" (Lee, 2009) Those standards include the following: (1) a guarantee of the three labor rights (organizing, collective bargaining, and collective action) based on freedom of association, (2) a ban on forced labor, (3) a ban on child labor, and (4) no discrimination in labor. (Lee, 2009) Stated as important secondary standards are those as follows: (1) responsibility for employment; (2) industrial safety and health; and (3) training and education. (Lee, 2009) Lee states that western multinational companies "...are capable of investment, innovation, and reporting for SR, because they have been exposed to the CSR movement for some time. Thus companies in developing countries are sure to be disadvantaged under the ISO 26000 regime. Although it is a "voluntary" standard, if companies from developed nations make it a requirement for their transactions, most companies from developing nations, as "vendors," would have to accept it." (Lee, 2009)
Therefore businesses must necessarily "...internalize the ISO 26000 norms so that they are always ready, rather than dealing with them whenever a situation arises. The costs for CSR will not hinder a company's competitiveness; rather, CSR is likely to strengthen competitiveness in the long-term. The brand that will prevail in the fierce global competition must have a brand power built upon consumers' trust. And the best way to build that trust and to become the product of consumers' choice is to create an image as a socially responsible company. In that sense, CSR may actually be perceived as an entry barrier built by leading companies." (Lee, 2009) Finally, Lee reports that the major international stock exchanges "...are already using indices that reflect each company's CSR, of which employment responsibility is an important factor. Considering the international trends and market trends explained above, it seems apparent that CSR has become an essential strategic factor in business management. It has become an endogenous factor, not an exogenous one." (Lee, 2009)
V. Thailand and Labor Standards Adjustment for U.S. Compliance
The Journal of Corporate Citizenship report dated March 22nd, 2004 states that Thai labor law and the perception of factor management of economic realities are that which "often prevent the adoption and implementation" of Voluntary Labor Standards. In fact, "conflicting labor standards, a low minimum wage and the dire financial needs of workers often result in adverse working conditions for employees in the garment industry." (Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2004)
The Thai Labor Protection Act of 1998 makes 36 hours of overtime permissible while the Voluntary Labor Standards state 12 hours of overtime as being permissible. Stated as another major obstacle to compliance with Voluntary Labor Standards are human resource policies and management attitudes toward the workforce. The Voluntary Labor Standards corporate codes of conduct make the use of monetary fines and penalties in applying disciplinary measures illegal however; these methods are used regularly in applying employee discipline in Thai businesses.
Discrimination against and mistreatment of women in factories in Thailand is rampant and pregnancy testing is...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now