Impact Of Labeling On Juvenile Offenders Research Paper

Length: 5 pages Sources: 2 Subject: Criminal Justice Type: Research Paper Paper: #72619212 Related Topics: Juvenile Delinquency, Criminology, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice
Excerpt from Research Paper :

Labeling Effects of First Juvenile Arrests

Labeling Juvenile First Offenders

Luberman, et al. (2014) studied the labeling effects of first juvenile arrests, which appear to take two primary forms: secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Using a robust quasi-experimental research design, the authors utilized a sample and structural aspects of a longitudinal study conducted by the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCH). The PHDCH longitudinal study conducted three waves of data collection at 3-year intervals with seven youth cohorts. The PHDCH selected a sample from 80 neighborhood clusters in the city of Chicago. The neighborhood clusters were stratified by seven categories of racial / ethnic composition and three levels of socio-economic status (high, medium, and low). Within the sampling unit of 80 neighborhood clusters, a sampling frame of 1,517 youth, from the 12-year-old to 15-year-old cohorts, were selected by simple random sampling.

In order to measure the re-arrest outcomes, the researchers selected 58 arrestees, for the treatment group, and 1,191 non-arrestees who completed the self-reported offending (SRO) questionnaire and also consented to the search of official records. Of the sampling frame, 34 youth did not respond to the survey and 234 youth did not consent to have their official records searched. Wave II attrition reduced the sample to 53 arrestees and 951 non-arrestees. The sample of arrestees was distributed across 39 of the 80 neighborhood clusters, with only one neighborhood cluster containing more than three arrestees.

Three hypotheses were tested in the research, as follows:

1) A first juvenile arrest has an independent positive effect on subsequent delinquency and criminal offending above and beyond the influence of individual, family, peer, neighborhood, and school correlates.

2) Arrested adolescents are more likely to be...

...

That is, adolescents with a previous arrest are more likely to be arrested in the future than comparable non-arrestees even if they engage in similar levels of future dependency.

The independent variable was constructed by determining whether the subjects were officially arrested as juveniles for the first time during a period of 45 months between wave I and wave III interviews. The dependent variable is an outcome measure that consists of 22 items that represent different types of criminal acts committed by the subjects in the preceding 12 months. To determine the temporal sequence of the arrests with pretreatment and treatment, the data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) were merged with arrest data from the Chicago Police Department (CPD) and the Illinois State Police (ISP). Data was matched by accessing demographic information and personal identifiers for the PHDCN survey respondents.

Data collection was retrospective, examining arrest records on juvenile offenders from the Chicago Police Department (CPD), the Illinois State Police (ISP), and the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCH).

The literature review was extensive and explored each of the primary lines of research associated with the research topic, the research questions, and with each of the research hypotheses. The literature review examined studies that addressed the labeling effects on delinquent behavior and on the response of social and criminal justice systems. Also addressed in the literature review were studies that focused on the labeling effect of juvenile arrests. The literature review was of sufficient depth to examine prior research studies that delved into the aspects of the social and criminal justice systems such as increased surveillance following labeling or first arrests. Studies that analyzed both primary and secondary sanctioning events were considered in the literature review. The literature review is considered to have presented an adequate…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Liberman, A.M., Kirk, D.S., & Kim, K. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52(3), 345-370.


Cite this Document:

"Impact Of Labeling On Juvenile Offenders" (2014, November 24) Retrieved August 8, 2022, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/impact-of-labeling-on-juvenile-offenders-2153185

"Impact Of Labeling On Juvenile Offenders" 24 November 2014. Web.8 August. 2022. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/impact-of-labeling-on-juvenile-offenders-2153185>

"Impact Of Labeling On Juvenile Offenders", 24 November 2014, Accessed.8 August. 2022,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/impact-of-labeling-on-juvenile-offenders-2153185

Related Documents
Juvenile Offenders and Reoffending
Words: 11154 Length: 37 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 46175369

Relevance Juvenile offenders and reoffenders are an important problem facing the United States criminal justice system. For more than one hundred years, states held the belief that the juvenile justice system acted as a vehicle to safeguard the public via offering a structure that enables the rehabilitation of children growing into adulthood. States identified the difference of children committing crimes versus adult offenders (Loeber & Farrington, 2012). For example, the states

Labeling Theory and Its Specific
Words: 5492 Length: 16 Pages Topic: Children Paper #: 73190981

This in turn more often than not leads the stigmatized to acquire more and more deviant and possibly criminal identities (Lanier & Henry, 1998). There can, of course, be other antecedents prior to labeling that can enhance the process of delinquency in juveniles. Mental and/or psychological impairments must also be considered as a contributing factor. Certain of these attributes can also contribute to highly suggestible levels in regards to behavior

Juvenile Recidivism Rates and Analysis
Words: 12874 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 40811758

Dugan: Should be on its own page. Juvenile recidivism is a prevalent problem in the criminal justice system. Tackling reoffending remains a complex task requiring several strategies and aims. It involves research, acknowledgement of causes, factors, exploration, and evaluation of subgroups to generate long-term, positive changes in the lives of juvenile offenders. From gang violence to Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP), researchers discover some of the reasons why juveniles

Juvenile Delinquency -- Causes and Preventive Strategies
Words: 2185 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Children Paper #: 28994854

Juvenile Delinquency -- Causes and Preventive Strategies Juvenile delinquency defines negative behavior in young teens and children which result in serious and severe crimes. With the passage of time crimes committed by adolescents and young children have risen alarmingly. Several economic, social and family related issues are the core reasons behind the rise in juvenile delinquency. This paper discusses the core reason due to which young teens and children sought towards

Juvenile Injustice: How the Juvenile
Words: 1841 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Children Paper #: 47448693

, 2009). While there are schools in the juvenile system, some of these Hispanic children may come in so behind in their educations that they will requires special services to bring them current in their educations. Therefore, educational and mental health concerns are highlighted for Hispanic youth entering into the juvenile justice system. Conclusion The juvenile justice system in the United States is out-of-control. While Fairfax County, Virginia's juvenile justice system is

Juvenile Delinquency Is a Socially
Words: 1168 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Children Paper #: 35731910

(Causal Theories of Juvenile Delinquency: Social Perspectives) Charles Cooley in his publication Human Nature and the Social Order analyzed the personal perception of juvenile delinquents by means of the studies of children and their imaginary friends. Cooley develops his theory around the imaginary concept of looking glass self, which is considered to be a type of imaginary sociability. People introspectively imagine through the eyes of others in their social circles