Incarnation and the Bible

¶ … Strauss, Lehman. Why God Became Man. 2004. [Online]. Available http://bible.org/Article/-god -- man. For journal article, write a critique similar Book Analyses assignments. "Why God Became Man" - analysis "Why God Became Man" brings on an intriguing idea -- the concept that incarnation can be discussed in a context involving the Bible and Christian teachings in general.

The article provides readers with the opportunity to interpret biblical texts from the writer's perspective and to gradually become better acquainted with the idea of incarnation being an important idea in Christianity. While it is intriguing to look at these ideas and at how the author links incarnation with a series of accounts from the bible, it would also be interesting to perceive this point-of-view objectively.

Although the article relates to the idea of incarnation as seen from a rational perspective from the very first lines of the text, the article goes on to address this respective idea in the context of Christ's birth without actually attempting to provide readers with a complex understanding of the concept. To a certain degree, it would be safe to say that the writer simply attempts to retell biblical events from a more modern perspective.

If some would feel those particular texts to be outdated, "Why God Became Man" aims at providing these people with the opportunity to get a fresh understanding of their meaning (even with the fact that the article does not attempt to alter their initial message). The fact that the article discusses biblical ideas without actually attempting to bring on innovative concepts plays an important role in making the overall text more credible.

The writer obviously did not want to introduce new ideas and focused on reinforcing the ones that humanity has been discussing for two millennia. This makes it possible for the text to effectively reach out to readers and to provide them with a set of rational concepts that they cannot possibly refute.

It is not necessarily that the article is aimed at non-Christians, as the writer obviously wanted to address convinced Christians at this point and to enable them to enrich their knowledge while also discussing topics that they were already familiar with. The writer acknowledges the degree to which incarnation will always be a sensible subject and does not attempt to bombard readers with pointless information that might confuse them.

By restating the same idea over and over again while also providing supporting paragraphs on each occasion he does so, the writer manages to get readers to look at matters from a more general point-of-view. The article is not necessarily meant to persuade readers to reach a conclusion, as it simply provides them with information and intends to make them feel in charge of reaching a conclusion based on this respective information.

The article attempts to take readers on a journey to finding out why and how the divine power chose to incarnate into a human being. By providing this journey, the writer attempts to influence 'passengers' to be more likely to agree to his point-of-view concerning incarnation in relationship to biblical teachings.

Personal Conclusion Statement The article effectively puts across the message it is designed for and it would be safe to say that most readers are going to agree to the writer's opinion concerning how and why God chose to transpose His image into the world. The writer is likely well-acquainted with the dangers associated with bringing on new ideas in religious discussions and refrains from introducing revolutionary thoughts.

Even with this, there is also a danger associated with remaining true to the initial messages comprised by the religious teachings he addresses. The fact that readers come across the same idea over and over again feels somewhat like an intrusion from the writer -- a concept that is actually probable to encourage readers to question information they.