Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Rawls contends that in order for distributive justice to work social and economic process must exist under suitable political and economic institutions. He calls for the establishment of four background institutions or branches, in the government to ensure equity of justice. The allocation branch ensures that the pricing system is competitive and that no individual or corporation forms unreasonable market power. The stabilization branch endeavors to bring about reasonably full employment opportunities for those that want to work. The transfer branch guarantees a certain level of well-being. Finally, the distribution branch strives to preserve an approximate justice in distributive shares by means of taxation and the necessary adjustments in the rights of property (Rawls).
Discussion
People in a state of poverty, whether it is temporal or generational, are already in a difficult position. Often their living situations are tenuous at best, and a sick child or a brief lay-off could easily initiate dire consequences. Libertarians wish to repeal the welfare programs that subsidize these families and individuals. The argument for this repeal is framed around two claims, the first is that such a redistribution of wealth infringes on the liberty of those being taxed, and second the poor will actually be better off if welfare were abolished (Loo).
Let's address the second claim first. The implication of calling for the repeal of welfare is that those taken off welfare will now find jobs to support themselves. In reality most welfare recipients have limited skills and substandard education; many do not even have high school diplomas or GEDs. The immediate...
As most of these workers are unskilled, minimally skilled, or lack the proper education and training for better jobs, a massive increase of comparatively low-skilled laborers will enter into the market. There are not enough of these jobs in today's economy to support this influx (Loo).
As for the argument that welfare is a compulsory tax equivalent to forced labor, many of the people who espouse this argument have advantages based on social circumstances, financial position or authority. It is only natural that they would want to protect their position.
Conclusion
If we truly wish to have a just society it is imperative that society's moral obligation to be just in the distribution of opportunity be fulfilled. The libertarian political ideology fails to recognize any obligation society might have to its less fortunate members.
Works Cited
James, Louis. "Libertarian Party on Welfare & Poverty." On the Issues. Source LP News. 1 April 1999. 13 Fedruary 2011.
Loo, Dennis. "Libertarianism and Poverty." The Ethical Spectacle. April 2003. 13 Fedruary 2011.
Piccard, Dick. "A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls." Ohio.edu. 4 April 2005. 13 Fedruary 2011.
Rawls, John. "An Egalitarian Theory of Justice." A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Ruwart, Mary "How Would Libertarians Help the Homelesss?" Libertarianism. 20 September 2010. 13 Fedruary 2011.
Works Cited
James, Louis. "Libertarian Party on Welfare & Poverty." On the Issues. Source LP News. 1 April 1999. 13 Fedruary 2011. <http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Libertarian_Party_Welfare_+_Poverty.htm>
Loo, Dennis. "Libertarianism and Poverty." The Ethical Spectacle. April 2003. 13 Fedruary 2011. <http://www.spectacle.org/0403/loo.html>
Piccard, Dick. "A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls." Ohio.edu. 4 April 2005. 13 Fedruary 2011. <http://www.ohio.edu/people/piccard/entropy/rawls.html>
Rawls, John. "An Egalitarian Theory of Justice." A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Ruwart, Mary "How Would Libertarians Help the Homelesss?" Libertarianism. 20 September 2010. 13 Fedruary 2011. <http://www.libertarianism.com/content/short_answers?id=libertarianism-101&post_id=145>
welfare state' today in contemporary Britain? The British view of welfare has always been one of conducting government as a beneficent and paternalistic entity that was engaged in making sure citizens had what they needed for basic survival (Field, 2011). This view was first garnered by the liberals of the 1960's and it was furthered, as the years went along, until the present day. There were some hiccups in the
Thus the dependence of so many people on government handouts is very soon to reach a point of crisis and possible social unrest. Welfare Statism is not only a manifestly politically unjust system. It is also a wholly unsustainable one from the perspective of political economy. It is based upon expanding budgets and a continually young and growing population. In a society like America where the average age and life
Such an ascription "both distorts the substance of his thought and grossly exaggerates his actual influence on the politics of his country." He exerted "little influence" on American politics, Trask continues, though Sumner "praised modern capitalism," believed that the doctrine of "laissez faire is just as applicable to society as it is to the economy," for, "the social order," Trask explains, "like the economy, is government by its own laws
Values Liberals tend to emphasize individual rights over governmental authority and to leave the economy alone, unless it needs help. More and more, the economy has been controlled by conservative elements and this has tended to squelch free trade and put too many regulations on imports, while allowing special interests avenues of squeezing more revenue out of the citizens by legalizing higher interest rates, putting tariffs on imports, freezing influx of
This is where incentives come in to play. Wagner quotes Rudolf Hickel who distinguishes between an entrepreneurial state and a tax state (our present state of affairs). Hickel and Schumpeter both see the tax state as acting outside the normal laws of contract and property to confiscate wealth. The entrepreneurial state is just the exact polar opposite of this. Corporatist principles that have been incorporated into this system. Corporate
The state currently spends a great deal of money on detaining people on marijuana related offenses. Legalization could help to free up some of these resources which could then be used on more important programs throughout the state. When examining the economic benefits of marijuana legalization it is important to weigh the social costs related to outlawing access to goods, because such restrictions create black markets. Black markets are associated