Institute For Policy Studies And The War In Iraq Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
664
Cite
Related Topics:

Iraq The war in Iraq has become one of the most contentious political issues in recent years. Although many citizens of the United States originally supported sending in troops to Iraq based on the possible presence of weapons of mass destruction, currently more and more people are crying out for the return of American troops. According to the Institute for Policy Studies and Foreign Policy (IPS) report entitled "Paying the Price," over 1500 troops have been killed since the onset of the war, and over 11,300 have been wounded. Equally if not more startling are the casualties on the other side: approximately 24,000 Iraqi troops have been killed in battle but an astounding 16,000 to 100,000 innocent civilians have also had their lives taken by the war. These horrific numbers belie the potential futility of the war. Continued presence of American troops in Iraq is needless, costly to both life and to taxpayer money. Even before reading through the IPS documents, including Phyllis Bennis' "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis," I held strong opinions...

...

The IPS documents fuel my existing opinions further, and I certainly believe that American troops should be withdrawn from Iraq as soon as possible.
One of the main reasons to withdraw troops is the obvious strength of the Iraqi insurgency and the consequential loss of American lives. According to "Paying the Price," the insurgency soared in popularity between 2003 and 2004. In just one year, estimates rose from 5,000 fighters to 40,000 on the side of the insurgency. Essentially, the war has created hardened anti-American sentiments throughout Iraq and the rest of the Middle East. The war, rather than bolster the American cause for freedom and democracy, has instead spawned further acts of terror and inspired increasing numbers of people to take up arms against the United States. Far from being viewed as "liberators," as the Bush administration would like us to believe, Americans are often viewed as terrorists.

Bennis' report, which was…

Sources Used in Documents:

One of the main reasons to withdraw troops is the obvious strength of the Iraqi insurgency and the consequential loss of American lives. According to "Paying the Price," the insurgency soared in popularity between 2003 and 2004. In just one year, estimates rose from 5,000 fighters to 40,000 on the side of the insurgency. Essentially, the war has created hardened anti-American sentiments throughout Iraq and the rest of the Middle East. The war, rather than bolster the American cause for freedom and democracy, has instead spawned further acts of terror and inspired increasing numbers of people to take up arms against the United States. Far from being viewed as "liberators," as the Bush administration would like us to believe, Americans are often viewed as terrorists.

Bennis' report, which was written in 2003 near the beginning of the war, supports the view that the invasion was unnecessary and would lead to catastrophic consequences. For instance, Bennis notes that the Bush administration had planned early on to occupy the sovereign nation in an overt take-over. Bennis cites the obvious economic benefits to the United States of such a take-over, such as access to or control over oil reserves and their related profits throughout "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis." Most critics of the U.S. war in Iraq suggest that at least part of the motives for the invasion was to secure financial gain. The Bush administration cleverly clouded its intentions by claiming to deliver a message of freedom and liberty, to purport protecting the Iraqi people from terrorist regimes, and to promote peace. Such assertions seem laughable today in light of the current conditions in Iraq, and few can comfortably say "it was all worth it" based on the hard evidence contained in such reports as those published by the IPS.

Among the enlightening evidence supplied in "Paying the Price" and in "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis," the most astounding are the numbers of troops and civilians killed, detailed in the former report. Additionally, tracing the shifts in public opinion since the onset of war demonstrates that more people are becoming disillusioned with the policies of the Bush administration. What amazes me and many others is the still-strong support of the administration in spite of their obvious lies regarding the motives for entering the country, and in spite of the lack of real threat that Iraq had posed before the Untied States attacked, as outlined in section nine of the report by Bennis. Since it is now common knowledge that weapons of mass destruction were also never found and because no clear connection between Iraq and the September 11 attacks hasn't been established, and also because of the lack of international support in favor of the United States, our troops should be removed as soon as possible.


Cite this Document:

"Institute For Policy Studies And The War In Iraq" (2005, June 20) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/institute-for-policy-studies-and-the-war-64595

"Institute For Policy Studies And The War In Iraq" 20 June 2005. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/institute-for-policy-studies-and-the-war-64595>

"Institute For Policy Studies And The War In Iraq", 20 June 2005, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/institute-for-policy-studies-and-the-war-64595

Related Documents

The negative aspect of the matter however, is the limited breakthroughs made at the practical level, as most discussions end in declarative aims, yet no timeline for an actual implementation of them. On the one hand, the European Union did not present itself as very willing to offer economic incentives and aid to the ailing Russian Federation, and on the other hand, Russian opposition forces who argue against a

war on Iraq, and considers whether U.S. policy towards Iraq can prevail, through an analysis of eight facets of this policy: international trade; weapons of mass destruction; democratization; the war against tyranny vs. The grab for oil; the "shock and awe" tactics used at the beginning of the war; the U.S. occupation vs. liberation; whether the new government of Iraq will be Iraqi run or whether Iraq will become

Thus, Iraq has defied the economic embargo applied according to resolution 661 and has not cooperated with the arms inspection imposed by the UN Security Council through Resolution 665 (Leurdijk and Beernink, 2002). Therefore, the state of Kuwait can no longer consider itself protected by the international community and by the United Nations which it trusts greatly. The international law offers the possibility to retaliate in a manner that can

War in Iraq
PAGES 10 WORDS 3714

invasion and occupation of Iraq from three different perspectives. Firstly, the paper provides a historical background pertaining to the interest of energy-hungry countries such as France, America and Britain. The paper also provides a brief background of the relationship of Iraq with its neighbors and how oil has turned out to be a major source of attraction for the imperial powers. Secondly, the paper provides an in-depth perspective of

Katulis and Juul help put into perspective the tentative position of Iraq in saying that Iraq's leadership remains split on a draft version of SOFA (Katulis and Juul, online). The Iraqi cabinet must vote a two-thirds majority in favor of their support for a plan (Katulis and Juul). This may be difficult to achieve when the cabinet is divided along religious sect lines. It is, too, perhaps the first time

War and Occupation: The Effects of the U.S. Occupation on Japan's Government and Politics The recent change in the American foreign policy direction which has seen the replacement of its traditional anti-colonialist tilt by the neo-conservative belief of guided nation building evokes a lot of interest in the history of United State's occupation of post world war II Japan. Although each such occupation is different -- the political, social and cultural