of hominids preceded the modern Homo sapiens;

There is no reason to suppose that a difference as radical as true language vs. protolanguage is required to explain why modern humans replaced Neanderthals so quickly. In much shorter spaces of time, groups of modern humans have replaced other groups with identical biological capacities; it took only decades, not millennia, for Europeans to replace Tasmanians, for instance. The precise nature of Neanderthal capacities and of human-Neanderthal interactions remains tantalizingly

twenty million years ago the Indian plate collided with Asia; this generated the Himalayan mountain range, which drastically altered the earth's climate forever after. Basically, "The climate became drier and the forests of what is now Africa and Asia contracted. The result was an increased area of savanna habitat, with fewer trees." (Campbell, 711). This brought about environmental and ecological changes that animals already adapted to one way of

A 1400-year-old volcanic or other induced "winter" likely spurred the divergence possibly even later than 150,000 years ago, brought about by an explosion of Toba in Sumatra. The elimination of this bottleneck 10, 000 years later allowed another wave of emigration from Africa. Volcanic winter may have succeeded in the reductions of populations to levels low enough for founder effects, genetic drift and local adaptations to produce rapid population

If the temperature is taken miles away, or if the insect that was found and studied was not exactly the same as one that had been studied before, only similar perhaps, the defense attorney will also often argue that the entomologist's testimony is only guesswork, and therefore that it is not valid and should not be admitted as evidence (Sachs, 1998). Judges have taken different approaches about whether to allow